Relationship between IDDSI Flow Test and Consistometric Measures for Consistency Classification - An Examination of Thickened Liquids Prepared Using Starch-Based and Xanthan Gum-Based Thickening Agents.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1159/000540118
Mingyue Xiong, Nelson Ng, Brian Siu, Manwa L Ng
{"title":"Relationship between IDDSI Flow Test and Consistometric Measures for Consistency Classification - An Examination of Thickened Liquids Prepared Using Starch-Based and Xanthan Gum-Based Thickening Agents.","authors":"Mingyue Xiong, Nelson Ng, Brian Siu, Manwa L Ng","doi":"10.1159/000540118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Consistency of liquid food plays an important role in managing patients with dysphagia, which can be objectively evaluated by using IDDSI Flow Test and consistometry. The present study established the relationship between IDDSI Flow Test and consistometric measures, and examined the measurement limitations of each test associated with thickened liquids prepared using starch-based and xanthan gum-based thickening agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen thickened liquid samples of consistency ranging from IDDSI Level 1 (mildly thick) to Level 3 (moderately thick) were prepared using starch-based and xanthan gum-based thickeners. IDDSI Flow Test and consistometric measures were obtained and analyzed using correlation and regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A strong correlation was observed between both tests. Regression analyses revealed a linear and a quadratic relationship between IDDSI Flow Test and consistometric measurements, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Starch-based and xanthan gum-based thickeners exhibited different relationships between IDDSI Flow Test and consistometric measurements. Findings allow easy conversion and adaptation of consistometric measures to the IDDSI framework, which renders the use of consistometry in the clinical settings as a complementary quantitative measurement of liquid consistency to IDDSI Flow Test.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Consistency of liquid food plays an important role in managing patients with dysphagia, which can be objectively evaluated by using IDDSI Flow Test and consistometry. The present study established the relationship between IDDSI Flow Test and consistometric measures, and examined the measurement limitations of each test associated with thickened liquids prepared using starch-based and xanthan gum-based thickening agents.

Methods: Thirteen thickened liquid samples of consistency ranging from IDDSI Level 1 (mildly thick) to Level 3 (moderately thick) were prepared using starch-based and xanthan gum-based thickeners. IDDSI Flow Test and consistometric measures were obtained and analyzed using correlation and regression.

Results: A strong correlation was observed between both tests. Regression analyses revealed a linear and a quadratic relationship between IDDSI Flow Test and consistometric measurements, respectively.

Conclusion: Starch-based and xanthan gum-based thickeners exhibited different relationships between IDDSI Flow Test and consistometric measurements. Findings allow easy conversion and adaptation of consistometric measures to the IDDSI framework, which renders the use of consistometry in the clinical settings as a complementary quantitative measurement of liquid consistency to IDDSI Flow Test.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于稠度分类的 IDDSI 流动试验与稠度测量之间的关系--对使用淀粉基和黄原胶基增稠剂制备的增稠液体的研究。
简介流质食物的稠度在吞咽困难患者的管理中起着重要作用,可通过 IDDSI 流量测试和稠度测量法进行客观评估。本研究确定了 IDDSI 流量测试和稠度测量之间的关系,并检查了与使用淀粉基和黄原胶基增稠剂制备的增稠液体相关的每种测试的测量局限性:使用淀粉基和黄原胶基增稠剂制备了 13 种增稠液体样品,稠度从 IDDSI 1 级(轻度稠)到 3 级(中度稠)不等。获得了 IDDSI 流量测试和稠度测量值,并使用相关和回归方法进行了分析:结果:两种测试之间存在很强的相关性。回归分析表明,IDDSI 流量测试和稠度测量值之间分别存在线性和二次关系:淀粉基和黄原胶基增稠剂在 IDDSI 流动试验和稠度测量之间表现出不同的关系。研究结果使稠度测量法易于转换和适应 IDDSI 框架,从而使稠度测量法可在临床环境中作为 IDDSI 流量测试的补充定量测量液体稠度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1947, ''Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica'' provides a forum for international research on the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of structures of the speech, language, and hearing mechanisms. Original papers published in this journal report new findings on basic function, assessment, management, and test development in communication sciences and disorders, as well as experiments designed to test specific theories of speech, language, and hearing function. Review papers of high quality are also welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Influence of Carnatic vocal training on voice measures in males. Effects of Suspension Pharyngeal Flap on Speech in Filipino Individuals with Velopharyngeal Insufficiency. Estimates of Speech Efficiency in Monolingual and Bilingual Speakers of English. Relationship between IDDSI Flow Test and Consistometric Measures for Consistency Classification - An Examination of Thickened Liquids Prepared Using Starch-Based and Xanthan Gum-Based Thickening Agents. Acoustic Character Governing Variation in Normal, Benign, and Malignant Voices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1