Futility of Up-Front Resection for Anatomically Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY JAMA surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2485
Stefano Crippa, Giuseppe Malleo, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Serena Langella, Claudio Ricci, Fabio Casciani, Giulio Belfiori, Sara Galati, Vincenzo D'Ambra, Gabriella Lionetto, Alessandro Ferrero, Riccardo Casadei, Giorgio Ercolani, Roberto Salvia, Massimo Falconi, Alessandro Cucchetti
{"title":"Futility of Up-Front Resection for Anatomically Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.","authors":"Stefano Crippa, Giuseppe Malleo, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Serena Langella, Claudio Ricci, Fabio Casciani, Giulio Belfiori, Sara Galati, Vincenzo D'Ambra, Gabriella Lionetto, Alessandro Ferrero, Riccardo Casadei, Giorgio Ercolani, Roberto Salvia, Massimo Falconi, Alessandro Cucchetti","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There are currently no clinically relevant criteria to predict a futile up-front pancreatectomy in patients with anatomically resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a futility risk model using a multi-institutional database and provide unified criteria associated with a futility likelihood below a safety threshold of 20%.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective study took place from January 2010 through December 2021 at 5 high- or very high-volume centers in Italy. Data were analyzed during April 2024. Participants included consecutive patients undergoing up-front pancreatectomy at the participating institutions.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Standard management, per existing guidelines.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcome measure was the rate of futile pancreatectomy, defined as an operation resulting in patient death or disease recurrence within 6 months. Dichotomous criteria were constructed to maintain the futility likelihood below 20%, corresponding to the chance of not receiving postneoadjuvant resection from existing pooled data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 1426 patients. The median age was 69 (interquartile range, 62-75) years, 759 patients were male (53.2%), and 1076 had head cancer (75.4%). The rate of adjuvant treatment receipt was 73.7%. For the model construction, the study sample was split into a derivation (n = 885) and a validation cohort (n = 541). The rate of futile pancreatectomy was 18.9% (19.2% in the development and 18.6% in the validation cohort). Preoperative variables associated with futile resection were American Society of Anesthesiologists class (95% CI for coefficients, 0.68-0.87), cancer antigen (CA) 19.9 serum levels (95% CI, for coefficients 0.05-0.75), and tumor size (95% CI for coefficients, 0.28-0.46). Three risk groups associated with an escalating likelihood of futile resection, worse pathological features, and worse outcomes were identified. Four discrete conditions (defined as CA 19.9 levels-adjusted-to-size criteria: tumor size less than 2 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 1000 U/mL; tumor size less than 3 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 500 U/mL; tumor size less than 4 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 150 U/mL; and tumor size less than 5 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 50 U/mL) were associated with a futility likelihood below 20%. Both disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer in patients fulfilling the criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, a preoperative model (MetroPancreas) and dichotomous criteria to determine the risk of futile pancreatectomy were developed. This might help in selecting patients for up-front resection or neoadjuvant therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1139-1147"},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2485","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: There are currently no clinically relevant criteria to predict a futile up-front pancreatectomy in patients with anatomically resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Objectives: To develop a futility risk model using a multi-institutional database and provide unified criteria associated with a futility likelihood below a safety threshold of 20%.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective study took place from January 2010 through December 2021 at 5 high- or very high-volume centers in Italy. Data were analyzed during April 2024. Participants included consecutive patients undergoing up-front pancreatectomy at the participating institutions.

Exposure: Standard management, per existing guidelines.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome measure was the rate of futile pancreatectomy, defined as an operation resulting in patient death or disease recurrence within 6 months. Dichotomous criteria were constructed to maintain the futility likelihood below 20%, corresponding to the chance of not receiving postneoadjuvant resection from existing pooled data.

Results: This study included 1426 patients. The median age was 69 (interquartile range, 62-75) years, 759 patients were male (53.2%), and 1076 had head cancer (75.4%). The rate of adjuvant treatment receipt was 73.7%. For the model construction, the study sample was split into a derivation (n = 885) and a validation cohort (n = 541). The rate of futile pancreatectomy was 18.9% (19.2% in the development and 18.6% in the validation cohort). Preoperative variables associated with futile resection were American Society of Anesthesiologists class (95% CI for coefficients, 0.68-0.87), cancer antigen (CA) 19.9 serum levels (95% CI, for coefficients 0.05-0.75), and tumor size (95% CI for coefficients, 0.28-0.46). Three risk groups associated with an escalating likelihood of futile resection, worse pathological features, and worse outcomes were identified. Four discrete conditions (defined as CA 19.9 levels-adjusted-to-size criteria: tumor size less than 2 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 1000 U/mL; tumor size less than 3 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 500 U/mL; tumor size less than 4 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 150 U/mL; and tumor size less than 5 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 50 U/mL) were associated with a futility likelihood below 20%. Both disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer in patients fulfilling the criteria.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, a preoperative model (MetroPancreas) and dichotomous criteria to determine the risk of futile pancreatectomy were developed. This might help in selecting patients for up-front resection or neoadjuvant therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可切除胰腺癌的前上方切除术是否可行?
重要性:目前还没有与临床相关的标准来预测解剖上可切除的胰腺导管腺癌患者前期胰腺切除术的无效性:利用多机构数据库建立一个无效风险模型,并提供与低于20%安全阈值的无效可能性相关的统一标准:这项回顾性研究于2010年1月至2021年12月在意大利的5个高容量或超高容量中心进行。数据分析于 2024 年 4 月进行。参与者包括在参与机构接受前期胰腺切除术的连续患者:主要结果和测量方法:主要结果测量方法是无效胰腺切除术的发生率,定义为导致患者死亡或6个月内疾病复发的手术。二分法标准的构建是为了将无效可能性维持在20%以下,这与现有汇总数据中未接受新辅助治疗后切除术的几率相对应:本研究共纳入1426名患者。中位年龄为69岁(四分位距为62-75岁),759名患者为男性(53.2%),1076名患者患有头部癌症(75.4%)。接受辅助治疗的比例为 73.7%。为构建模型,研究样本分为推导组群(n = 885)和验证组群(n = 541)。无效胰腺切除率为18.9%(衍生队列为19.2%,验证队列为18.6%)。与无效切除相关的术前变量有美国麻醉医师协会等级(95% CI系数为0.68-0.87)、癌抗原(CA)19.9血清水平(95% CI系数为0.05-0.75)和肿瘤大小(95% CI系数为0.28-0.46)。最终确定了三个风险组别,它们分别与无效切除、病理特征恶化和预后恶化的可能性递增相关。四种不同的情况(CA 19.9水平按肿瘤大小调整后的标准:肿瘤大小小于2厘米,CA 19.9水平小于1000 U/mL;肿瘤大小小于3厘米,CA 19.9水平小于500 U/mL;肿瘤大小小于4厘米,CA 19.9水平小于150 U/mL;肿瘤大小小于5厘米,CA 19.9水平小于50 U/mL)与无效可能性低于20%有关。符合标准的患者无病生存期和总生存期均明显延长:本研究建立了一个术前模型(MetroPancreas)和二分法标准,以确定胰腺切除术无效的风险。这可能有助于选择患者进行前期切除或新辅助治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Facility Medicaid Burden and Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection-Related Mortality. Issues With the New Liver Allocation System. Prophylactic Drain Placement and Postoperative Invasive Procedures After Gastrectomy: The Abdominal Drain After Gastrectomy (ADIGE) Randomized Clinical Trial. Refrain From the Drain? The ADIGE Trial Brings Gastrectomy to the Debate. Risk Factors for Metabolic Disease in Veterans: Beyond BMI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1