Knowledge of Patients' Activation Level Changes Expert US Physicians' Communication in GERD Management.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000002036
Afrin N Kamal, Sudharshan Achalu, Shilpa Jani, George Triadafilopoulos, John O Clarke, C Jason Wang
{"title":"Knowledge of Patients' Activation Level Changes Expert US Physicians' Communication in GERD Management.","authors":"Afrin N Kamal, Sudharshan Achalu, Shilpa Jani, George Triadafilopoulos, John O Clarke, C Jason Wang","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common. Treatment is to manage symptoms, but medication nonadherence is common. To date, little emphasis has been on understanding patient behaviors and reasons for medication nonadherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional survey study among expert gastroenterologists specializing in esophageal disease. Survey studies consisted of a 6-item questionnaire measuring physician knowledge of patient activation, the Clinician Support for Patient Activation Measure (CS-PAM), and an adapted 20-item Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). All question stems were specified to GERD management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six experts participated. Most indicated hearing the term patient engagement before this survey (88.9%), but fewer were aware of the term patient activation (33.3%). Respondents were then made aware of the clinical significance of patient activation and asked, based on this knowledge, the likelihood that patients' activation level before the clinic would impact their communication. Responses varied between \"to a great extent\" and \"not at all.\" Overall, CS-PAM activation scores were high, indicating a high level of support for patient activation. Lastly, respondents indicated their frequency of participating in partnership-building behaviors with patients. More than half (52.8%) of expert physicians \"almost always\" asked how GERD affected their lives, while less often asked patients about their health habits (22.2%), help set specific goals to improve their eating or exercise lifestyle (19.4%), or refer patients to a dietician, health educator, or counselor for their GERD (11.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient activation is an important strategy and may provide a behavioral approach to address medication adherence in GERD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common. Treatment is to manage symptoms, but medication nonadherence is common. To date, little emphasis has been on understanding patient behaviors and reasons for medication nonadherence.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional survey study among expert gastroenterologists specializing in esophageal disease. Survey studies consisted of a 6-item questionnaire measuring physician knowledge of patient activation, the Clinician Support for Patient Activation Measure (CS-PAM), and an adapted 20-item Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). All question stems were specified to GERD management.

Results: Thirty-six experts participated. Most indicated hearing the term patient engagement before this survey (88.9%), but fewer were aware of the term patient activation (33.3%). Respondents were then made aware of the clinical significance of patient activation and asked, based on this knowledge, the likelihood that patients' activation level before the clinic would impact their communication. Responses varied between "to a great extent" and "not at all." Overall, CS-PAM activation scores were high, indicating a high level of support for patient activation. Lastly, respondents indicated their frequency of participating in partnership-building behaviors with patients. More than half (52.8%) of expert physicians "almost always" asked how GERD affected their lives, while less often asked patients about their health habits (22.2%), help set specific goals to improve their eating or exercise lifestyle (19.4%), or refer patients to a dietician, health educator, or counselor for their GERD (11.1%).

Conclusion: Patient activation is an important strategy and may provide a behavioral approach to address medication adherence in GERD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国胃食管反流病管理专家对患者激活水平变化的认识》(Knowledge of Patients' Activation Level Changes Expert US Physicians' Communication in GERD Management)。
背景:胃食管反流病(GERD)很常见。治疗的目的是控制症状,但不遵医嘱用药的现象很普遍。迄今为止,人们很少重视了解患者的行为和不坚持用药的原因:方法:我们对食道疾病专业的胃肠病专家进行了一项横断面调查研究。调查研究包括一份测量医生对患者激活知识的 6 个项目的问卷、临床医生对患者激活的支持测量(CS-PAM)和一份改编的 20 个项目的慢性病患者护理评估(PACIC)。所有问题均针对胃食管反流病的治疗:结果:36 位专家参与了此次调查。大多数人表示在调查之前听说过 "患者参与 "这一术语(88.9%),但知道 "患者激活 "这一术语的人较少(33.3%)。受访者随后了解了患者激活的临床意义,并被问及,基于这些知识,患者在门诊前的激活水平会对他们的沟通产生何种影响。回答介于 "很大程度上 "和 "完全不会 "之间。总体而言,CS-PAM 的激活得分很高,表明对患者激活的支持程度很高。最后,受访者指出了他们参与与患者建立伙伴关系行为的频率。半数以上(52.8%)的专家医生 "几乎总是 "询问胃食管反流病对他们的生活有何影响,而较少询问患者的健康习惯(22.2%)、帮助制定改善饮食或运动生活方式的具体目标(19.4%),或将患者转介给营养师、健康教育者或胃食管反流病咨询师(11.1%):患者激活是一种重要的策略,可以为胃食管反流病患者提供一种行为方法来解决服药依从性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Colonoscopy Use Among Asian Indians in New York City, 2003 to 2016. Application of a Machine Learning Predictive Model for Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis. FIB-4 as a Time-varying Covariate and Its Association With Severe Liver Disease in Primary Care: A Time-dependent Cox Regression Analysis. Cold Versus Hot Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Sessile Serrated Colorectal Polyps ≥10 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Safety of Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy Placement Compared With Surgical and Radiologic Jejunostomy Placement: A Nationwide Inpatient Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1