Midline Catheters as an Alternative for Central Venous Catheters in Venous Oxygen Saturation Monitoring: A Single Center Experience.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1177/08850666241265190
Justin S Kim, Sasa Ivanovic, Danielle Davison, Rishika Bheem, Maria Wu, Brendan Sweeney, Eduard Shaykhinurov, David Yamane
{"title":"Midline Catheters as an Alternative for Central Venous Catheters in Venous Oxygen Saturation Monitoring: A Single Center Experience.","authors":"Justin S Kim, Sasa Ivanovic, Danielle Davison, Rishika Bheem, Maria Wu, Brendan Sweeney, Eduard Shaykhinurov, David Yamane","doi":"10.1177/08850666241265190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) obtained from a central venous catheter (CVC) is often used to approximate oxygen delivery in critically ill patients. Despite their importance in administering medications and monitoring oxygen delivery, the use of CVCs can be associated with significant complications. Midline catheters are inserted via a peripheral vein above the antecubital fossa and provide a safe alternative to CVCs. This study aimed to determine the equivalence of ScvO2 and midline catheter oxygen saturation (SmO2) in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center observational study of critically ill adult patients who had concurrently placed CVCs (internal jugular and subclavian) and midline catheters as part of standard ICU care. Venous oxygen saturation and lactate levels were measured from both catheters using the Abbott point-of-care i-STAT analyzer. Demographic and ICU admission data were collected. Continuous variables were compared using the paired t-test. Pearson's correlation was used to evaluate the linear correlation between ScvO2 and SmO2. The systematic error (bias) was calculated using Bland-Altman analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the sensitivities and specificities for different values of SmO2 to predict ScvO2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight patients (n = 48) were enrolled in the study. The mean ScvO2 and SmO2 were 65.5% +/- 11.2% and 62.7% +/- 17.6% respectively (p = 0.1197). In the Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias between ScvO2 and SmO2 was 2.8% +/- 12.3% with 95% limits of agreement of -21.3% to 26.9%. More than 60% of the ScvO2 and SmO2 values diverged by ≥ 5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The difference between the mean SmO2 and ScvO2 was not statistically significant and the mean bias between SmO2 and ScvO2 is low. Despite this, the substantially large standard deviation and limits of agreement preclude the use of SmO2 as a direct surrogate of ScvO2.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241265190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) obtained from a central venous catheter (CVC) is often used to approximate oxygen delivery in critically ill patients. Despite their importance in administering medications and monitoring oxygen delivery, the use of CVCs can be associated with significant complications. Midline catheters are inserted via a peripheral vein above the antecubital fossa and provide a safe alternative to CVCs. This study aimed to determine the equivalence of ScvO2 and midline catheter oxygen saturation (SmO2) in critically ill patients.

Methods: This was a single-center observational study of critically ill adult patients who had concurrently placed CVCs (internal jugular and subclavian) and midline catheters as part of standard ICU care. Venous oxygen saturation and lactate levels were measured from both catheters using the Abbott point-of-care i-STAT analyzer. Demographic and ICU admission data were collected. Continuous variables were compared using the paired t-test. Pearson's correlation was used to evaluate the linear correlation between ScvO2 and SmO2. The systematic error (bias) was calculated using Bland-Altman analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the sensitivities and specificities for different values of SmO2 to predict ScvO2.

Results: Forty-eight patients (n = 48) were enrolled in the study. The mean ScvO2 and SmO2 were 65.5% +/- 11.2% and 62.7% +/- 17.6% respectively (p = 0.1197). In the Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias between ScvO2 and SmO2 was 2.8% +/- 12.3% with 95% limits of agreement of -21.3% to 26.9%. More than 60% of the ScvO2 and SmO2 values diverged by ≥ 5%.

Conclusions: The difference between the mean SmO2 and ScvO2 was not statistically significant and the mean bias between SmO2 and ScvO2 is low. Despite this, the substantially large standard deviation and limits of agreement preclude the use of SmO2 as a direct surrogate of ScvO2.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉血氧饱和度监测中线导管替代中心静脉导管:单中心经验。
背景:从中心静脉导管(CVC)获得的中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)通常用于估算重症患者的氧输送量。尽管中心静脉导管在给药和监测供氧量方面非常重要,但使用中心静脉导管可能会引起严重的并发症。中线导管通过肘前窝上方的外周静脉插入,是 CVC 的安全替代方案。本研究旨在确定重症患者的 ScvO2 和中线导管血氧饱和度(SmO2)的等效性:这是一项单中心观察性研究,研究对象是重症监护室标准护理中同时置入 CVC(颈内静脉和锁骨下静脉)和中线导管的成年重症患者。使用雅培床旁 i-STAT 分析仪测量了两种导管的静脉血氧饱和度和乳酸水平。收集了人口统计学和 ICU 入院数据。使用配对 t 检验比较连续变量。皮尔逊相关性用于评估 ScvO2 和 SmO2 之间的线性相关。使用 Bland-Altman 分析法计算系统误差(偏差)。构建接收者操作特征曲线以评估不同 SmO2 值预测 ScvO2 的敏感性和特异性:48名患者(n = 48)参加了研究。ScvO2 和 SmO2 的平均值分别为 65.5% +/- 11.2% 和 62.7% +/- 17.6%(p = 0.1197)。在 Bland-Altman 分析中,ScvO2 和 SmO2 之间的平均偏差为 2.8% +/- 12.3%,95% 的一致性范围为 -21.3% 到 26.9%。超过 60% 的 ScvO2 和 SmO2 值偏差≥ 5%:结论:SmO2 和 ScvO2 平均值之间的差异没有统计学意义,SmO2 和 ScvO2 之间的平均偏差较小。尽管如此,较大的标准偏差和一致性限制排除了使用 SmO2 直接替代 ScvO2 的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Sepsis Onset Timing on All-Cause Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Serial Lactate in Clinical Medicine - A Narrative Review. A Combined Model of Vital Signs and Serum Biomarkers Outperforms Shock Index in the Prediction of Hemorrhage Control Interventions in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients. The Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Critically ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anticoagulation Monitoring Strategies During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Therapy - Differences Between Simultaneously Obtained Coagulation Tests: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1