Anthony Tang, Hussein M Abdallah, Yue-Fang Chang, Georgios A Zenonos, Paul A Gardner, Garret W Choby, Eric W Wang, Carl H Snyderman
{"title":"Changes in pituitary adenoma patient presentation and outcomes during the COVID pandemic at a Pituitary Center of Excellence.","authors":"Anthony Tang, Hussein M Abdallah, Yue-Fang Chang, Georgios A Zenonos, Paul A Gardner, Garret W Choby, Eric W Wang, Carl H Snyderman","doi":"10.1007/s11102-024-01435-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to the surgical care of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the pandemic on endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) for patients with a pituitary adenoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from 2015 to 2022 that had EES for a pituitary adenoma were included in this study. Patients were separated into pre-COVID (January 2015-March 2020) and COVID (March 2020-September 2022) groups. Univariate analysis was done using chi-square, fisher exact tests, and t-tests to compare groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 492 patients that had EES for their pituitary adenoma. There were 314 patients in the pre-COVID group and 178 patients in the COVID group. Patients in the COVID group had a higher risk analysis index (RAI) frailty score (15 ± 10 pre-COVID vs. 20 ± 9 COVID, P < 0.001) and a higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status score (3 or 4) (72.0% pre-COVID vs. 81.9% COVID, P = 0.02). There were significantly more macroadenoma cases (87.6% pre-COVID vs. 94.4% COVID, P = 0.02) and extrasellar surgical approaches (45.2% pre-COVID vs. 61.2% COVID, P < 0.001) during COVID. There was no significant difference in length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients that presented during the pandemic tended to be more frail, have more comorbidities, and require additional extrasellar surgical approaches. Despite changes in clinical presentation and operative management, the LOS and readmission rate remained stable during COVID, supporting the safety of this procedure during the recent pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":20202,"journal":{"name":"Pituitary","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pituitary","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-024-01435-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to the surgical care of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the pandemic on endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) for patients with a pituitary adenoma.
Methods: Patients from 2015 to 2022 that had EES for a pituitary adenoma were included in this study. Patients were separated into pre-COVID (January 2015-March 2020) and COVID (March 2020-September 2022) groups. Univariate analysis was done using chi-square, fisher exact tests, and t-tests to compare groups.
Results: This study included 492 patients that had EES for their pituitary adenoma. There were 314 patients in the pre-COVID group and 178 patients in the COVID group. Patients in the COVID group had a higher risk analysis index (RAI) frailty score (15 ± 10 pre-COVID vs. 20 ± 9 COVID, P < 0.001) and a higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status score (3 or 4) (72.0% pre-COVID vs. 81.9% COVID, P = 0.02). There were significantly more macroadenoma cases (87.6% pre-COVID vs. 94.4% COVID, P = 0.02) and extrasellar surgical approaches (45.2% pre-COVID vs. 61.2% COVID, P < 0.001) during COVID. There was no significant difference in length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates between groups.
Conclusions: Patients that presented during the pandemic tended to be more frail, have more comorbidities, and require additional extrasellar surgical approaches. Despite changes in clinical presentation and operative management, the LOS and readmission rate remained stable during COVID, supporting the safety of this procedure during the recent pandemic.
期刊介绍：
Pituitary is an international publication devoted to basic and clinical aspects of the pituitary gland. It is designed to publish original, high quality research in both basic and pituitary function as well as clinical pituitary disease.
The journal considers:
Biology of Pituitary Tumors
Mechanisms of Pituitary Hormone Secretion
Regulation of Pituitary Function
Prospective Clinical Studies of Pituitary Disease
Critical Basic and Clinical Reviews
Pituitary is directed at basic investigators, physiologists, clinical adult and pediatric endocrinologists, neurosurgeons and reproductive endocrinologists interested in the broad field of the pituitary and its disorders. The Editorial Board has been drawn from international experts in basic and clinical endocrinology. The journal offers a rapid turnaround time for review of manuscripts, and the high standard of the journal is maintained by a selective peer-review process which aims to publish only the highest quality manuscripts. Pituitary will foster the publication of creative scholarship as it pertains to the pituitary and will provide a forum for basic scientists and clinicians to publish their high quality pituitary-related work.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
