Early Glasgow Coma Scale Score and Prediction of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Secondary Analysis of Three Harmonized Prehospital Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Prehospital Emergency Care Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1080/10903127.2024.2381048
Nidhi Iyanna, Jack K Donohue, John M Lorence, Francis X Guyette, Elizabeth Gimbel, Joshua B Brown, Brian J Daley, Brian J Eastridge, Richard S Miller, Raminder Nirula, Brian G Harbrecht, Jeffrey A Claridge, Herb A Phelan, Gary A Vercruysse, Terence O'Keefe, Bellal Joseph, Lori A Shutter, Jason L Sperry
{"title":"Early Glasgow Coma Scale Score and Prediction of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Secondary Analysis of Three Harmonized Prehospital Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Nidhi Iyanna, Jack K Donohue, John M Lorence, Francis X Guyette, Elizabeth Gimbel, Joshua B Brown, Brian J Daley, Brian J Eastridge, Richard S Miller, Raminder Nirula, Brian G Harbrecht, Jeffrey A Claridge, Herb A Phelan, Gary A Vercruysse, Terence O'Keefe, Bellal Joseph, Lori A Shutter, Jason L Sperry","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2381048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The prehospital prediction of the radiographic diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in hemorrhagic shock patients has the potential to promote early therapeutic interventions. However, the identification of TBI is often challenging and prehospital tools remain limited. While the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score is frequently used to assess the extent of impaired consciousness after injury, the utility of the GCS scores in the early prehospital phase of care to predict TBI in patients with severe injury and concomitant shock is poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a post-hoc, secondary analysis utilizing data derived from three randomized prehospital clinical trials: the Prehospital Air Medical Plasma trial (PAMPER), the Study of Tranexamic Acid During Air Medical and Ground Prehospital Transport trial (STAAMP), and the Pragmatic Prehospital Type O Whole Blood Early Resuscitation (PPOWER) trial. Patients were dichotomized into two cohorts based on the presence of TBI and then further stratified into three groups based on prehospital GCS score: GCS 3, GCS 4-12, and GCS 13-15. The association between prehospital GCS score and clinical documentation of TBI was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,490 enrolled patients were included in this analysis. The percentage of patients with documented TBI in those with a GCS 3 was 59.5, 42.4% in those with a GCS 4-12, and 11.8% in those with a GCS 13-15. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the prehospital GCS score for the diagnosis of TBI is low, with a GCS of 3 having only a 60% PPV. Hypotension and prehospital intubation are independent predictors of a low prehospital GCS. Decreasing prehospital GCS is strongly associated with higher incidence or mortality over time, irrespective of the diagnosis of TBI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ability to accurately predict the presence of TBI in the prehospital phase of care is essential. The utility of the GCS scores in the early prehospital phase of care to predict TBI in patients with severe injury and concomitant shock is limited. The use of novel scoring systems and improved technology are needed to promote the accurate early diagnosis of TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2381048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The prehospital prediction of the radiographic diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in hemorrhagic shock patients has the potential to promote early therapeutic interventions. However, the identification of TBI is often challenging and prehospital tools remain limited. While the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score is frequently used to assess the extent of impaired consciousness after injury, the utility of the GCS scores in the early prehospital phase of care to predict TBI in patients with severe injury and concomitant shock is poorly understood.

Methods: We performed a post-hoc, secondary analysis utilizing data derived from three randomized prehospital clinical trials: the Prehospital Air Medical Plasma trial (PAMPER), the Study of Tranexamic Acid During Air Medical and Ground Prehospital Transport trial (STAAMP), and the Pragmatic Prehospital Type O Whole Blood Early Resuscitation (PPOWER) trial. Patients were dichotomized into two cohorts based on the presence of TBI and then further stratified into three groups based on prehospital GCS score: GCS 3, GCS 4-12, and GCS 13-15. The association between prehospital GCS score and clinical documentation of TBI was assessed.

Results: A total of 1,490 enrolled patients were included in this analysis. The percentage of patients with documented TBI in those with a GCS 3 was 59.5, 42.4% in those with a GCS 4-12, and 11.8% in those with a GCS 13-15. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the prehospital GCS score for the diagnosis of TBI is low, with a GCS of 3 having only a 60% PPV. Hypotension and prehospital intubation are independent predictors of a low prehospital GCS. Decreasing prehospital GCS is strongly associated with higher incidence or mortality over time, irrespective of the diagnosis of TBI.

Conclusions: The ability to accurately predict the presence of TBI in the prehospital phase of care is essential. The utility of the GCS scores in the early prehospital phase of care to predict TBI in patients with severe injury and concomitant shock is limited. The use of novel scoring systems and improved technology are needed to promote the accurate early diagnosis of TBI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分与创伤性脑损伤预测:三项统一院前随机临床试验的二次分析。
目的:院前预测失血性休克患者创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的影像学诊断有可能促进早期治疗干预。然而,识别创伤性脑损伤往往具有挑战性,院前工具仍然有限。虽然格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分常用于评估伤后意识受损的程度,但人们对 GCS 评分在院前早期护理阶段预测重伤并伴有休克患者 TBI 的实用性知之甚少。方法:我们利用以下三项随机院前临床试验的数据进行了事后二次分析:院前空中医疗血浆试验(PAMPER)、空中医疗和地面院前转运期间氨甲环酸研究试验(STAAMP)和院前O型全血早期复苏实用试验(PPOWER)。根据是否存在创伤性脑损伤将患者分为两组,然后根据院前 GCS 评分进一步分为三组:GCS 3、GCS 4-12 和 GCS 13-15。评估了院前 GCS 评分与 TBI 临床记录之间的关联。结果:共有 1,490 名入院患者被纳入本次分析。院前 GCS 评分为 3 分的患者中有 TBI 记录的比例为 59.5%,GCS 评分为 4-12 分的患者为 42.4%,GCS 评分为 13-15 分的患者为 11.8%。院前 GCS 评分对 TBI 诊断的阳性预测值(PPV)较低,GCS 为 3 的 PPV 仅为 60%。低血压和院前插管是院前 GCS 偏低的独立预测因素。随着时间的推移,院前 GCS 的下降与较高的发病率或死亡率密切相关,与 TBI 的诊断无关:结论:在院前护理阶段准确预测是否存在创伤性脑损伤的能力至关重要。在院前护理早期阶段,GCS 评分在预测重伤并伴有休克患者的 TBI 方面作用有限。需要使用新型评分系统和改进技术来促进创伤性脑损伤的早期准确诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Key Takeaways and Progress on Leveraging EMS in Overdose Response Among Five Learning Collaborative States. Uses of Fibrinogen Concentrate in Management of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy in the Prehospital Environment: A Scoping Review. Correlation Between EtCO2 and PCO2 in Patients Undergoing Critical Care Transport. The National Association of EMS Physicians Compendium of Prehospital Trauma Management Position Statements and Resource Documents. Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Fluid Resuscitation in Trauma- a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1