Pharmacotherapy assessment and adverse drug reactions in older patients admitted to intensive care.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1016/j.farma.2024.06.003
Fabiana Angelo Marques Carizio, Isabella do Vale de Souza, Alan Maicon de Oliveira, Maria Madalena Corrêa Melo, Maria Olívia Barbosa Zanetti, Fabiana Rossi Varallo, Leonardo Régis Leira-Pereira
{"title":"Pharmacotherapy assessment and adverse drug reactions in older patients admitted to intensive care.","authors":"Fabiana Angelo Marques Carizio, Isabella do Vale de Souza, Alan Maicon de Oliveira, Maria Madalena Corrêa Melo, Maria Olívia Barbosa Zanetti, Fabiana Rossi Varallo, Leonardo Régis Leira-Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older patients are more susceptible to medication use, and physiological changes resulting from aging and organic dysfunctions presented by critically ill patients may alter the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic behavior. Thus, critically ill older people present greater vulnerability to the occurrence of pharmacotherapeutic problems.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate pharmacotherapy and the development of potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in older patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cohort study was conducted in an ICU for adults of a Brazilian University Hospital during a 12-month period. The patients' pharmacotherapy was evaluated daily, considering the occurrence of ADRs and drug-drug interactions (DDIs), the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for older people, and the pharmacotherapy anticholinergic burden (ACB). A trigger tool was used for active search of ADRs, with subsequent causality evaluation. PIM use was evaluated by means of the Beers criteria and the STOPP/START criteria. The ABC scale was employed to estimate ACB. The Micromedex® and Drugs.com® medication databases were employed to evaluate the DDIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample of this study consisted of 41 patients, with a mean age of 66.8 years old (±5.2). The 22 triggers used assisted in identifying 15 potential ADRs, and 26.8% of the patients developed them. The mean estimated ACB score was 3.0 (±1.8), and the patients used 3.1 (±1.4) and 3.3 (±1.6) PIMs according to the Beers and the STOPP criteria, respectively. A total of 672 DDIs were identified, with a mean of 16.8 (±9.5) DDIs/patient during ICU hospitalization. Our findings show an association between occurrence of ADRs in the ICU and polypharmacy (p=.03) and DDIs (p=.007), corroborating efforts for rational medication use as a preventive strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using tools to evaluate the pharmacotherapy for older people in intensive care can assist in the recognition and prevention of pharmacotherapeutic problems, with emphasis on the identification of ADRs through the observation of triggers and subsequent causality analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2024.06.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Older patients are more susceptible to medication use, and physiological changes resulting from aging and organic dysfunctions presented by critically ill patients may alter the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic behavior. Thus, critically ill older people present greater vulnerability to the occurrence of pharmacotherapeutic problems.

Objective: To evaluate pharmacotherapy and the development of potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in older patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).

Method: A cohort study was conducted in an ICU for adults of a Brazilian University Hospital during a 12-month period. The patients' pharmacotherapy was evaluated daily, considering the occurrence of ADRs and drug-drug interactions (DDIs), the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for older people, and the pharmacotherapy anticholinergic burden (ACB). A trigger tool was used for active search of ADRs, with subsequent causality evaluation. PIM use was evaluated by means of the Beers criteria and the STOPP/START criteria. The ABC scale was employed to estimate ACB. The Micromedex® and Drugs.com® medication databases were employed to evaluate the DDIs.

Results: The sample of this study consisted of 41 patients, with a mean age of 66.8 years old (±5.2). The 22 triggers used assisted in identifying 15 potential ADRs, and 26.8% of the patients developed them. The mean estimated ACB score was 3.0 (±1.8), and the patients used 3.1 (±1.4) and 3.3 (±1.6) PIMs according to the Beers and the STOPP criteria, respectively. A total of 672 DDIs were identified, with a mean of 16.8 (±9.5) DDIs/patient during ICU hospitalization. Our findings show an association between occurrence of ADRs in the ICU and polypharmacy (p=.03) and DDIs (p=.007), corroborating efforts for rational medication use as a preventive strategy.

Conclusions: Using tools to evaluate the pharmacotherapy for older people in intensive care can assist in the recognition and prevention of pharmacotherapeutic problems, with emphasis on the identification of ADRs through the observation of triggers and subsequent causality analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
入住重症监护室的老年患者的药物治疗评估和药物不良反应。
导言:老年患者更容易用药,危重病人因衰老和器质性功能障碍导致的生理变化可能会改变药代动力学或药效学行为。因此,老年重症患者更容易出现药物治疗问题:评估入住重症监护室(ICU)的老年患者的药物治疗和潜在药物不良反应(ADR)的发生情况:方法:在巴西一所大学医院的成人重症监护室开展了一项为期 12 个月的队列研究。每天都对患者的药物治疗进行评估,同时考虑到不良反应和药物相互作用(DDI)的发生率、老年人潜在不适当药物(PIM)的使用情况以及抗胆碱能药物治疗负担(ACB)。使用触发工具主动搜索 ADR,然后进行因果关系评估。根据 Beers 标准和 STOPP/START 标准对 PIM 的使用情况进行评估。采用 ABC 量表估算 ACB。Micromedex® 和 Drugs.com® 药物数据库用于评估 DDIs:本研究的样本包括 41 名患者,平均年龄为 66.8 岁(±5.2)。所使用的 22 种触发因素帮助确定了 15 种潜在的 ADR,26.8% 的患者出现了 ADR。根据 Beers 和 STOPP 标准,ACB 的平均估计分数为 3.0 (±1.8),患者使用的 PIM 分别为 3.1 (±1.4) 和 3.3 (±1.6)。在重症监护病房住院期间,共发现了 672 例 DDI,平均每名患者有 16.8 (±9.5) 例 DDI。我们的研究结果表明,ICU ADRs 的发生与多药治疗(p=.03)和 DDIs(p=.007)之间存在关联,这证实了合理用药是一种预防策略:使用工具评估重症监护室老年人的药物治疗有助于识别和预防药物治疗问题,重点是通过观察诱发因素和随后的因果关系分析来识别 ADR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the situation of pharmaceutical care for patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Treatment adherence to oral chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non- small cell lung cancer: Protocol for a hospital pharmacy-based real-world study. Pharmacokinetic-guided switching from standard half-life factor VIII to extended half-life pegylated factor VIII in the therapy of hemophilia A in clinical practice. Prospective observational follow-up study of psychoactive drugs treatment initiated in the intensive care unit. Protocol for the adaptation and consensus of the Community Pharmacy Survey on Patient Safety Culture to hospital pharmacy in Spain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1