Online information about oral health in autism spectrum disorder: Is it good enough?

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Special Care in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1111/scd.13045
Yara Flaifl, Yazan Hassona, Dana Altoum, Nada Flaifl, Dina Taimeh
{"title":"Online information about oral health in autism spectrum disorder: Is it good enough?","authors":"Yara Flaifl, Yazan Hassona, Dana Altoum, Nada Flaifl, Dina Taimeh","doi":"10.1111/scd.13045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of the internet has surged significantly over the years. Patients and caregivers of patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) might consult the internet for oral health-related information. Hence, this study aimed to assess the quality and readability of online information available in the English language regarding oral health in ASD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online search using Google.com was conducted using the terms \"Autism and dental care,\" \"Autism and oral health,\" and \"Autism and dentistry\". The first 100 websites for each term were screened. Quality of information was assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for printed material (PEMAT-P) and the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmarks. A PEMAT score higher than 70% is considered acceptable for readability and actionability. The JAMA benchmarks are authorship, attribution, disclosure, and currency. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch reading ease score and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) readability formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 300 screened websites, 66 were eventually included. The mean PEMAT understandability and actionability scores were 77.13%, and 42.12%, respectively. Only 12.1% of the websites displayed all four JAMA benchmarks. The mean Flesch score was 10th-12th grade level, and the mean SMOG score was 10th grade level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the understandability of the information was acceptable, the readability and actionability were too challenging for lay people. Health care professionals and organizations involved in patient education should place more efforts in promoting the quality of online information targeting patients with ASD.</p>","PeriodicalId":47470,"journal":{"name":"Special Care in Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Care in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.13045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of the internet has surged significantly over the years. Patients and caregivers of patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) might consult the internet for oral health-related information. Hence, this study aimed to assess the quality and readability of online information available in the English language regarding oral health in ASD.

Methods: Online search using Google.com was conducted using the terms "Autism and dental care," "Autism and oral health," and "Autism and dentistry". The first 100 websites for each term were screened. Quality of information was assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for printed material (PEMAT-P) and the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmarks. A PEMAT score higher than 70% is considered acceptable for readability and actionability. The JAMA benchmarks are authorship, attribution, disclosure, and currency. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch reading ease score and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) readability formula.

Results: Out of the 300 screened websites, 66 were eventually included. The mean PEMAT understandability and actionability scores were 77.13%, and 42.12%, respectively. Only 12.1% of the websites displayed all four JAMA benchmarks. The mean Flesch score was 10th-12th grade level, and the mean SMOG score was 10th grade level.

Conclusion: While the understandability of the information was acceptable, the readability and actionability were too challenging for lay people. Health care professionals and organizations involved in patient education should place more efforts in promoting the quality of online information targeting patients with ASD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有关自闭症谱系障碍口腔健康的在线信息:够好吗?
简介近年来,互联网的使用率大幅上升。自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者及其照护者可能会通过互联网查询与口腔健康相关的信息。因此,本研究旨在评估有关自闭症谱系障碍口腔健康的英语在线信息的质量和可读性:使用 "自闭症与牙科护理"、"自闭症与口腔健康 "和 "自闭症与牙科 "等词在 Google.com 上进行在线搜索。筛选了每个词的前 100 个网站。信息质量采用印刷材料患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT-P)和《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准进行评估。在可读性和可操作性方面,PEMAT 得分高于 70% 即可接受。JAMA 基准是作者身份、署名、信息披露和时效性。可读性使用 Flesch 阅读难易度评分和 Simple Measure of Gobbledygook(SMOG)可读性公式进行评估:结果:在筛选出的 300 个网站中,最终有 66 个被收录。PEMAT 可理解性和可操作性的平均得分分别为 77.13% 和 42.12%。只有 12.1%的网站达到了《美国医学会杂志》的所有四项基准。Flesch 评分的平均值为 10-12 年级水平,SMOG 评分的平均值为 10 年级水平:结论:虽然信息的可理解性是可以接受的,但可读性和可操作性对于非专业人士来说太具有挑战性。参与患者教育的医护人员和机构应加大力度,提高针对 ASD 患者的在线信息的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Special Care in Dentistry
Special Care in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Special Care in Dentistry is the official journal of the Special Care Dentistry Association, the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for Persons with Disabilities, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. It is the only journal published in North America devoted to improving oral health in people with special needs.
期刊最新文献
Oral complications associated with trigeminal trophic syndrome: A case report. Are orofacial pain assessment tools for adults who cannot self-report pain suitable for dental practice? A scoping review. Dentistry and Sturge-Weber syndrome: Case report and narrative review. Geriatric dentistry course effect against ageism among dental students: A cohort study. Exploring the oral health status of children living with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE): A caregiver described self-report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1