Is Hooke's law applicable to an orthodontic cantilever?

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.06.018
Hyung-Kyu Noh, Chang-Seok Park, Ho-Jin Kim, Hyo-Sang Park
{"title":"Is Hooke's law applicable to an orthodontic cantilever?","authors":"Hyung-Kyu Noh, Chang-Seok Park, Ho-Jin Kim, Hyo-Sang Park","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the load-deflection characteristics of an orthodontic cantilever by using the large deflection elastic model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We experimentally measured the vertical deflections of a cantilever with round or rectangular cross-sections, with lengths of 20 mm and 30 mm, and made of either stainless steel or titanium molybdenum alloy. The measurements were obtained under clinically relevant loading ranges (20-60 g of force for round and 20-140 g of force for rectangular wires) and compared with theoretical predictions derived from small and large deflection elastic models. Load-deflection and tangent stiffness curves were subsequently plotted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The impact of a permanent deformation was clinically insignificant. The stiffness of the cantilever increased with the load or deflection rather than remaining constant. Within the clinical loading range, we identified stiffness reversal loading values at which the stiffness of titanium molybdenum alloy surpassed that of stainless steel. The textbook guidelines on cantilevers can apply only when the vertical deflection remains within 16% of its length.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the typical clinical loading range, the load-deflection relationship of a cantilever deviates from Hooke's law because of the prominent deflection trait. The conventional model remains effective when the vertical deflection is within 16% of the cantilever length. Otherwise, it is advisable to determine the load and stiffness on the basis of actual measurements rather than relying on theoretical predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.06.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to analyze the load-deflection characteristics of an orthodontic cantilever by using the large deflection elastic model.

Methods: We experimentally measured the vertical deflections of a cantilever with round or rectangular cross-sections, with lengths of 20 mm and 30 mm, and made of either stainless steel or titanium molybdenum alloy. The measurements were obtained under clinically relevant loading ranges (20-60 g of force for round and 20-140 g of force for rectangular wires) and compared with theoretical predictions derived from small and large deflection elastic models. Load-deflection and tangent stiffness curves were subsequently plotted.

Results: The impact of a permanent deformation was clinically insignificant. The stiffness of the cantilever increased with the load or deflection rather than remaining constant. Within the clinical loading range, we identified stiffness reversal loading values at which the stiffness of titanium molybdenum alloy surpassed that of stainless steel. The textbook guidelines on cantilevers can apply only when the vertical deflection remains within 16% of its length.

Conclusions: Within the typical clinical loading range, the load-deflection relationship of a cantilever deviates from Hooke's law because of the prominent deflection trait. The conventional model remains effective when the vertical deflection is within 16% of the cantilever length. Otherwise, it is advisable to determine the load and stiffness on the basis of actual measurements rather than relying on theoretical predictions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胡克定律是否适用于正畸悬臂?
引言本研究旨在利用大挠度弹性模型分析正畸悬臂的载荷-挠度特性:我们通过实验测量了长度为 20 毫米和 30 毫米的圆形或矩形悬臂的垂直挠度,悬臂由不锈钢或钛钼合金制成。测量结果是在临床相关的加载范围(圆形丝 20-60 g 力,矩形丝 20-140 g 力)下获得的,并与根据小挠度和大挠度弹性模型得出的理论预测值进行了比较。随后绘制了载荷-挠度和切线刚度曲线:结果:永久变形对临床影响不大。悬臂的刚度随载荷或挠度的增加而增加,而不是保持不变。在临床加载范围内,我们确定了钛钼合金刚度超过不锈钢刚度的反向加载值。只有当垂直挠度保持在悬臂长度的 16% 以内时,教科书上的悬臂指南才能适用:在典型的临床载荷范围内,悬臂的载荷-挠度关系偏离了胡克定律,因为挠度特征非常明显。当垂直挠度不超过悬臂长度的 16% 时,传统模型仍然有效。否则,建议根据实际测量结果确定荷载和刚度,而不是依赖理论预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
432
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
期刊最新文献
Mesiodistal tip expression of mandibular anterior teeth in patients with mandibular incisor extraction treated with Invisalign aligners. Directly printed aligner therapy: A 12-month evaluation of application and effectiveness. The periodontal ligament-periosteum sandwich hypothesis: A thought experiment on fenestrations and dehiscences. Comparison of microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on different orthodontic aligners. Evaluating anchorage and torque control in adolescent patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion among 3 appliances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1