Hyung-Kyu Noh, Chang-Seok Park, Ho-Jin Kim, Hyo-Sang Park
{"title":"Is Hooke’s law applicable to an orthodontic cantilever?","authors":"Hyung-Kyu Noh, Chang-Seok Park, Ho-Jin Kim, Hyo-Sang Park","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to analyze the load-deflection characteristics of an orthodontic cantilever by using the large deflection elastic model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We experimentally measured the vertical deflections of a cantilever with round or rectangular cross-sections, with lengths of 20 mm and 30 mm, and made of either stainless steel or titanium molybdenum alloy. The measurements were obtained under clinically relevant loading ranges (20-60 g of force for round and 20-140 g of force for rectangular wires) and compared with theoretical predictions derived from small and large deflection elastic models. Load-deflection and tangent stiffness curves were subsequently plotted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The impact of a permanent deformation was clinically insignificant. The stiffness of the cantilever increased with the load or deflection rather than remaining constant. Within the clinical loading range, we identified stiffness reversal loading values at which the stiffness of titanium molybdenum alloy surpassed that of stainless steel. The textbook guidelines on cantilevers can apply only when the vertical deflection remains within 16% of its length.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Within the typical clinical loading range, the load-deflection relationship of a cantilever deviates from Hooke’s law because of the prominent deflection trait. The conventional model remains effective when the vertical deflection is within 16% of the cantilever length. Otherwise, it is advisable to determine the load and stiffness on the basis of actual measurements rather than relying on theoretical predictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 5","pages":"Pages 458-468.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624002695","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
This study aimed to analyze the load-deflection characteristics of an orthodontic cantilever by using the large deflection elastic model.
Methods
We experimentally measured the vertical deflections of a cantilever with round or rectangular cross-sections, with lengths of 20 mm and 30 mm, and made of either stainless steel or titanium molybdenum alloy. The measurements were obtained under clinically relevant loading ranges (20-60 g of force for round and 20-140 g of force for rectangular wires) and compared with theoretical predictions derived from small and large deflection elastic models. Load-deflection and tangent stiffness curves were subsequently plotted.
Results
The impact of a permanent deformation was clinically insignificant. The stiffness of the cantilever increased with the load or deflection rather than remaining constant. Within the clinical loading range, we identified stiffness reversal loading values at which the stiffness of titanium molybdenum alloy surpassed that of stainless steel. The textbook guidelines on cantilevers can apply only when the vertical deflection remains within 16% of its length.
Conclusions
Within the typical clinical loading range, the load-deflection relationship of a cantilever deviates from Hooke’s law because of the prominent deflection trait. The conventional model remains effective when the vertical deflection is within 16% of the cantilever length. Otherwise, it is advisable to determine the load and stiffness on the basis of actual measurements rather than relying on theoretical predictions.
期刊介绍:
Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.