Factors Associated With Palliative Care Birth Planning at a Pediatric Hospital

Gwendolyn J. Richner, Catherine A. Kelly-Langen, Stephanie S. Allen, Miraides F. Brown, Daniel H. Grossoehme, Sarah Friebert
{"title":"Factors Associated With Palliative Care Birth Planning at a Pediatric Hospital","authors":"Gwendolyn J. Richner,&nbsp;Catherine A. Kelly-Langen,&nbsp;Stephanie S. Allen,&nbsp;Miraides F. Brown,&nbsp;Daniel H. Grossoehme,&nbsp;Sarah Friebert","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify factors associated with the receipt, completion, and goals of palliative care birth plans during the prenatal period.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective observational study of medical record data.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Midwestern U.S. quaternary pediatric hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Maternal–fetal dyads who received maternal–fetal medicine and palliative care from July 2016 through June 2021 (<em>N</em> = 128).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using demographic and clinical predictors, we performed descriptive statistics, group comparisons (chi-square or Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test or Student <em>t</em> test), and logistic regression for three outcomes: birth plan offered, birth plan completed, and goals of care (comfort-focused vs. other).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 128 dyads, 60% (<em>n</em> = 77) received birth plans, 30% (<em>n</em> = 23) completed them, and 31% (<em>n</em> = 40) expressed comfort-focused goals. Participants with comfort-focused goals compared to other goals were more likely to receive birth plans, odds ratio (OR) = 7.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.73, 29.9], <em>p</em> = .01. Participants of non-Black minority races had lower odds of being offered birth plans when compared to White participants, OR = 0.11, 95% CI [0.02, 0.68], <em>p</em> = .02. Odds of being offered (OR = 11.54, 95% CI [2.12, 62.81], <em>p</em> = .005) and completing (OR = 4.37, 95% CI [1.71, 11.17], <em>p</em> &lt; .001) the birth plan increased with each prenatal palliative care visit. Compared to those without, those with neurological (OR = 9.32, 95% CI [2.60, 33.38], <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and genetic (OR = 4.21, 95% CI [1.04, 17.06], <em>p</em> = .04) diagnoses had increased odds of comfort-focused goals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Quality improvement efforts should address variation in the frequency at which birth plans are offered. Increasing palliative care follow-up may improve completion of the birth plan.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 625-634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088421752400248X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To identify factors associated with the receipt, completion, and goals of palliative care birth plans during the prenatal period.

Design

Retrospective observational study of medical record data.

Setting

Midwestern U.S. quaternary pediatric hospital.

Participants

Maternal–fetal dyads who received maternal–fetal medicine and palliative care from July 2016 through June 2021 (N = 128).

Methods

Using demographic and clinical predictors, we performed descriptive statistics, group comparisons (chi-square or Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test or Student t test), and logistic regression for three outcomes: birth plan offered, birth plan completed, and goals of care (comfort-focused vs. other).

Results

Of 128 dyads, 60% (n = 77) received birth plans, 30% (n = 23) completed them, and 31% (n = 40) expressed comfort-focused goals. Participants with comfort-focused goals compared to other goals were more likely to receive birth plans, odds ratio (OR) = 7.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.73, 29.9], p = .01. Participants of non-Black minority races had lower odds of being offered birth plans when compared to White participants, OR = 0.11, 95% CI [0.02, 0.68], p = .02. Odds of being offered (OR = 11.54, 95% CI [2.12, 62.81], p = .005) and completing (OR = 4.37, 95% CI [1.71, 11.17], p < .001) the birth plan increased with each prenatal palliative care visit. Compared to those without, those with neurological (OR = 9.32, 95% CI [2.60, 33.38], p < .001) and genetic (OR = 4.21, 95% CI [1.04, 17.06], p = .04) diagnoses had increased odds of comfort-focused goals.

Conclusion

Quality improvement efforts should address variation in the frequency at which birth plans are offered. Increasing palliative care follow-up may improve completion of the birth plan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科医院姑息治疗分娩计划的相关因素。
目的确定与产前期间接受、完成姑息关怀分娩计划并制定其目标相关的因素:设计:对医疗记录数据进行回顾性观察研究:研究地点:美国中西部四级儿科医院:2016年7月至2021年6月期间接受母胎医学和姑息治疗的母胎二人组(N = 128):利用人口统计学和临床预测因素,我们对三种结果进行了描述性统计、分组比较(秩和检验或费舍尔精确检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验或Student t检验)和逻辑回归:提供的分娩计划、完成的分娩计划和护理目标(以舒适为主与其他):结果:在 128 对夫妇中,60%(n = 77)接受了分娩计划,30%(n = 23)完成了分娩计划,31%(n = 40)表达了以舒适为重点的目标。与其他目标相比,以舒适为目标的参与者更有可能接受分娩计划,几率比(OR)= 7.20,95% 置信区间(CI)[1.73, 29.9],P = .01。与白人参与者相比,非黑人少数民族参与者获得生育计划的几率较低,OR = 0.11,95% 置信区间 [0.02,0.68],P = .02。每次产前姑息治疗就诊后,获得分娩计划的几率(OR = 11.54,95% CI [2.12,62.81],p = .005)和完成分娩计划的几率(OR = 4.37,95% CI [1.71,11.17],p < .001)都会增加。与无神经系统(OR = 9.32,95% CI [2.60,33.38],p < .001)和遗传学(OR = 4.21,95% CI [1.04,17.06],p = .04)诊断的产妇相比,有神经系统(OR = 9.32,95% CI [2.60,33.38],p < .001)诊断的产妇有更多机会实现以舒适为重点的目标:结论:质量改进工作应解决提供分娩计划频率的差异问题。增加姑息关怀随访可提高分娩计划的完成率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
期刊最新文献
Case Report of Dysphoric Milk Ejection Reflex. Meta-ethnography of the Experiences of Women of Color Who Survived Severe Maternal Morbidity or Birth Complications. Secondary Qualitative Analysis of Stigmatizing and Nonstigmatizing Language Used in Hospital Birth Settings. Mental Health Experiences of Muslim American Women During the Perinatal Period. Nurse Perceptions of Barriers to Infection Prevention and Control in Labor and Delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1