Good Death and Quality of End-of-Life Care in Patients with Coexisting Cancer and Dementia: Perspective of Bereaved Families.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2024-07-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2023.0083
Ayumi Takao, Harue Arao, Sena Yamamoto, Miwa Aoki, Katsuyasu Kouda, Tatsuya Morita, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Satoru Tsuneto, Yasuo Shima, Kento Masukawa, Mitsunori Miyashita
{"title":"Good Death and Quality of End-of-Life Care in Patients with Coexisting Cancer and Dementia: Perspective of Bereaved Families.","authors":"Ayumi Takao, Harue Arao, Sena Yamamoto, Miwa Aoki, Katsuyasu Kouda, Tatsuya Morita, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Satoru Tsuneto, Yasuo Shima, Kento Masukawa, Mitsunori Miyashita","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2023.0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with coexisting cancer and dementia often have complex health care needs and face challenges in achieving a good death.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate good death achievement and end-of-life (EOL) care in patients with coexisting cancer and dementia from the perspective of bereaved families.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional nationwide postal survey.</p><p><strong>Setting/subjects: </strong>Bereaved families of patients with cancer who died in hospice and palliative care units across Japan.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Bereaved families completed an anonymous, self-reported questionnaire. Their perspective on achieving a good death was assessed using the Good Death Inventory (GDI) (total score: 18-126). The Revised Care Evaluation Scale-short version (CES2) was used to assess EOL care (total score: 10-60). We examined the Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) (total score: 0-10) and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ9) (total score: 0-27).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 670 participants were analyzed, including 83 (12.4%) bereaved families of patients with coexisting cancer and dementia. No statistical differences were observed in the total GDI score for 18 items (dementia comorbidity vs. nondementia comorbidity groups, mean ± standard deviation, respectively, 78.4 ± 17.7 vs. 80.0 ± 15.5, adjusted [adj] <i>P</i> = 0.186), CES2 score (49.70 ± 9.22 vs. 48.82 ± 8.40, adj <i>P</i> = 0.316), BGQ score (3.40 ± 2.41 vs. 4.36 ± 2.28, adj <i>P</i> = 0.060), and PHQ9 score (4.67 ± 4.71 vs. 5.50 ± 5.37, adj <i>P</i> = 0.788).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GDI, CES2, BGQ, and PHQ9 scores did not differ significantly between groups, regardless of the presence of dementia in hospice and palliative care units. Patients with coexisting cancer and dementia can achieve a good death by high-quality EOL care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2023.0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with coexisting cancer and dementia often have complex health care needs and face challenges in achieving a good death.

Objectives: To evaluate good death achievement and end-of-life (EOL) care in patients with coexisting cancer and dementia from the perspective of bereaved families.

Design: Cross-sectional nationwide postal survey.

Setting/subjects: Bereaved families of patients with cancer who died in hospice and palliative care units across Japan.

Measurements: Bereaved families completed an anonymous, self-reported questionnaire. Their perspective on achieving a good death was assessed using the Good Death Inventory (GDI) (total score: 18-126). The Revised Care Evaluation Scale-short version (CES2) was used to assess EOL care (total score: 10-60). We examined the Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) (total score: 0-10) and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ9) (total score: 0-27).

Results: Data from 670 participants were analyzed, including 83 (12.4%) bereaved families of patients with coexisting cancer and dementia. No statistical differences were observed in the total GDI score for 18 items (dementia comorbidity vs. nondementia comorbidity groups, mean ± standard deviation, respectively, 78.4 ± 17.7 vs. 80.0 ± 15.5, adjusted [adj] P = 0.186), CES2 score (49.70 ± 9.22 vs. 48.82 ± 8.40, adj P = 0.316), BGQ score (3.40 ± 2.41 vs. 4.36 ± 2.28, adj P = 0.060), and PHQ9 score (4.67 ± 4.71 vs. 5.50 ± 5.37, adj P = 0.788).

Conclusions: GDI, CES2, BGQ, and PHQ9 scores did not differ significantly between groups, regardless of the presence of dementia in hospice and palliative care units. Patients with coexisting cancer and dementia can achieve a good death by high-quality EOL care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并发癌症和痴呆症患者的善终和临终关怀质量:丧亲家庭的视角。
背景同时患有癌症和痴呆症的患者通常具有复杂的医疗需求,在实现良好死亡方面面临挑战:从遗属的角度评估并存癌症和痴呆症患者的善终成就和临终关怀:设计:横断面全国邮寄调查:背景/受试者:在日本各地临终关怀和姑息治疗病房死亡的癌症患者的遗属:遗属填写一份匿名的自我报告问卷。使用 "美好死亡量表"(Good Death Inventory,GDI)(总分:18-126)评估他们对实现美好死亡的看法。修订版护理评估量表-简版(CES2)用于评估临终护理(总分:10-60)。我们研究了简短悲伤问卷(BGQ)(总分:0-10)和患者健康问卷 9(PHQ9)(总分:0-27):结果:分析了 670 名参与者的数据,其中包括 83 个(12.4%)癌症和痴呆并存患者的遗属。18 个项目的 GDI 总分无统计学差异(痴呆合并症组与非痴呆合并症组,平均值±标准差分别为 78.4 ± 17.7 vs. 80.0 ± 15.5,调整[adjust] P = 0.5)。5,调整 [adj] P = 0.186)、CES2 评分(49.70 ± 9.22 vs. 48.82 ± 8.40,adj P = 0.316)、BGQ 评分(3.40 ± 2.41 vs. 4.36 ± 2.28,adj P = 0.060)和 PHQ9 评分(4.67 ± 4.71 vs. 5.50 ± 5.37,adj P = 0.788):结论:无论安宁疗护和姑息治疗病房中是否存在痴呆症,各组间的GDI、CES2、BGQ和PHQ9评分均无显著差异。同时患有癌症和痴呆症的患者可以通过高质量的临终关怀获得善终。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics, Outcomes and Factors for Place of Death in Patients Admitted to Community-Based Palliative Care Services in Shanghai China: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Nursing Practices for Dyspnea Management in Patients with Cancer Based on Monthly and Weekly Prognoses: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional Study of Palliative Care Nurses in Japan. Is a Combination of Six Clinical Tests Useful as a Measure to Predict Short-Term Prognosis in Terminal Cancer Patients? A Prospective Observational Study in a Japanese Palliative Care Unit. The Surprise Question: Not Ready for Prime Time. Use of Nursing Support Among Nurses for Caregiver Burden in Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer in Palliative Care Units in Japan: Multisite Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1