ChatGPT's Role in Gerontology Research.

Christopher N Kaufmann, Chen Bai, Brianne Borgia, Christiaan Leeuwenburgh, Yi Lin, Mamoun T Mardini, Taylor McElroy, Clayton W Swanson, Keon D Wimberly, Ruben Zapata, Rola S Zeidan, Todd M Manini
{"title":"ChatGPT's Role in Gerontology Research.","authors":"Christopher N Kaufmann, Chen Bai, Brianne Borgia, Christiaan Leeuwenburgh, Yi Lin, Mamoun T Mardini, Taylor McElroy, Clayton W Swanson, Keon D Wimberly, Ruben Zapata, Rola S Zeidan, Todd M Manini","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) and other ChatBots have emerged as tools for interacting with information in manners resembling natural human speech. Consequently, the technology is used across various disciplines, including business, education, and even in biomedical sciences. There is a need to better understand how ChatGPT can be used to advance gerontology research. Therefore, we evaluated ChatGPT responses to questions on specific topics in gerontology research, and brainstormed recommendations for its use in the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semistructured brainstorming sessions to identify uses of ChatGPT in gerontology research. We divided a team of multidisciplinary researchers into 4 topical groups: (a) gero-clinical science, (b) basic geroscience, (c) informatics as it relates to electronic health records, and (d) gero-technology. Each group prompted ChatGPT on a theory-, methods-, and interpretation-based question and rated responses for accuracy and completeness based on standardized scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT responses were rated by all groups as generally accurate. However, the completeness of responses was rated lower, except by members of the informatics group, who rated responses as highly comprehensive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT accurately depicts some major concepts in gerontological research. However, researchers have an important role in critically appraising the completeness of its responses. Having a single generalized resource like ChatGPT may help summarize the preponderance of evidence in the field to identify gaps in knowledge and promote cross-disciplinary collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":94243,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) and other ChatBots have emerged as tools for interacting with information in manners resembling natural human speech. Consequently, the technology is used across various disciplines, including business, education, and even in biomedical sciences. There is a need to better understand how ChatGPT can be used to advance gerontology research. Therefore, we evaluated ChatGPT responses to questions on specific topics in gerontology research, and brainstormed recommendations for its use in the field.

Methods: We conducted semistructured brainstorming sessions to identify uses of ChatGPT in gerontology research. We divided a team of multidisciplinary researchers into 4 topical groups: (a) gero-clinical science, (b) basic geroscience, (c) informatics as it relates to electronic health records, and (d) gero-technology. Each group prompted ChatGPT on a theory-, methods-, and interpretation-based question and rated responses for accuracy and completeness based on standardized scales.

Results: ChatGPT responses were rated by all groups as generally accurate. However, the completeness of responses was rated lower, except by members of the informatics group, who rated responses as highly comprehensive.

Conclusions: ChatGPT accurately depicts some major concepts in gerontological research. However, researchers have an important role in critically appraising the completeness of its responses. Having a single generalized resource like ChatGPT may help summarize the preponderance of evidence in the field to identify gaps in knowledge and promote cross-disciplinary collaboration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT 在老年学研究中的作用。
背景介绍ChatGPT 和其他聊天机器人已成为以类似人类自然语言的方式与信息交互的工具。因此,这项技术被广泛应用于各个学科,包括商业、教育,甚至生物医学。我们需要更好地了解如何利用 ChatGPT 推动老年学研究。因此,我们评估了 ChatGPT 对老年学研究中特定主题问题的回答,并集思广益为其在该领域的应用提出了建议:我们举行了半结构化的头脑风暴会议,以确定 ChatGPT 在老年学研究中的用途。我们将一个多学科研究人员团队分为四个专题小组:a) 老年临床科学;b) 基础老年科学;c) 与电子健康记录 (EHR) 相关的信息学;d) 老年技术。每个小组就一个基于理论、方法和解释的问题对 ChatGPT 进行提示,并根据标准化量表对回答的准确性和完整性进行评分:结果:所有小组都认为 ChatGPT 回答基本准确。然而,除信息学小组成员将回答评为高度全面外,其他小组成员对回答的完整性评分较低:ChatGPT 准确地描述了老年学研究中的一些主要概念。结论:ChatGPT 准确地描述了老年学研究中的一些主要概念,但研究人员在严格评估其回答的完整性方面起着重要作用。拥有像 ChatGPT 这样的单一通用资源可能有助于总结该领域的主要证据,从而找出知识差距并促进跨学科合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disentangling Anemia in Frailty: Exploring the Role of Inflammation. Inflammatory Indices and Their Associations with Postoperative Delirium. Metabolic signature of insulin resistance and risk of Alzheimer's disease. Higher-order disease interactions in multimorbidity measurement: marginal benefit over additive disease summation. Sex Differences in the Association Between 24-hour Rest-Activity Rhythms and Frailty Among U.S. Older Adults: Findings from NHANES 2011-2014.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1