Splenic abscesses in the new millenium – a systematic review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY ANZ Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1111/ans.19178
Daniel Quan Hui Ooi, Joshua Quan Chen Ooi, London Lucien Peng Jin Ooi MBBS, MD
{"title":"Splenic abscesses in the new millenium – a systematic review","authors":"Daniel Quan Hui Ooi,&nbsp;Joshua Quan Chen Ooi,&nbsp;London Lucien Peng Jin Ooi MBBS, MD","doi":"10.1111/ans.19178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Isolated splenic abscesses are rare, but increasingly reported with newer organisms and changes in mechanisms involved. We conducted a comparative review of publications from 1900–1977, 1977–1986, 1987–1995, and 1996–2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search in Embase and PubMed resulted in 522 publications (1111 cases). Data was tabulated, analysed, and compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patient demographics and symptoms remain unchanged although more Asian patients were reported. Metastatic infections remain the main cause, but COVID-19-linked and iatrogenic causes post bariatric surgery and splenic artery embolization are increasingly reported. Aerobic organisms remain the commonest (68%), with a variety of exotic organisms reported. Splenectomy remains the definitive treatment, although antibiotics only and percutaneous aspiration/catheter-drainage are increasingly used with reasonable outcomes, with salvage splenectomy for therapeutic failures not having significantly higher mortality than upfront splenectomy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Isolated splenic abscesses continue to be uncommon, with diagnosis requiring a high degree of suspicion. Non-surgical options for treatment can sometimes be definitive.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":"94 10","pages":"1702-1709"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.19178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Isolated splenic abscesses are rare, but increasingly reported with newer organisms and changes in mechanisms involved. We conducted a comparative review of publications from 1900–1977, 1977–1986, 1987–1995, and 1996–2022.

Methods

A systematic search in Embase and PubMed resulted in 522 publications (1111 cases). Data was tabulated, analysed, and compared.

Results

Patient demographics and symptoms remain unchanged although more Asian patients were reported. Metastatic infections remain the main cause, but COVID-19-linked and iatrogenic causes post bariatric surgery and splenic artery embolization are increasingly reported. Aerobic organisms remain the commonest (68%), with a variety of exotic organisms reported. Splenectomy remains the definitive treatment, although antibiotics only and percutaneous aspiration/catheter-drainage are increasingly used with reasonable outcomes, with salvage splenectomy for therapeutic failures not having significantly higher mortality than upfront splenectomy.

Conclusions

Isolated splenic abscesses continue to be uncommon, with diagnosis requiring a high degree of suspicion. Non-surgical options for treatment can sometimes be definitive.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新千年的脾脓肿--系统回顾。
背景:孤立性脾脓肿非常罕见,但随着新生物的出现和相关机制的改变,其报道也越来越多。我们对 1900-1977 年、1977-1986 年、1987-1995 年和 1996-2022 年发表的文章进行了比较研究:方法:我们在 Embase 和 PubMed 上进行了系统检索,共检索到 522 篇文献(1111 个病例)。对数据进行了制表、分析和比较:结果:尽管有更多亚洲患者的报道,但患者的人口统计学和症状保持不变。转移性感染仍是主要病因,但与 COVID-19 相关的病因以及减肥手术后和脾动脉栓塞后的先天性病因也有越来越多的报道。需氧菌仍是最常见的病原体(68%),也有报告称存在多种外来病原体。脾切除术仍是最有效的治疗方法,不过,仅使用抗生素和经皮穿刺抽吸/导管引流术的应用越来越多,且疗效合理,因治疗失败而进行的挽救性脾切除术的死亡率并不明显高于前期脾切除术:孤立性脾脓肿仍不常见,诊断时需要高度怀疑。结论:孤立性脾脓肿仍然不常见,诊断时需要高度怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
The Value of Mannheim Peritonitis Index Combined With ASA Classification in Predicting Postoperative Mortality of Patients With Digestive Tract Perforation. Incidental Palmaris Profundus: An Aberrant Structure Encountered During Routine Carpal Tunnel Release. Grip Strength in New Zealand Adults: Normative Values. Postoperative Sleep Interventions and Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Robot-Assisted Emergency Colorectal Surgery in Australia: The Time Is Now.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1