Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide in older patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective observational study (the OTARU-SEMA study).

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM BMC Endocrine Disorders Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1186/s12902-024-01658-6
Yuki Oe, Hiroshi Nomoto, Kyu Yong Cho, Kei Yokozeki, Tsubasa Ono, Aika Miya, Hiraku Kameda, Akinobu Nakamura, Yoshiaki Arimura, Tatsuya Atsumi
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide in older patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective observational study (the OTARU-SEMA study).","authors":"Yuki Oe, Hiroshi Nomoto, Kyu Yong Cho, Kei Yokozeki, Tsubasa Ono, Aika Miya, Hiraku Kameda, Akinobu Nakamura, Yoshiaki Arimura, Tatsuya Atsumi","doi":"10.1186/s12902-024-01658-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral semaglutide in older subjects with type 2 diabetes was as effective as in younger subjects, according to phase 3 clinical trials. However, its efficacy can be limited in very aged population, due to the presence of impaired cognitive function and the complex instructions for its use. Here, we investigated its efficacy and safety by further age bracket in older subjects in real-world.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied subjects > 65 years of age with type 2 diabetes who started oral semaglutide treatment. The primary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) over 6 months. Adverse events and cognitive function were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and the Hasegawa Dementia Rating Scale-revised (HDS-R). The achievement rate of glycemic targets was evaluated based on the age, health status of subjects and their use of anti-diabetic agents which can cause hypoglycemia, with additional analysis between two subgroups; early (65-74) versus late (≥ 75) older. Furthermore, we evaluated the relationships between their improvements in HbA1c and the baseline characteristics of the subjects, including their cognitive function and insulin secretory capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied the efficacy of the drug in 24 subjects. Their HbA1c and body weight significantly decreased (- 13.1 ± 7.5 mmol/mol and - 3.0 ± 2.4 kg, respectively; P < 0.01). Although cognitive function was lower in the late older group (r = -0.57, P < 0.01), changes in HbA1c showed no difference between the two subgroups (P = 0.66) and it correlated with the insulin secretory capacity rather than cognitive function (r = -0.49, P < 0.05). Glycemic targets were more likely to be achieved (P < 0.01), but HbA1c excessively decreased in late older subjects who were also using insulin or an insulin secretagogue. The frequency of adverse events was similar to that in the clinical trial, whereas discontinuation of medication were more frequent among the late older subjects (Early; n = 2, Late; n = 4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral semaglutide improves the glycemic control of older subjects, but it might be a risk for potential hypoglycemia and discontinuation because of adverse events in subjects of ≥ 75 years. Attention should be paid to insulin secretory capacity and concomitant medications rather than concern about adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01658-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral semaglutide in older subjects with type 2 diabetes was as effective as in younger subjects, according to phase 3 clinical trials. However, its efficacy can be limited in very aged population, due to the presence of impaired cognitive function and the complex instructions for its use. Here, we investigated its efficacy and safety by further age bracket in older subjects in real-world.

Methods: We retrospectively studied subjects > 65 years of age with type 2 diabetes who started oral semaglutide treatment. The primary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) over 6 months. Adverse events and cognitive function were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and the Hasegawa Dementia Rating Scale-revised (HDS-R). The achievement rate of glycemic targets was evaluated based on the age, health status of subjects and their use of anti-diabetic agents which can cause hypoglycemia, with additional analysis between two subgroups; early (65-74) versus late (≥ 75) older. Furthermore, we evaluated the relationships between their improvements in HbA1c and the baseline characteristics of the subjects, including their cognitive function and insulin secretory capacity.

Results: We studied the efficacy of the drug in 24 subjects. Their HbA1c and body weight significantly decreased (- 13.1 ± 7.5 mmol/mol and - 3.0 ± 2.4 kg, respectively; P < 0.01). Although cognitive function was lower in the late older group (r = -0.57, P < 0.01), changes in HbA1c showed no difference between the two subgroups (P = 0.66) and it correlated with the insulin secretory capacity rather than cognitive function (r = -0.49, P < 0.05). Glycemic targets were more likely to be achieved (P < 0.01), but HbA1c excessively decreased in late older subjects who were also using insulin or an insulin secretagogue. The frequency of adverse events was similar to that in the clinical trial, whereas discontinuation of medication were more frequent among the late older subjects (Early; n = 2, Late; n = 4).

Conclusions: Oral semaglutide improves the glycemic control of older subjects, but it might be a risk for potential hypoglycemia and discontinuation because of adverse events in subjects of ≥ 75 years. Attention should be paid to insulin secretory capacity and concomitant medications rather than concern about adherence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服塞马鲁肽对老年 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性观察研究(OTARU-SEMA 研究)。
背景:根据三期临床试验,口服塞马鲁肽对老年 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效与年轻患者相同。然而,由于认知功能受损和复杂的使用说明,它在高龄人群中的疗效可能有限。在此,我们按年龄段进一步调查了该药物在现实世界中对老年受试者的疗效和安全性:我们对年龄大于 65 岁、开始口服塞马鲁肽治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者进行了回顾性研究。主要结果是6个月内糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化。不良事件和认知功能采用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)和长谷川痴呆评定量表修订版(HDS-R)进行评估。根据受试者的年龄、健康状况及其使用可导致低血糖的抗糖尿病药物的情况,对血糖目标的实现率进行了评估,并对两个亚组(早期(65-74 岁)与晚期(≥ 75 岁))进行了额外分析。此外,我们还评估了 HbA1c 改善情况与受试者基线特征(包括认知功能和胰岛素分泌能力)之间的关系:我们对 24 名受试者的药效进行了研究。结果:我们对 24 名受试者的疗效进行了研究,他们的 HbA1c 和体重明显降低(分别为 - 13.1 ± 7.5 mmol/mol 和 - 3.0 ± 2.4 kg;P 结论:口服塞马鲁肽可改善受试者的认知功能和胰岛素分泌能力:口服semaglutide可改善老年患者的血糖控制,但对于年龄≥75岁的患者来说,可能存在潜在的低血糖风险和因不良反应而停药的风险。应关注胰岛素分泌能力和伴随药物,而不是关注依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes screening among women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a descriptive study of commercial claims, 2011–2019 Unravelling a hidden pathology of a vertebral fracture in a teenage girl Exploring the unique association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and vitamin D deficiency in adults aged 20–59: findings based on the NHANES database Relationship between four visceral obesity indices and prediabetes and diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Dalian, China Prevalence, patterns, and determinants of vascular complications of type 2 diabetes in a teaching hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1