{"title":"Prolonged COVID-19 related effects on early language development: A longitudinal study","authors":"Jovana Pejovic, Cátia Severino, Marina Vigário, Sónia Frota","doi":"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is growing evidence that COVID-19 brought changes that immediately affected early language development. Little is known for how long these COVID-19 related changes shaped development. The current study systematically and longitudinally addressed this issue, following up children's language development throughout the first 2.5 years.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The present study follows up on the sample from Frota et al. (2022), which demonstrated that 7–9-month-old infants born and raised during the pandemic do not segment words unlike pre-pandemic peers. Four studies were conducted: (1) word segmentation task at 12 months of age (N<sub>pandemic</sub> = 15); (2) word learning task at 20 months of age (N<sub>pandemic</sub> = 20); (3) language and communication development up to 30 months of age, via CDI and CSBS parental reports (N<sub>pandemic</sub> ranged 25–74); (4) overall development at 30 months of age using the Griffiths Developmental Scales (N<sub>pandemic</sub> = 16).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The pandemic sample consistently underperformed in all four studies in comparison to pre-pandemic data. There was no evidence of developed word segmentation abilities at 12 months of age, and no successful word learning at 20 months of age. Lexical development between 12 and 24 months of age was lower than in the pre-pandemic sample, while social communication did not seem to be affected. At 30 months of age, the pandemic sample showed lower scores and lower mental age on the Language and Communication Griffiths' subscale, in comparison to the pre-pandemic data.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Infants born and raised during the pandemic have a poorer language development, that persists at least until 30 months of age.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11435,"journal":{"name":"Early human development","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 106081"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001506/pdfft?md5=380499cb3d967e9e89d651eda870e356&pid=1-s2.0-S0378378224001506-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early human development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001506","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
There is growing evidence that COVID-19 brought changes that immediately affected early language development. Little is known for how long these COVID-19 related changes shaped development. The current study systematically and longitudinally addressed this issue, following up children's language development throughout the first 2.5 years.
Method
The present study follows up on the sample from Frota et al. (2022), which demonstrated that 7–9-month-old infants born and raised during the pandemic do not segment words unlike pre-pandemic peers. Four studies were conducted: (1) word segmentation task at 12 months of age (Npandemic = 15); (2) word learning task at 20 months of age (Npandemic = 20); (3) language and communication development up to 30 months of age, via CDI and CSBS parental reports (Npandemic ranged 25–74); (4) overall development at 30 months of age using the Griffiths Developmental Scales (Npandemic = 16).
Results
The pandemic sample consistently underperformed in all four studies in comparison to pre-pandemic data. There was no evidence of developed word segmentation abilities at 12 months of age, and no successful word learning at 20 months of age. Lexical development between 12 and 24 months of age was lower than in the pre-pandemic sample, while social communication did not seem to be affected. At 30 months of age, the pandemic sample showed lower scores and lower mental age on the Language and Communication Griffiths' subscale, in comparison to the pre-pandemic data.
Conclusions
Infants born and raised during the pandemic have a poorer language development, that persists at least until 30 months of age.
期刊介绍:
Established as an authoritative, highly cited voice on early human development, Early Human Development provides a unique opportunity for researchers and clinicians to bridge the communication gap between disciplines. Creating a forum for the productive exchange of ideas concerning early human growth and development, the journal publishes original research and clinical papers with particular emphasis on the continuum between fetal life and the perinatal period; aspects of postnatal growth influenced by early events; and the safeguarding of the quality of human survival.
The first comprehensive and interdisciplinary journal in this area of growing importance, Early Human Development offers pertinent contributions to the following subject areas:
Fetology; perinatology; pediatrics; growth and development; obstetrics; reproduction and fertility; epidemiology; behavioural sciences; nutrition and metabolism; teratology; neurology; brain biology; developmental psychology and screening.