A systematic review comparing the efficacy of 980 nm vs. 1470 nm wavelengths in laser hemorrhoidoplasty.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s00384-024-04690-z
Zhicheng Li, Jiong Wu, Nana Kwame Domme Brown, Philemon Kwame Kumassah, Kwabena Agbedinu, Peter C Ambe
{"title":"A systematic review comparing the efficacy of 980 nm vs. 1470 nm wavelengths in laser hemorrhoidoplasty.","authors":"Zhicheng Li, Jiong Wu, Nana Kwame Domme Brown, Philemon Kwame Kumassah, Kwabena Agbedinu, Peter C Ambe","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04690-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a minimally invasive surgical option for the management of hemorrhoidal disease that has been increasingly adopted by surgeons over the last decade. Two wavelengths; 980 nm and 1470 nm have been employed in LHP. However, no data exist comparing the effects of these two wavelengths for this indication. This systematic review investigates both wavelengths for the management of hemorrhoids via the LHP procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic analysis and meta-analysis was performed following the PICOS and PRISMA guidelines. A systematic research of MEDLINE, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases from inception until March 2024 was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 19 studies including seven randomized control trials (RCT) and 12 non-randomized control trials with a total of 2492 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The duration of LHP with both wavelengths was significantly shorter compared to open hemorrhoidectomy, postoperative pain and the rate of postoperative complications were significantly lower following LHP. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of recurrence between LHP with the 980-nm wavelength and open hemorrhoidectomy. However, LHP with 1470-nm wavelength resulted in significantly higher recurrence rate compared to hemorrhoidectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although no direct studies have compared the two wavelengths used in LHP, the outcomes of LHP seem to be independent of the wavelength used. Both wavelengths, when correctly used provide similar results, which are mostly better compared to open hemorrhoidectomy in terms of postoperative complications and postoperative pain, but not in terms of recurrence, where at least for the 1470-nm wavelength, LHP seems to show a higher recurrence rate when compared to open hemorrhoidectomy. Although a direct comparison of both wavelengths was not possible, technical issues regarding number of shots and energy per pile represent relevant parameters for recurrence after LHP.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"39 1","pages":"117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11269455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04690-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a minimally invasive surgical option for the management of hemorrhoidal disease that has been increasingly adopted by surgeons over the last decade. Two wavelengths; 980 nm and 1470 nm have been employed in LHP. However, no data exist comparing the effects of these two wavelengths for this indication. This systematic review investigates both wavelengths for the management of hemorrhoids via the LHP procedure.

Methods: This systematic analysis and meta-analysis was performed following the PICOS and PRISMA guidelines. A systematic research of MEDLINE, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases from inception until March 2024 was performed.

Results: Overall, 19 studies including seven randomized control trials (RCT) and 12 non-randomized control trials with a total of 2492 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The duration of LHP with both wavelengths was significantly shorter compared to open hemorrhoidectomy, postoperative pain and the rate of postoperative complications were significantly lower following LHP. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of recurrence between LHP with the 980-nm wavelength and open hemorrhoidectomy. However, LHP with 1470-nm wavelength resulted in significantly higher recurrence rate compared to hemorrhoidectomy.

Conclusion: Although no direct studies have compared the two wavelengths used in LHP, the outcomes of LHP seem to be independent of the wavelength used. Both wavelengths, when correctly used provide similar results, which are mostly better compared to open hemorrhoidectomy in terms of postoperative complications and postoperative pain, but not in terms of recurrence, where at least for the 1470-nm wavelength, LHP seems to show a higher recurrence rate when compared to open hemorrhoidectomy. Although a direct comparison of both wavelengths was not possible, technical issues regarding number of shots and energy per pile represent relevant parameters for recurrence after LHP.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较 980 纳米与 1470 纳米波长激光痔疮整形术疗效的系统性综述。
背景:激光痔疮成形术(LHP)是一种治疗痔疮疾病的微创手术,在过去十年中越来越多地被外科医生采用。LHP 采用了两种波长:980 纳米和 1470 纳米。然而,目前还没有数据可以比较这两种波长对这一适应症的效果。本系统性综述研究了这两种波长通过 LHP 手术治疗痔疮的效果:本系统分析和荟萃分析遵循 PICOS 和 PRISMA 指南进行。对 MEDLINE、Scopus、Clinicaltrials.gov、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、CENTRAL 和 Google Scholar 数据库从开始到 2024 年 3 月的数据进行了系统研究:本系统综述和荟萃分析共纳入19项研究,包括7项随机对照试验(RCT)和12项非随机对照试验,共有2492名患者参与。与开放性痔切除术相比,两种波长的LHP手术持续时间明显缩短,术后疼痛和术后并发症发生率明显降低。使用 980 纳米波长的 LHP 与开放式痔疮切除术在复发率上没有明显的统计学差异。然而,与痔切除术相比,使用1470纳米波长的LHP导致的复发率明显更高:结论:虽然没有直接研究比较过 LHP 使用的两种波长,但 LHP 的结果似乎与使用的波长无关。这两种波长如果使用得当,效果相似,在术后并发症和术后疼痛方面大多优于开放式痔疮切除术,但在复发率方面却不尽相同,至少在 1470-nm 波长方面,LHP 与开放式痔疮切除术相比似乎显示出更高的复发率。虽然无法对两种波长进行直接比较,但有关每根痔核的注射次数和能量的技术问题代表了 LHP 术后复发的相关参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a preoperative systemic inflammation-based nomogram for predicting surgical site infection in patients with colorectal cancer. AQP3 mediates autophagy through SIRT1/p62 signal to alleviate intestinal epithelial cell damage caused by sepsis. Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios pre- and post-surgery in stage III CRC: a study of 2,742 patients. Development of a novel nomogram for the prediction of surgical site infection risk after loop ileostomy closure. Circulating tumor DNA as a predictive biomarker for treatment response and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1