Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes Ribeiro RN, PhD in Nursing Sciences, Letícia de Lima Trindade RN, PhD in Nursing, Carla Gomes da Rocha RN, Master's degree in Nursing Sciences, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral Teles PhD in Statistics, Mariana Mendes RN, Master's degree in Nursing, Marlene Patrícia Ribeiro RN, Master's Degree in Rehabilitation Nursing, Soraia Cristina de Abreu Pereira RN, Master's Degree in Medical-Surgical Nursing, Ana da Conceição Alves Faria RN, Master's Degree in Rehabilitation Nursing, João Miguel Almeida Ventura da Silva RN, Master's Degree in Nursing Sciences, Clemente Neves de Sousa RN, PhD in Nursing Sciences
{"title":"Scale for the environments evaluation of professional nursing practice—shortened version: Psychometric evaluation","authors":"Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes Ribeiro RN, PhD in Nursing Sciences, Letícia de Lima Trindade RN, PhD in Nursing, Carla Gomes da Rocha RN, Master's degree in Nursing Sciences, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral Teles PhD in Statistics, Mariana Mendes RN, Master's degree in Nursing, Marlene Patrícia Ribeiro RN, Master's Degree in Rehabilitation Nursing, Soraia Cristina de Abreu Pereira RN, Master's Degree in Medical-Surgical Nursing, Ana da Conceição Alves Faria RN, Master's Degree in Rehabilitation Nursing, João Miguel Almeida Ventura da Silva RN, Master's Degree in Nursing Sciences, Clemente Neves de Sousa RN, PhD in Nursing Sciences","doi":"10.1111/ijn.13291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the shortened version of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE-Nursing Practice).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This methodological, cross-sectional study was conducted between September and December 2022. The original version of the SEE-Nursing Practice was administered in questionnaire format across 17 hospitals. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to identify relevant items for the new shortened version of the scale and evaluate its construct validity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study involved 1713 registered nurses from various regions of Portugal. From the exploratory factor analysis, the SEE-Nursing Practice was condensed to 59 items and 3 subscales. In the structure subscale, 14 items were removed, and the remaining 29 items distributed over four factors; in the process subscale, 18 items were removed, and the remaining 19 items organized into three factors; in the outcome subscale, 2 items were removed, and the remaining 11 items distributed over two factors. The Cronbach's alpha for the three subscales exceeded 0.90, indicating high reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the validity of the 59-item model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The shortened version of the SEE-Nursing Practice shows adequate validity and reliability, reducing the burden associated with its longer version.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.13291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the shortened version of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE-Nursing Practice).
Methods
This methodological, cross-sectional study was conducted between September and December 2022. The original version of the SEE-Nursing Practice was administered in questionnaire format across 17 hospitals. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to identify relevant items for the new shortened version of the scale and evaluate its construct validity.
Results
The study involved 1713 registered nurses from various regions of Portugal. From the exploratory factor analysis, the SEE-Nursing Practice was condensed to 59 items and 3 subscales. In the structure subscale, 14 items were removed, and the remaining 29 items distributed over four factors; in the process subscale, 18 items were removed, and the remaining 19 items organized into three factors; in the outcome subscale, 2 items were removed, and the remaining 11 items distributed over two factors. The Cronbach's alpha for the three subscales exceeded 0.90, indicating high reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the validity of the 59-item model.
Conclusion
The shortened version of the SEE-Nursing Practice shows adequate validity and reliability, reducing the burden associated with its longer version.
期刊介绍：
International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
