Neonatal outcomes of planned vaginal delivery versus planned cesarean section for breech presentation at term: Population-based study on 546,842 breech births across the United States between 2008 and 2017

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102827
Magdalena Peeva , Nicholas Czuzoj-Shulman , Haim Arie Abenhaim
{"title":"Neonatal outcomes of planned vaginal delivery versus planned cesarean section for breech presentation at term: Population-based study on 546,842 breech births across the United States between 2008 and 2017","authors":"Magdalena Peeva ,&nbsp;Nicholas Czuzoj-Shulman ,&nbsp;Haim Arie Abenhaim","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Over the last several decades, cesarean delivery has been recommended as the safest mode of delivery for breech presentations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of planned vaginal births with planned cesarean births in breech presenting fetuses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective population-based cohort study utilized data from the United States’ Period Linked Birth-Infant Death Public Use Files from 2008 to 2017. All term singleton breech deliveries of a live baby without congenital anomalies were identified (<em>n</em> = 546,842) and divided into two cohorts: women who had a planned vaginal birth (<em>n</em> = 116,828), and women who had a planned cesarean section (<em>n</em> = 430,014). Multivariate logistic regression models, adjusted for maternal baseline characteristics, examined the associations between the planned delivery method and neonatal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>It was observed that 26.14 % of the planned vaginal birth cohort had a vaginal delivery. In adjusted analyses, undergoing a planned vaginal birth for breech delivery was associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes including infant death, OR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.16–1.52, admission to NICU,1.23, 1.19–1.27, ventilation support at 〈 6 h of life, 1.47, 1.42–1.52, ventilation support at 〉 6 h of life, 1.19, 1.08–1.31, and Apgar score of ≤3 at 5 min, 2.27, 2.06–2.50.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In women carrying fetuses in breech presentation, having a planned vaginal birth had a low success rate and was associated with increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Women should be carefully counselled on the risks associated with breech vaginal delivery as well as the low success rate of vaginal delivery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 10","pages":"Article 102827"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724001065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Over the last several decades, cesarean delivery has been recommended as the safest mode of delivery for breech presentations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of planned vaginal births with planned cesarean births in breech presenting fetuses.

Methods

This retrospective population-based cohort study utilized data from the United States’ Period Linked Birth-Infant Death Public Use Files from 2008 to 2017. All term singleton breech deliveries of a live baby without congenital anomalies were identified (n = 546,842) and divided into two cohorts: women who had a planned vaginal birth (n = 116,828), and women who had a planned cesarean section (n = 430,014). Multivariate logistic regression models, adjusted for maternal baseline characteristics, examined the associations between the planned delivery method and neonatal outcomes.

Results

It was observed that 26.14 % of the planned vaginal birth cohort had a vaginal delivery. In adjusted analyses, undergoing a planned vaginal birth for breech delivery was associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes including infant death, OR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.16–1.52, admission to NICU,1.23, 1.19–1.27, ventilation support at 〈 6 h of life, 1.47, 1.42–1.52, ventilation support at 〉 6 h of life, 1.19, 1.08–1.31, and Apgar score of ≤3 at 5 min, 2.27, 2.06–2.50.

Conclusion

In women carrying fetuses in breech presentation, having a planned vaginal birth had a low success rate and was associated with increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Women should be carefully counselled on the risks associated with breech vaginal delivery as well as the low success rate of vaginal delivery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
臀位临产时计划阴道分娩与计划剖宫产的新生儿结局:对 2008 年至 2017 年间全美 546 842 例臀位分娩的人群研究。
导言:在过去的几十年中,剖宫产一直被推荐为臀先露最安全的分娩方式。本研究旨在评估臀位胎儿经阴道分娩和剖宫产的结果:这项以人群为基础的回顾性队列研究使用了 2008-2017 年美国出生-婴儿死亡公共使用档案中的数据。研究确定了所有足月单胎臀位分娩且无先天性异常的活产婴儿(n=546,842),并将其分为两个队列:计划阴道分娩的产妇(n=116,828)和计划剖宫产的产妇(n=430,014)。经调整产妇基线特征后,多变量逻辑回归模型检验了计划分娩方式与新生儿预后之间的关系:结果表明:26.14%的计划阴道分娩人群通过阴道分娩。在调整后的分析中,臀位分娩时接受计划阴道分娩与新生儿不良结局的风险增加有关,包括婴儿死亡(OR 1.32,95% CI 1.16-1.52)、入住新生儿重症监护室(NICU)(1.23, 1.19-1.27, 通气支持<6小时, 1.47, 1.42-1.52, 通气支持>6小时, 1.19, 1.08-1.31, 5分钟Apgar评分≤3, 2.27, 2.06-2.50.结论:对臀先露胎儿的妇女来说,经阴道分娩的成功率较低,且与新生儿发病率和死亡率的增加有关。应就臀位阴道分娩的相关风险以及阴道分娩的低成功率对妇女进行仔细咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents New reference charts for fetal ultrasound corpus callosum length with emphasis on the third trimester High-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer: A new approach using cluster analysis of tumor markers Partners experiences of caesarean deliveries in the operating room
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1