Ryosuke Yamaga, Masato Chikaishi, Toshihiro Iwasaki, Akira Tada, Saki Mizutani, Kota Amano, Yoko Iwase, Hiroshige Taniguchi
{"title":"Pilot study on the relationship between oral function or subjective symptoms and appetite","authors":"Ryosuke Yamaga, Masato Chikaishi, Toshihiro Iwasaki, Akira Tada, Saki Mizutani, Kota Amano, Yoko Iwase, Hiroshige Taniguchi","doi":"10.1111/joor.13811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This pilot study evaluated the relationships between appetite and oral function, and between appetite and the subjective symptoms of decreased oral function.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p><i>Seventy-one</i> adult dental clinic <i>patients</i> (22 males, 66.0 ± 14.0 years) participated in this study. A Council on Nutrition Appetite Questionnaire score of ≤28 indicated anorexia, and the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-form, body mass index and skeletal muscle mass index were used to define subject characteristics. Seven oral function tests and seven subjective symptoms related to oral function were evaluated. The relationship between subject characteristics, oral function tests, subjective symptoms and anorexia was analysed using the chi-square test and univariate and multivariate logistic regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Result</h3>\n \n <p><i>T</i>here were significant differences between the normal appetite group and the anorexia group for the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) survey and the question ‘Food remains in the oral cavity after eating’ (<i>p</i> < .05). Univariate logistic regression found significant differences in the items of masticatory function, the EAT-10 survey and the question ‘Food remains in the oral cavity after eating’. Multivariate logistic regression revealed significant differences in masticatory function (AOR 4.35; 95% CI: 1.03–18.35; <i>p</i> = .045) and EAT-10 (AOR 6.27; 95% CI: 1.40–24.02; <i>p</i> = .016).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p><i>This pilot study investigated</i> the influence of factors related to oral function on appetite. Relationships were found among poor masticatory function, poor swallowing function and anorexia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":"51 11","pages":"2261-2269"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joor.13811","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This pilot study evaluated the relationships between appetite and oral function, and between appetite and the subjective symptoms of decreased oral function.
Methods
Seventy-one adult dental clinic patients (22 males, 66.0 ± 14.0 years) participated in this study. A Council on Nutrition Appetite Questionnaire score of ≤28 indicated anorexia, and the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-form, body mass index and skeletal muscle mass index were used to define subject characteristics. Seven oral function tests and seven subjective symptoms related to oral function were evaluated. The relationship between subject characteristics, oral function tests, subjective symptoms and anorexia was analysed using the chi-square test and univariate and multivariate logistic regression.
Result
There were significant differences between the normal appetite group and the anorexia group for the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) survey and the question ‘Food remains in the oral cavity after eating’ (p < .05). Univariate logistic regression found significant differences in the items of masticatory function, the EAT-10 survey and the question ‘Food remains in the oral cavity after eating’. Multivariate logistic regression revealed significant differences in masticatory function (AOR 4.35; 95% CI: 1.03–18.35; p = .045) and EAT-10 (AOR 6.27; 95% CI: 1.40–24.02; p = .016).
Conclusion
This pilot study investigated the influence of factors related to oral function on appetite. Relationships were found among poor masticatory function, poor swallowing function and anorexia.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.