Efficacy, Confounders and Safety of the Preserflo Microshunt.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1055/a-2325-9286
Cemre Altas, Thomas A Fuchsluger, Tobias Brockmann, Anna Graumüller, Marcus Walckling
{"title":"Efficacy, Confounders and Safety of the Preserflo Microshunt.","authors":"Cemre Altas, Thomas A Fuchsluger, Tobias Brockmann, Anna Graumüller, Marcus Walckling","doi":"10.1055/a-2325-9286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. We evaluated the efficacy, confounders, and safety of the Preserflo Microshunt over a one-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective monocentric study, 111 eyes were evaluated. 83 eyes had primary open angle glaucoma, and 28 eyes secondary open angle glaucoma. Intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, number of glaucoma medications, complications, and reoperations were evaluated postoperatively, at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The influence of age, sex, type of glaucoma, previous surgery and lens status was also analysed. Bleb revision was indicated if corrected IOP exceeded 18 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraocular pressure significantly decreased from 24.50 ± 8.94 to 14.62 ± 4.86 mmHg (4 - 32 mmHg; p < 0.001), the number of medications from 3.19 ± 1.14 to 0.98 ± 1.39 (0 - 4; p < 0.001). Confounders of interest did not affect efficacy. Bleb revision was performed in 22.5% of eyes and a cyclophotocoagulation was performed in 9.9% of eyes. Complete surgical success (IOP ≤ 17 mmHg, IOP reduction ≥ 20%, without medication) was achieved in 36.9% (n = 41) and qualified success (with medication) in 51.4% (n = 57) of eyes. Transient hypotension (≤ 5 mmHg) occurred in 19.8% after primary implantation and in 1.8% after bleb revision (duration ≤ 3 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To date, the Preserflo Microshunt has demonstrated good efficacy and a low risk profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":17904,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2325-9286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. We evaluated the efficacy, confounders, and safety of the Preserflo Microshunt over a one-year follow-up period.

Methods: In this retrospective monocentric study, 111 eyes were evaluated. 83 eyes had primary open angle glaucoma, and 28 eyes secondary open angle glaucoma. Intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, number of glaucoma medications, complications, and reoperations were evaluated postoperatively, at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The influence of age, sex, type of glaucoma, previous surgery and lens status was also analysed. Bleb revision was indicated if corrected IOP exceeded 18 mmHg.

Results: Intraocular pressure significantly decreased from 24.50 ± 8.94 to 14.62 ± 4.86 mmHg (4 - 32 mmHg; p < 0.001), the number of medications from 3.19 ± 1.14 to 0.98 ± 1.39 (0 - 4; p < 0.001). Confounders of interest did not affect efficacy. Bleb revision was performed in 22.5% of eyes and a cyclophotocoagulation was performed in 9.9% of eyes. Complete surgical success (IOP ≤ 17 mmHg, IOP reduction ≥ 20%, without medication) was achieved in 36.9% (n = 41) and qualified success (with medication) in 51.4% (n = 57) of eyes. Transient hypotension (≤ 5 mmHg) occurred in 19.8% after primary implantation and in 1.8% after bleb revision (duration ≤ 3 months).

Conclusion: To date, the Preserflo Microshunt has demonstrated good efficacy and a low risk profile.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preserflo 微分流术的疗效、并发症和安全性
背景:青光眼是全球致盲的主要原因。我们对 Preserflo 微分流术一年随访期的疗效、混杂因素和安全性进行了评估:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们对 111 只眼睛进行了评估。83只眼睛患有原发性开角型青光眼,28只眼睛患有继发性开角型青光眼。术后1、3、6、9和12个月对眼压(IOP)、视力、青光眼用药次数、并发症和再次手术进行了评估。此外,还分析了年龄、性别、青光眼类型、既往手术和晶状体状态的影响。如果矫正后的眼压超过 18 mmHg,则需要进行眼压计修整:结果:眼内压从 24.50 ± 8.94 mmHg 显著下降到 14.62 ± 4.86 mmHg(4 - 32 mmHg;p 结论:Preserfloor 技术是目前最有效的青光眼治疗方法:迄今为止,Preserflo 微分流术已证明疗效好、风险低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: -Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Klinik und Praxis: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung - für Sie auf den Punkt gebracht und kritisch kommentiert, Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis, Top informiert - breite klinische Berichterstattung. -CME-Punkte sammeln mit dem Refresher: Effiziente, CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung, mit dem Refresher, 3 CME-Punkte pro Ausgabe - bis zu 36 CME-Punkte im Jahr!. -Aktuelle Rubriken mit echtem Nutzwert: Kurzreferate zu den wichtigsten Artikeln internationaler Zeitschriften, Schwerpunktthema in jedem Heft: Ausführliche Übersichtsarbeiten zu den wichtigsten Themen der Ophthalmologie – so behalten Sie das gesamte Fach im Blick!, Originalien mit den neuesten Entwicklungen, Übersichten zu den relevanten Themen.
期刊最新文献
An unusual presentation of persistent Cloquet’s canal with detached Mittendorf dot: a case report. Celebrating 25 Years of Optical Biometry: A Milestone in Ophthalmology. Artificial Intelligence in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. [Age-related macular degeneration - Part 1: Pathophysiology, classification and diagnostic]. [Minimally invasive therapy for nasolacrimal duct obstructions].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1