Eric J Chan, Philipp Anders, Simona A Garobbio, Ursula Hall, Chrysoula Gabrani, Kristina Pfau, Hanna Camenzind Zuche, Stefan Futterknecht, Maximilian Pfau, Michael Herzog, Ghislaine L Traber, Hendrik P N Scholl
{"title":"Retinal Sensitivity in Macular Subfields and Their Association with Contrast Sensitivity in Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.","authors":"Eric J Chan, Philipp Anders, Simona A Garobbio, Ursula Hall, Chrysoula Gabrani, Kristina Pfau, Hanna Camenzind Zuche, Stefan Futterknecht, Maximilian Pfau, Michael Herzog, Ghislaine L Traber, Hendrik P N Scholl","doi":"10.1159/000540312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate retinal sensitivity in subfields and its association with the novel quantitative contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) in patients with early age-related macular degeneration (eAMD), in patients with intermediate AMD (iAMD), and in healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective longitudinal study, retinal sensitivity of a customized 24-point grid was assessed by microperimetry Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA, CenterVue, Padova, Italy) and divided into different subfields. The Multiple Contrast Vision Meter (Adaptive Sensory Technology, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for qCSF testing. Linear models were used to test the association of functional metrics with variables of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>92 study eyes from 92 participants were analyzed (13 eAMD, 31 iAMD, and 48 controls). Microperimetry subfield comparison showed significant differences (p < 0.0001) in the control group between superior and inferior hemifield as well as between central and peripheral subfields. For eAMD, significant differences were found between central and peripheral subfields (p < 0.001) and specific subfields (p < 0.05) and finally for iAMD between specific quadrants (p < 0.05) and specific squares (p < 0.05). Significant associations of retinal sensitivity with qCSF metrics were found for the area underneath the logarithmic contrast sensitivity function, contrast acuity and for the contrast sensitivity at specific spatial frequencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed significant differences in the evaluated retinal sensitivity subfields, providing localized natural history data for retinal sensitivity in healthy controls and patients with eAMD and iAMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19662,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Research","volume":" ","pages":"458-469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate retinal sensitivity in subfields and its association with the novel quantitative contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) in patients with early age-related macular degeneration (eAMD), in patients with intermediate AMD (iAMD), and in healthy controls.
Methods: In this prospective longitudinal study, retinal sensitivity of a customized 24-point grid was assessed by microperimetry Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA, CenterVue, Padova, Italy) and divided into different subfields. The Multiple Contrast Vision Meter (Adaptive Sensory Technology, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for qCSF testing. Linear models were used to test the association of functional metrics with variables of interest.
Results: 92 study eyes from 92 participants were analyzed (13 eAMD, 31 iAMD, and 48 controls). Microperimetry subfield comparison showed significant differences (p < 0.0001) in the control group between superior and inferior hemifield as well as between central and peripheral subfields. For eAMD, significant differences were found between central and peripheral subfields (p < 0.001) and specific subfields (p < 0.05) and finally for iAMD between specific quadrants (p < 0.05) and specific squares (p < 0.05). Significant associations of retinal sensitivity with qCSF metrics were found for the area underneath the logarithmic contrast sensitivity function, contrast acuity and for the contrast sensitivity at specific spatial frequencies.
Conclusions: This study showed significant differences in the evaluated retinal sensitivity subfields, providing localized natural history data for retinal sensitivity in healthy controls and patients with eAMD and iAMD.
期刊介绍:
''Ophthalmic Research'' features original papers and reviews reporting on translational and clinical studies. Authors from throughout the world cover research topics on every field in connection with physical, physiologic, pharmacological, biochemical and molecular biological aspects of ophthalmology. This journal also aims to provide a record of international clinical research for both researchers and clinicians in ophthalmology. Finally, the transfer of information from fundamental research to clinical research and clinical practice is particularly welcome.