No evidence of pathogenicity of Dientamoeba fragilis following detection in stools: A case-control study.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY Parasite Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1051/parasite/2024041
Germain Tchamwa Bamini, Eléna Charpentier, Emilie Guemas, Pamela Chauvin, Judith Fillaux, Alexis Valentin, Sophie Cassaing, Sandie Ménard, Antoine Berry, Xavier Iriart
{"title":"No evidence of pathogenicity of Dientamoeba fragilis following detection in stools: A case-control study.","authors":"Germain Tchamwa Bamini, Eléna Charpentier, Emilie Guemas, Pamela Chauvin, Judith Fillaux, Alexis Valentin, Sophie Cassaing, Sandie Ménard, Antoine Berry, Xavier Iriart","doi":"10.1051/parasite/2024041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dientamoeba fragilis is a ubiquitous intestinal parasite with detection in the stools that has become increasingly frequent following the advent of PCR as a routine screening tool. However, the pathogenicity of this parasite is still much debated. In order to assess the potentially pathogenic nature of this protozoan, a retrospective case-control study was carried out between January and December 2020 on patients from Toulouse University Hospital, with the aim of evaluating the potential clinical effects and changes in laboratory parameters linked to the presence and load of D. fragilis in stools. After matching age, sex and mode of care (consultation or hospitalisation), no significant difference was observed in the frequency of clinical signs between the 36 patients who tested positive for Dientamoeba fragilis PCR in their stools and the 72 control patients who were PCR negative for this protozoan. The presence of D. fragilis in the faeces was not associated with changes in laboratory parameters. Furthermore, a high digestive load of D. fragilis had no identifiable impact on clinical and laboratory parameters. Only the concomitant presence of Blastocystis sp. in stools was significantly more frequent in the D. fragilis group (uni- and multivariate analysis). Finally, this study showed no significant difference in clinical or laboratory signs between patients carrying Dientamoeba fragilis and the control group, regardless of the intestinal parasite load, suggesting that D. fragilis could be considered a commensal of the digestive tract.</p>","PeriodicalId":19796,"journal":{"name":"Parasite","volume":"31 ","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2024041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dientamoeba fragilis is a ubiquitous intestinal parasite with detection in the stools that has become increasingly frequent following the advent of PCR as a routine screening tool. However, the pathogenicity of this parasite is still much debated. In order to assess the potentially pathogenic nature of this protozoan, a retrospective case-control study was carried out between January and December 2020 on patients from Toulouse University Hospital, with the aim of evaluating the potential clinical effects and changes in laboratory parameters linked to the presence and load of D. fragilis in stools. After matching age, sex and mode of care (consultation or hospitalisation), no significant difference was observed in the frequency of clinical signs between the 36 patients who tested positive for Dientamoeba fragilis PCR in their stools and the 72 control patients who were PCR negative for this protozoan. The presence of D. fragilis in the faeces was not associated with changes in laboratory parameters. Furthermore, a high digestive load of D. fragilis had no identifiable impact on clinical and laboratory parameters. Only the concomitant presence of Blastocystis sp. in stools was significantly more frequent in the D. fragilis group (uni- and multivariate analysis). Finally, this study showed no significant difference in clinical or laboratory signs between patients carrying Dientamoeba fragilis and the control group, regardless of the intestinal parasite load, suggesting that D. fragilis could be considered a commensal of the digestive tract.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在粪便中检测到脆弱片阿米巴后,没有证据表明其具有致病性:病例对照研究。
脆弱片阿米巴是一种无处不在的肠道寄生虫,随着 PCR 作为常规筛查工具的出现,在粪便中检测到这种寄生虫的频率越来越高。然而,关于这种寄生虫的致病性仍存在很多争议。为了评估这种原生动物的潜在致病性,我们在 2020 年 1 月至 12 月期间对图卢兹大学医院的患者进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,目的是评估与粪便中存在的脆弱拟杆菌及其载量相关的潜在临床影响和实验室参数变化。在对年龄、性别和就诊方式(就诊或住院)进行匹配后,粪便中脆弱片阿米巴原虫PCR检测呈阳性的36名患者与该原虫PCR检测呈阴性的72名对照组患者的临床症状发生率没有明显差异。粪便中是否存在脆弱片阿米巴与实验室参数的变化无关。此外,消化道中大量的脆弱拟杆菌对临床和实验室指标也没有明显的影响。只有同时在粪便中发现布氏囊虫的情况在脆弱拟杆菌组中明显更常见(单变量和多变量分析)。最后,本研究表明,无论肠道寄生虫数量多少,携带脆弱片阿米巴的患者与对照组在临床或实验室体征方面均无明显差异,这表明脆弱片阿米巴可被视为消化道的共生菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parasite
Parasite 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
49
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Parasite is an international open-access, peer-reviewed, online journal publishing high quality papers on all aspects of human and animal parasitology. Reviews, articles and short notes may be submitted. Fields include, but are not limited to: general, medical and veterinary parasitology; morphology, including ultrastructure; parasite systematics, including entomology, acarology, helminthology and protistology, and molecular analyses; molecular biology and biochemistry; immunology of parasitic diseases; host-parasite relationships; ecology and life history of parasites; epidemiology; therapeutics; new diagnostic tools. All papers in Parasite are published in English. Manuscripts should have a broad interest and must not have been published or submitted elsewhere. No limit is imposed on the length of manuscripts, but they should be concisely written. Papers of limited interest such as case reports, epidemiological studies in punctual areas, isolated new geographical records, and systematic descriptions of single species will generally not be accepted, but might be considered if the authors succeed in demonstrating their interest.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of a topical formulation containing eprinomectin, esafoxolaner and praziquantel (NexGard® Combo) in the treatment of natural respiratory capillariosis of cats. Relationship between acaricide resistance and acetylcholinesterase gene polymorphisms in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Chewing lice of Bearded Reedling (Panurus biarmicus) and diversity of louse-host associations of birds in reed beds in Slovakia. Comparative performance of ISAGA IgM and ELISA assays for the diagnosis of maternal and congenital Toxoplasma infections: which technique could replace ISAGA IgM? Galactomannan inhibits Trichinella spiralis invasion of intestinal epithelium cells and enhances antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity related killing of larvae by driving macrophage polarization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1