Inpatient's, therapist's and staff's expectations regarding treatment and their effects on placebo response in the psychiatric ward - results from an add-on oxytocin RCT.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1007/s00213-024-06593-x
Uri Nitzan, A Grossman-Girron, O Sedoff, H Maoz, O Arad, E Tilbor, C Dror, D Tzur Bitan
{"title":"Inpatient's, therapist's and staff's expectations regarding treatment and their effects on placebo response in the psychiatric ward - results from an add-on oxytocin RCT.","authors":"Uri Nitzan, A Grossman-Girron, O Sedoff, H Maoz, O Arad, E Tilbor, C Dror, D Tzur Bitan","doi":"10.1007/s00213-024-06593-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patient's and therapist's expectations are considered an important factor influencing placebo response in experimental and therapeutic settings. Nevertheless, the placebo effects of common neurological facilitators that promote treatment efficacy have not been explored. In the present study we examined the estimations of patients, therapists, and staff members, regarding their treatment type and assessed their influence on the facilitating effects of oxytocin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (N = 87) were randomized and double-blindly allocated to receive either oxytocin or placebo, twice daily for a period of four weeks, as part of a larger randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patient's, therapist's and staff's expectations were assessed based on their estimation of treatment type (agent or placebo). Multilevel modeling and univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed to assess the effects of patient's, therapist's, and staff's estimations on treatment outcome beyond the effects of treatment type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Staff's, therapist's, and patient's estimations were significantly associated with treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, only therapist's and patient's estimations significantly predicted improvement beyond actual administration, with therapist's and patient's estimations associated with improvement in trait anxiety (STAI-T, B=-1.80, p < .05, and B=-2.02, p < .05, respectively); therapist's estimations were associated with improvement in general distress (OQ-45, B=-3.71, p < .05), and patient's estimations were associated with symptom relief (HSCL-11, B=-0.13, p < .05). Overall, patient's estimations had a higher relative contribution to treatment success, with standardized coefficients across scales ranging from - 0.06 to -0.26.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The neurobiological factors that promote treatment success are also influenced by patient's and therapist's expectations. Future studies should consider these effects when examining their impact in inpatient settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20783,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-024-06593-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patient's and therapist's expectations are considered an important factor influencing placebo response in experimental and therapeutic settings. Nevertheless, the placebo effects of common neurological facilitators that promote treatment efficacy have not been explored. In the present study we examined the estimations of patients, therapists, and staff members, regarding their treatment type and assessed their influence on the facilitating effects of oxytocin.

Methods: Patients (N = 87) were randomized and double-blindly allocated to receive either oxytocin or placebo, twice daily for a period of four weeks, as part of a larger randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patient's, therapist's and staff's expectations were assessed based on their estimation of treatment type (agent or placebo). Multilevel modeling and univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed to assess the effects of patient's, therapist's, and staff's estimations on treatment outcome beyond the effects of treatment type.

Results: Staff's, therapist's, and patient's estimations were significantly associated with treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, only therapist's and patient's estimations significantly predicted improvement beyond actual administration, with therapist's and patient's estimations associated with improvement in trait anxiety (STAI-T, B=-1.80, p < .05, and B=-2.02, p < .05, respectively); therapist's estimations were associated with improvement in general distress (OQ-45, B=-3.71, p < .05), and patient's estimations were associated with symptom relief (HSCL-11, B=-0.13, p < .05). Overall, patient's estimations had a higher relative contribution to treatment success, with standardized coefficients across scales ranging from - 0.06 to -0.26.

Conclusions: The neurobiological factors that promote treatment success are also influenced by patient's and therapist's expectations. Future studies should consider these effects when examining their impact in inpatient settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院病人、治疗师和工作人员对治疗的期望及其对精神科病房安慰剂反应的影响--附加催产素 RCT 的结果。
目的:在实验和治疗环境中,患者和治疗师的期望被认为是影响安慰剂反应的一个重要因素。然而,人们尚未对促进治疗效果的常见神经促进因素的安慰剂效应进行研究。在本研究中,我们考察了患者、治疗师和工作人员对治疗类型的估计,并评估了他们对催产素促进作用的影响:作为一项大型随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的一部分,患者(87 人)被随机、双盲地分配到接受催产素或安慰剂治疗,每天两次,为期四周。根据患者、治疗师和工作人员对治疗类型(催产素或安慰剂)的估计,对他们的期望值进行了评估。我们进行了多层次建模以及单变量和多变量回归分析,以评估患者、治疗师和工作人员的估计对治疗结果的影响,而不是治疗类型的影响:结果:工作人员、治疗师和患者的估计与治疗结果有显著相关性。然而,只有治疗师和患者的估计能显著预测实际治疗效果以外的改善,治疗师和患者的估计与特质焦虑的改善有关(STAI-T,B=-1.80,p 结论:治疗师和患者的估计与特质焦虑的改善有关:促进治疗成功的神经生物学因素也受到患者和治疗师期望的影响。未来的研究在考察这些因素对住院环境的影响时,应考虑到这些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology
Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Behavioural Pharmacology Society (EBPS) Psychopharmacology is an international journal that covers the broad topic of elucidating mechanisms by which drugs affect behavior. The scope of the journal encompasses the following fields: Human Psychopharmacology: Experimental This section includes manuscripts describing the effects of drugs on mood, behavior, cognition and physiology in humans. The journal encourages submissions that involve brain imaging, genetics, neuroendocrinology, and developmental topics. Usually manuscripts in this section describe studies conducted under controlled conditions, but occasionally descriptive or observational studies are also considered. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Translational This section comprises studies addressing the broad intersection of drugs and psychiatric illness. This includes not only clinical trials and studies of drug usage and metabolism, drug surveillance, and pharmacoepidemiology, but also work utilizing the entire range of clinically relevant methodologies, including neuroimaging, pharmacogenetics, cognitive science, biomarkers, and others. Work directed toward the translation of preclinical to clinical knowledge is especially encouraged. The key feature of submissions to this section is that they involve a focus on clinical aspects. Preclinical psychopharmacology: Behavioral and Neural This section considers reports on the effects of compounds with defined chemical structures on any aspect of behavior, in particular when correlated with neurochemical effects, in species other than humans. Manuscripts containing neuroscientific techniques in combination with behavior are welcome. We encourage reports of studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action, at the behavioral and molecular levels. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Translational This section considers manuscripts that enhance the confidence in a central mechanism that could be of therapeutic value for psychiatric or neurological patients, using disease-relevant preclinical models and tests, or that report on preclinical manipulations and challenges that have the potential to be translated to the clinic. Studies aiming at the refinement of preclinical models based upon clinical findings (back-translation) will also be considered. The journal particularly encourages submissions that integrate measures of target tissue exposure, activity on the molecular target and/or modulation of the targeted biochemical pathways. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic This section focuses on the molecular and cellular actions of neuropharmacological agents / drugs, and the identification / validation of drug targets affecting the CNS in health and disease. We particularly encourage studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action at the molecular level. Manuscripts containing evidence for genetic or epigenetic effects on neurochemistry or behavior are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Delineating anticipatory arousal from reward consumption: evaluating fixed-intervals in cocaine seeking-taking response chains. Multimodal examination of daily stress rhythms in chronic Cannabis users. The effects of caffeine mouth rinsing on selective attention as a function of different caffeine concentrations and perceived taste intensity in recreationally active males at rest: a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over trial. Obtusin ameliorates diabetic retinopathy by inhibiting oxidative stress and inflammation. Impact of vanilla flavor on nicotine taste, choice, intake, and seeking behaviors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1