Effects of a psychological first aid (PFA) based on the SIX Cs model on acute stress responses in a simulated emergency.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1037/tra0001724
Moshe Uriel Farchi, Lorin Bathish, Naomi Hayut, Shaked Alexander, Yori Gidron
{"title":"Effects of a psychological first aid (PFA) based on the SIX Cs model on acute stress responses in a simulated emergency.","authors":"Moshe Uriel Farchi, Lorin Bathish, Naomi Hayut, Shaked Alexander, Yori Gidron","doi":"10.1037/tra0001724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The SIX Cs model, a neuropsychological framework for psychological first aid, addresses acute stress responses that may lead to functional failure and heighten the risk for posttraumatic stress disorder. Unlike emotional interventions, this model prioritizes Cognitive Communication to diminish emotional overwhelm and bolster cognitive functioning. It introduces a Challenge for active engagement, Control for cognitive management of situations, Commitment from the helper to reduce loneliness, and Continuity to ensure narrative coherence. This study evaluates the SIX Cs model's effectiveness in an experimental setup to alleviate acute stress reaction symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixty-three participants voluntarily participated. They were randomly assigned to the SIX Cs intervention (experimental) or to supportive emotional expression (control). They listened to a 3-min audio recording of a real emergency 911 phone call. Interventions were provided before and after listening to the recording. Before, immediately after, and 5 min later (recovery), participants' anxiety, heart rate variability, and mental resilience levels were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all three outcomes, the Time × Group interactions were statistically significant. Follow-up analyses revealed that the SIX Cs participants showed lower anxiety and less reductions in heart rate variability and resilience than controls immediately after the stressor. Furthermore, the SIX Cs participants recovered faster on all three outcomes compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrate the superior effect of the psychological first aid based SIX C's protocol over control in all outcomes, immediately after a simulated stressor and 7 min later as well as possible contribution for posttraumatic stress disorder risk reduction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001724","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The SIX Cs model, a neuropsychological framework for psychological first aid, addresses acute stress responses that may lead to functional failure and heighten the risk for posttraumatic stress disorder. Unlike emotional interventions, this model prioritizes Cognitive Communication to diminish emotional overwhelm and bolster cognitive functioning. It introduces a Challenge for active engagement, Control for cognitive management of situations, Commitment from the helper to reduce loneliness, and Continuity to ensure narrative coherence. This study evaluates the SIX Cs model's effectiveness in an experimental setup to alleviate acute stress reaction symptoms.

Method: Sixty-three participants voluntarily participated. They were randomly assigned to the SIX Cs intervention (experimental) or to supportive emotional expression (control). They listened to a 3-min audio recording of a real emergency 911 phone call. Interventions were provided before and after listening to the recording. Before, immediately after, and 5 min later (recovery), participants' anxiety, heart rate variability, and mental resilience levels were measured.

Results: For all three outcomes, the Time × Group interactions were statistically significant. Follow-up analyses revealed that the SIX Cs participants showed lower anxiety and less reductions in heart rate variability and resilience than controls immediately after the stressor. Furthermore, the SIX Cs participants recovered faster on all three outcomes compared to controls.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate the superior effect of the psychological first aid based SIX C's protocol over control in all outcomes, immediately after a simulated stressor and 7 min later as well as possible contribution for posttraumatic stress disorder risk reduction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于 SIX Cs 模型的心理急救 (PFA) 对模拟紧急情况下急性应激反应的影响。
目的:SIX Cs 模式是一种用于心理急救的神经心理学框架,它针对的是可能导致功能衰竭和增加创伤后应激障碍风险的急性应激反应。与情绪干预不同的是,该模式优先考虑认知沟通,以减轻情绪压抑,增强认知功能。它引入了 "挑战"(Challenge)以促进积极参与;"控制"(Control)以对情况进行认知管理;"帮助者承诺"(Commitment)以减少孤独感;"持续"(Continuity)以确保叙述的连贯性。本研究评估了 SIX Cs 模型在减轻急性应激反应症状的实验设置中的有效性:方法:63 名参与者自愿参加。他们被随机分配到 SIX Cs 干预(实验组)或支持性情绪表达(对照组)。他们聆听了一段 3 分钟的真实 911 紧急电话录音。在听录音之前和之后进行干预。在听录音之前、之后和 5 分钟之后(恢复期),对参与者的焦虑、心率变异性和心理复原力水平进行了测量:结果:在所有三个结果中,时间 × 组的交互作用都具有统计学意义。后续分析表明,与对照组相比,SIX Cs 参与者在应激反应后的焦虑程度更低,心率变异性和恢复能力的降低程度更小。此外,与对照组相比,SIX Cs 参与者在所有三个结果上的恢复速度都更快:结果表明,基于心理急救的 SIX C's 方案在模拟压力源后立即和 7 分钟后的所有结果上都优于对照组,并可能有助于降低创伤后应激障碍的风险。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
期刊最新文献
Resilience in the aftermath of trauma: Classes of adjustment in at-risk youth. The latent transition of posttraumatic stress disorder and growth among adolescents surviving Jiuzhaigou earthquake. How trauma is represented on social media: Analysis of #trauma content on TikTok. Emotion dysregulation and posttraumatic stress symptom severity: The influence of cortisol reactivity following idiographic emotion inductions. The role of maternal postmigration living difficulties in intergenerational trauma transmission among asylum-seeker mother-child dyads: Exploring complex posttraumatic stress disorder as a mechanism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1