Response of patients with complex forms of PTSD to highly intensive trauma treatment: A clinical cohort study.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1037/tra0001747
Mayaris Zepeda Méndez, Mirjam J Nijdam, F Jackie June Ter Heide, Niels van der Aa, Miranda Olff
{"title":"Response of patients with complex forms of PTSD to highly intensive trauma treatment: A clinical cohort study.","authors":"Mayaris Zepeda Méndez, Mirjam J Nijdam, F Jackie June Ter Heide, Niels van der Aa, Miranda Olff","doi":"10.1037/tra0001747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although highly intensive trauma treatment programs show promising results in the treatment of patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), it remains uncertain if patients with complex forms of PTSD can benefit equally from these intensive programs. To investigate whether patients with the dissociative subtype of PTSD (PTSD + DS) and patients with probable complex PTSD (CPTSD) draw equal benefits from a highly intensive trauma treatment program as patients with PTSD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this clinical cohort study, patients were included who attended a 5-day intensive program consisting of eye movement desensitisation reprocessing, exposure in vivo and trauma-sensitive yoga components. PTSD with DS was assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition</i> (CAPS-5), and a provisional diagnosis of CPTSD was assessed with the International Trauma Questionnaire. Primary outcome measure was self-reported PTSD-symptom severity measured by PTSD Checklist for <i>DSM</i>-5 at the start of the program (T1) and a week after the program (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups, PTSD + DS (<i>d</i> = 0.85) and probable CPTSD (<i>d</i> = 0.85) benefitted significantly in terms of PTSD-symptom severity reduction and the size of the decrease was not significantly different from that of patients with PTSD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with both forms of PTSD complexity can benefit even from a very brief intensive treatment program, which extends previous studies. The diagnoses of PTSD + DS and CPTSD seem helpful to assess the initial severity of the symptoms, but do not imply contra-indications to benefit from intensive treatment. Highly intensive treatment programs are promising interventions to effectively treat complex forms of PTSD and should be studied further in randomized clinical trials. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although highly intensive trauma treatment programs show promising results in the treatment of patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), it remains uncertain if patients with complex forms of PTSD can benefit equally from these intensive programs. To investigate whether patients with the dissociative subtype of PTSD (PTSD + DS) and patients with probable complex PTSD (CPTSD) draw equal benefits from a highly intensive trauma treatment program as patients with PTSD.

Method: In this clinical cohort study, patients were included who attended a 5-day intensive program consisting of eye movement desensitisation reprocessing, exposure in vivo and trauma-sensitive yoga components. PTSD with DS was assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (CAPS-5), and a provisional diagnosis of CPTSD was assessed with the International Trauma Questionnaire. Primary outcome measure was self-reported PTSD-symptom severity measured by PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 at the start of the program (T1) and a week after the program (T2).

Results: Both groups, PTSD + DS (d = 0.85) and probable CPTSD (d = 0.85) benefitted significantly in terms of PTSD-symptom severity reduction and the size of the decrease was not significantly different from that of patients with PTSD.

Conclusions: Patients with both forms of PTSD complexity can benefit even from a very brief intensive treatment program, which extends previous studies. The diagnoses of PTSD + DS and CPTSD seem helpful to assess the initial severity of the symptoms, but do not imply contra-indications to benefit from intensive treatment. Highly intensive treatment programs are promising interventions to effectively treat complex forms of PTSD and should be studied further in randomized clinical trials. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复杂形式创伤后应激障碍患者对高度强化创伤治疗的反应:临床队列研究。
目的:尽管高强度创伤治疗项目在治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者方面取得了可喜的成果,但复杂形式的创伤后应激障碍患者能否同样从这些高强度项目中获益仍不确定。本研究旨在探讨创伤后应激障碍分离亚型患者(创伤后应激障碍+DS)和疑似复杂型创伤后应激障碍患者(CPTSD)是否能与创伤后应激障碍患者一样从高度强化的创伤治疗项目中获益:在这项临床队列研究中,患者参加了为期 5 天的强化治疗项目,其中包括眼动脱敏再处理疗法、暴露于体内疗法和创伤敏感瑜伽。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(CAPS-5)中的临床医师管理创伤后应激障碍量表评估伴有DS的创伤后应激障碍,并使用国际创伤问卷评估CPTSD的临时诊断。主要研究结果是在项目开始时(T1)和项目结束一周后(T2),通过PTSD Checklist for DSM-5(创伤后应激障碍核对表)测量自我报告的创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度:结果:创伤后应激障碍+DS(d = 0.85)和可能患有 CPTSD(d = 0.85)的两组患者在减轻创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度方面都明显受益,而且减轻程度与创伤后应激障碍患者没有明显差异:结论:两种形式的创伤后应激障碍患者都能从非常简短的强化治疗计划中获益,这是对以往研究的延伸。创伤后应激障碍+DS和创伤后应激障碍的诊断似乎有助于评估症状的初始严重程度,但并不意味着强化治疗的禁忌症。高度强化治疗方案是有效治疗复杂形式创伤后应激障碍的有前途的干预措施,应在随机临床试验中进一步研究。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
期刊最新文献
Assessing the existence of trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in adult populations. A current challenge in classification and treatment of DSM-5-TR prolonged grief disorder. Posttraumatic stress disorder in diverse populations: Testing for assessment bias in a nationally representative sample. Revisiting the hidden wound: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic violence and divorce in Taiwan (2020-2021). Testing the nightmare cognitive arousal processing model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1