Development and Validation of the Saudi Telehealth Acceptance Scale Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_358_23
Abdullah A Almojaibel
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Saudi Telehealth Acceptance Scale Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.","authors":"Abdullah A Almojaibel","doi":"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_358_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth is in early stages in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Identifying barriers to using telehealth is an essential step prior to its implementation; however, no theoretically based scales exist for the same purpose.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To design a theory-based scale capable of measuring telehealth users' perceptions of benefits, barriers, and social influence in the KSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Saudi Telehealth Acceptance Scale (STAS) was constructed based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and its content validity was determined by eight experts using the modified Delphi process. Only items with a content validity index score of ≥0.83 were chosen. Finally, the face validity of the questionnaire for healthcare professionals, which was in English, was determined by eight healthcare professionals, and for the patient version, which was in Arabic, by six patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, 37 items were identified; however, after Round 1, 29 items remained and after Round 2, 24 items were included in the STAS for both healthcare professionals and patients. In the healthcare professionals scale, there were 7 performance expectancy (PE) items, 6 effort expectancy (EE) items, 3 social influence (SI) items, 4 facilitating conditions (FC) items, and 4 behavioral intention (BI) items, while in the scale for patients, there were 9 PE items, 4 EE items, 3 SI items, 4 FC items, and 4 BI items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two new scales showed evidence of content and face validity. The significance of the two scales is that they were both designed in the context of the healthcare system in the KSA and could provide standardized data collection tools to measure the acceptance of telehealth among HCPs and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21442,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_358_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telehealth is in early stages in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Identifying barriers to using telehealth is an essential step prior to its implementation; however, no theoretically based scales exist for the same purpose.

Objective: To design a theory-based scale capable of measuring telehealth users' perceptions of benefits, barriers, and social influence in the KSA.

Methods: The Saudi Telehealth Acceptance Scale (STAS) was constructed based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and its content validity was determined by eight experts using the modified Delphi process. Only items with a content validity index score of ≥0.83 were chosen. Finally, the face validity of the questionnaire for healthcare professionals, which was in English, was determined by eight healthcare professionals, and for the patient version, which was in Arabic, by six patients.

Results: Initially, 37 items were identified; however, after Round 1, 29 items remained and after Round 2, 24 items were included in the STAS for both healthcare professionals and patients. In the healthcare professionals scale, there were 7 performance expectancy (PE) items, 6 effort expectancy (EE) items, 3 social influence (SI) items, 4 facilitating conditions (FC) items, and 4 behavioral intention (BI) items, while in the scale for patients, there were 9 PE items, 4 EE items, 3 SI items, 4 FC items, and 4 BI items.

Conclusions: The two new scales showed evidence of content and face validity. The significance of the two scales is that they were both designed in the context of the healthcare system in the KSA and could provide standardized data collection tools to measure the acceptance of telehealth among HCPs and patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于接受和使用技术统一理论的沙特远程保健接受量表的开发和验证。
背景:远程保健在沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)尚处于早期阶段。确定使用远程保健的障碍是实施远程保健前的重要一步;然而,目前还没有基于理论的量表可用于同样的目的:目的:设计一种基于理论的量表,用于测量沙特阿拉伯远程医疗用户对远程医疗的益处、障碍和社会影响的看法:方法:沙特远程保健接受量表(STAS)是根据技术接受和使用统一理论构建的,其内容效度由八位专家通过修改后的德尔菲程序确定。只有内容效度指数得分≥0.83 的项目才被选中。最后,8 名医护专业人员和 6 名患者分别对英文版和阿拉伯文版的医护专业人员问卷和患者问卷进行了面效度判定:最初确定了 37 个项目,但经过第一轮后,剩下了 29 个项目,而经过第二轮后,医护人员和患者的 STAS 均纳入了 24 个项目。在医护人员量表中,有 7 个绩效期望(PE)项目、6 个努力期望(EE)项目、3 个社会影响(SI)项目、4 个促进条件(FC)项目和 4 个行为意向(BI)项目;而在患者量表中,有 9 个绩效期望(PE)项目、4 个努力期望(EE)项目、3 个社会影响(SI)项目、4 个促进条件(FC)项目和 4 个行为意向(BI)项目:结论:这两个新量表在内容效度和表面效度方面均表现良好。这两个量表的意义在于,它们都是根据 KSA 医疗保健系统的情况设计的,可以提供标准化的数据收集工具,用于衡量保健人员和患者对远程保健的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences (SJMMS) is the official scientific journal of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. It is an international peer-reviewed, general medical journal. The scope of the Journal is to publish research that will be of interest to health specialties both in academic and clinical practice. The Journal aims at disseminating high-powered research results with the objective of turning research into knowledge. It seeks to promote scholarly publishing in medicine and medical sciences. The Journal is published in print and online. The target readers of the Journal include all medical and health professionals in the health cluster such as in medicine, dentistry, nursing, applied medical sciences, clinical pharmacology, public health, etc.
期刊最新文献
Correlation between Illness Perception and Medication Adherence among Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Saudi Arabia. Development and Validation of the Saudi Telehealth Acceptance Scale Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Effectiveness of Audiovisual Distraction in Reducing Children's Anxiety for Pain During Medical and Dental Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Enhancing the Central Venous Catheterization Competency of Medical Students through a Specialized Team and an Interactive Response System: A pre-post study. Frequency and Determinants of Depression in Hypothyroidism Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1