Reoperation Rates After Initial Thyroid Lobectomy for Patients with Thyroid Cancer: A National Cohort Study.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Thyroid Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1089/thy.2024.0128
Marin Kheng, Alexander Manzella, Joshua C Chao, Amanda M Laird, Toni Beninato
{"title":"Reoperation Rates After Initial Thyroid Lobectomy for Patients with Thyroid Cancer: A National Cohort Study.","authors":"Marin Kheng, Alexander Manzella, Joshua C Chao, Amanda M Laird, Toni Beninato","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommended thyroid lobectomy (TL) as an alternative to total thyroidectomy (TT) for the surgical treatment of low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer. Increasing use of TL has since been reported despite concerns for an increased risk of disease recurrence and need for reoperation. This study sought to compare reoperation rates among patients who underwent initial TL or TT for malignancy, characterize trends at centers based on operative volume, and examine factors associated with reoperation. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We queried the Vizient Clinical Data Base for TL and TT performed preguideline change (pre-GC = 2013-2015) and postguideline change (post-GC = 2016-2021). Reoperations included reoperative thyroid surgery (RTS) and neck dissection (ND); timing was defined as early (≤180 days), thought to indicate inadequacy of initial operative choice, or late (>180 days), suggesting potential disease recurrence. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 65,627 patients, 31.8% underwent initial TL and 68.2% underwent initial TT; TL increased from 21.4% of total cases pre-GC to 37.0% post-GC (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Among TL patients, early RTS declined from 33.9% to 14.2% and ND declined from 0.8% to 0.4% (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Among TT patients, early RTS remained 0.2%, while ND increased from 0.4% to 0.7% (<i>p</i> < 0.001). TL-associated late RTS declined from 2.0% to 1.7%, while ND increased from 0.6% to 0.8% (<i>p</i> = 0.17). In TT patients, both late RTS and ND increased, from 0.2% to 0.3% (<i>p</i> = 0.04) and 1.7% to 2.1% (<i>p</i> < 0.01), respectively. There was no difference in the late reoperation rate for TL compared with TT post-GC (+0.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.18). TL volume grew annually by 12.5% [8.9-16.2%] at high-volume centers (HVCs) and 8.3% [5.6-11.1%] at low-volume centers (LVCs). TL-associated reoperations at HVCs declined annually by 12.6% [5.6-19.0%] and 10.8% [2.7-18.1%] at LVCs. Uninsured status and more recent initial operation were associated with an increased risk of late reoperation (HR = 1.84 [1.06-3.20] and HR = 1.30 [1.24-1.36], respectively). The type of index operation performed, however, was not predictive of late reoperation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The rate of early reoperations declined for TL after the 2015 ATA guideline release, but late reoperations remained unchanged despite a significant shift in practice patterns towards initial lobectomy. Patients appear to be receiving less aggressive, guideline-concordant care without a significant increase in the late reoperation rate for TL compared with TT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":"1007-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0128","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommended thyroid lobectomy (TL) as an alternative to total thyroidectomy (TT) for the surgical treatment of low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer. Increasing use of TL has since been reported despite concerns for an increased risk of disease recurrence and need for reoperation. This study sought to compare reoperation rates among patients who underwent initial TL or TT for malignancy, characterize trends at centers based on operative volume, and examine factors associated with reoperation. Methods: We queried the Vizient Clinical Data Base for TL and TT performed preguideline change (pre-GC = 2013-2015) and postguideline change (post-GC = 2016-2021). Reoperations included reoperative thyroid surgery (RTS) and neck dissection (ND); timing was defined as early (≤180 days), thought to indicate inadequacy of initial operative choice, or late (>180 days), suggesting potential disease recurrence. Results: Of 65,627 patients, 31.8% underwent initial TL and 68.2% underwent initial TT; TL increased from 21.4% of total cases pre-GC to 37.0% post-GC (p < 0.001). Among TL patients, early RTS declined from 33.9% to 14.2% and ND declined from 0.8% to 0.4% (p < 0.001). Among TT patients, early RTS remained 0.2%, while ND increased from 0.4% to 0.7% (p < 0.001). TL-associated late RTS declined from 2.0% to 1.7%, while ND increased from 0.6% to 0.8% (p = 0.17). In TT patients, both late RTS and ND increased, from 0.2% to 0.3% (p = 0.04) and 1.7% to 2.1% (p < 0.01), respectively. There was no difference in the late reoperation rate for TL compared with TT post-GC (+0.2%, p = 0.18). TL volume grew annually by 12.5% [8.9-16.2%] at high-volume centers (HVCs) and 8.3% [5.6-11.1%] at low-volume centers (LVCs). TL-associated reoperations at HVCs declined annually by 12.6% [5.6-19.0%] and 10.8% [2.7-18.1%] at LVCs. Uninsured status and more recent initial operation were associated with an increased risk of late reoperation (HR = 1.84 [1.06-3.20] and HR = 1.30 [1.24-1.36], respectively). The type of index operation performed, however, was not predictive of late reoperation. Conclusions: The rate of early reoperations declined for TL after the 2015 ATA guideline release, but late reoperations remained unchanged despite a significant shift in practice patterns towards initial lobectomy. Patients appear to be receiving less aggressive, guideline-concordant care without a significant increase in the late reoperation rate for TL compared with TT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺癌患者初次甲状腺叶切除术后的再手术率:全国队列研究
导言:2015 年 ATA 指南推荐将甲状腺叶切除术(TL)作为甲状腺全切除术(TT)的替代方案,用于低风险分化型甲状腺癌的手术治疗。尽管存在疾病复发风险增加和需要再次手术的担忧,但自此以后,TL的使用报道越来越多。本研究旨在比较初次接受 TL 或 TT 治疗的恶性肿瘤患者的再手术率,根据手术量分析各中心的趋势,并研究与再手术相关的因素。方法 我们在 Vizient 临床数据库中查询了指南修改前(pre-GC=2013-2015)和指南修改后(post-GC=2016-2021)进行的 TL 和 TT。再手术包括甲状腺再手术(RTS)和颈部切除术(ND);时间定义为早期(180 天)或晚期(>180 天),前者表明初始手术选择不当,后者表明疾病复发。结果 在65,627例患者中,31.8%接受了初始TL,68.2%接受了初始TT;TL从GC前占总病例的21.4%增加到GC后的37.0%(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thyroid
Thyroid 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
195
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes. Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.
期刊最新文献
Examining Why Thyroid Cancer Incidence Is High in Women. Differential Ultrasound Rates Mirror Sex Disparities in Thyroid Cancer. Irwin Klein, MD (1946-2024). Surgical and Pathological Challenges in Thyroidectomy after Thermal Ablation of Thyroid Nodules. Association Between Environmental Air Pollution and Thyroid Cancer and Nodules: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1