Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and serum procalcitonin level as a predictor of spontaneous ureteral stone passage: A prospective study.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1177/03915603241254957
Gaurav Faujdar, Sanjeev Jaiswal, Satyaveer Singh, Rahul Singh, Prashant Sevach, Saurabh Negi, Shivam Priyadarshi
{"title":"Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and serum procalcitonin level as a predictor of spontaneous ureteral stone passage: A prospective study.","authors":"Gaurav Faujdar, Sanjeev Jaiswal, Satyaveer Singh, Rahul Singh, Prashant Sevach, Saurabh Negi, Shivam Priyadarshi","doi":"10.1177/03915603241254957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ureteric stone is responsible for around 20% of urinary tract stones and among them 70% of these are located in distal portion of the ureter. Stone causing ureter obstruction produce inflammatory changes in ureteric wall and prevent spontaneous passage of stone. The objective of the study is to compare the predictive role of procalcitonin and Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for spontaneous passage of stone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methodology: </strong>Total 150 participants having ureteric stone of 4-8 mm, were included in prospective observational study. The patients were followed up for 4 weeks. Spontaneous Stone Passage (SSP) was confirmed with either the patient collecting the stone during urination or by Non-Contrast CT performed at 4 weeks. Blood samples of the patients were analysed and White blood cells, sedimentation, Neutrophile to Lymphocyte (NLR), procalcitonin level compared to analyse predictors of future SSP.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The procalcitonin levels of the Spontaneous stone passing SSP (-ve) group (209.05 ± 78.45 pg/ml) were significantly higher than the not passing the SSP (+ve) group (130.76 ± 24.18) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). NLR is significantly higher in the SSP -ve (3.84 ± 0.41) than the SSP +ve (2.18 ± 0.38) group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In single and multivariate analysis, significant activity was found for procalcitonin in SP +ve group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of the study suggests that high level of procalcitonin, and high NLR have a negative effect on passage of stone. So early intervention can be planned to these patients to prevent complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"748-754"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241254957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ureteric stone is responsible for around 20% of urinary tract stones and among them 70% of these are located in distal portion of the ureter. Stone causing ureter obstruction produce inflammatory changes in ureteric wall and prevent spontaneous passage of stone. The objective of the study is to compare the predictive role of procalcitonin and Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for spontaneous passage of stone.

Materials and methodology: Total 150 participants having ureteric stone of 4-8 mm, were included in prospective observational study. The patients were followed up for 4 weeks. Spontaneous Stone Passage (SSP) was confirmed with either the patient collecting the stone during urination or by Non-Contrast CT performed at 4 weeks. Blood samples of the patients were analysed and White blood cells, sedimentation, Neutrophile to Lymphocyte (NLR), procalcitonin level compared to analyse predictors of future SSP.

Result: The procalcitonin levels of the Spontaneous stone passing SSP (-ve) group (209.05 ± 78.45 pg/ml) were significantly higher than the not passing the SSP (+ve) group (130.76 ± 24.18) (p < 0.001). NLR is significantly higher in the SSP -ve (3.84 ± 0.41) than the SSP +ve (2.18 ± 0.38) group (p < 0.001). In single and multivariate analysis, significant activity was found for procalcitonin in SP +ve group.

Conclusion: The findings of the study suggests that high level of procalcitonin, and high NLR have a negative effect on passage of stone. So early intervention can be planned to these patients to prevent complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率和血清降钙素原水平作为自发性输尿管结石通过的预测指标:前瞻性研究。
背景:输尿管结石约占尿路结石的 20%,其中 70% 位于输尿管远端。导致输尿管梗阻的结石会使输尿管壁产生炎症变化,阻碍结石的自然排出。本研究旨在比较降钙素原和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)对结石自发通过的预测作用:前瞻性观察研究共纳入 150 名输尿管结石(4-8 毫米)患者。对患者进行了为期 4 周的随访。通过患者在排尿时收集结石或在 4 周后进行非对比 CT 检查来确认是否有结石自发排出(SSP)。对患者的血样进行分析,比较白细胞、血沉、嗜中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比(NLR)、降钙素原水平,以分析未来 SSP 的预测因素:结果:自发性结石通过 SSP(-ve)组的降钙素原水平(209.05 ± 78.45 pg/ml)明显高于未通过 SSP(+ve)组(130.76 ± 24.18)(p p 结论:自发性结石通过 SSP(-ve)组的降钙素原水平(209.05 ± 78.45 pg/ml)明显高于未通过 SSP(+ve)组(130.76 ± 24.18):研究结果表明,高水平的降钙素原和高 NLR 对通过结石有负面影响。因此,可以计划对这些患者进行早期干预,以预防并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for benign uretero-enteric anastomotic strictures after open radical cystectomy and ileal conduit. On integrative analysis of multi-level gene expression data in Kidney cancer subgrouping. A new approach to repair recurrent vescicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical prostatectomy: The use of prerectal access. Potential value of Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 score in prediction of final cancer pathology parameters in radical prostatectomy patients. Retrograde urethrography (RUG) combined with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) versus surgical findings in assessment of urethral strictures length.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1