Esophagogastric cancer surgery characteristics and outcomes in bariatric patients, compared with non-bariatric patients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Minerva Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10304-8
Yonatan Lessing, Adam Abu-Abeid, Ela Falk, Guy Lahat, Eran Nizri, Danit Dayan
{"title":"Esophagogastric cancer surgery characteristics and outcomes in bariatric patients, compared with non-bariatric patients.","authors":"Yonatan Lessing, Adam Abu-Abeid, Ela Falk, Guy Lahat, Eran Nizri, Danit Dayan","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10304-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between bariatric surgery and esophagogastric cancer (EGC) is debated. This study aimed to assess EGC characteristics and surgery outcomes comparing bariatric and non-bariatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective analysis of prospective EGC surgery database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EGC-surgery was performed in 269 patients, classified as bariatric (N.=10, 3.3%), and non-bariatric (N.=259, 96.6%) groups. Non-bariatric group was sub-classified into body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (N.=244) and >35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (N.=15). BMI was 35.3±5.6 vs. 25.7±16.1 and 37.8±8.7 kg/m2 in bariatric vs. non-bariatric-BMI <35 and >35, respectively (P<0.001). Bariatric patients were significantly younger (56.75±11 vs. 71±10 and 68.38±8.2 years; P<0.001). They tended to have lower rates of diabetes mellitus (30% vs. 43.9% and 73.3%; P=0.05) and significantly lower hypertension rates (50%, vs.86.5% and 93.3%, P<0.004). Bariatric procedures were performed 11.3 years (IQR 5.5-16.5) prior to EGC-surgery. Tumor characteristics were statistically comparable except a significantly higher number of positive LN in the bariatric group (6.9±13.6 vs. 2.7±4.9 and 1.9±4.8; P=0.006), and more bariatric patients received adjuvant treatment (P=0.035). Postoperative major complication rates (0% vs. 25.8%, and 33.3%; P=0.14) and length of hospital stay (14.1±15.3, vs. 23±28.5, and 21±18 days; P=0.59) were comparable. There was no significant difference in Disease- free survival (P=0.42) or overall survival (P=0.48) between patient-groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bariatric patients were diagnosed with EGC at a younger age, and tended to have worse nodal involvement. Although outcomes were comparable, clinical and endoscopic surveillance seem important as EGC can occur 10 years or earlier than in non-bariatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":29847,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10304-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association between bariatric surgery and esophagogastric cancer (EGC) is debated. This study aimed to assess EGC characteristics and surgery outcomes comparing bariatric and non-bariatric patients.

Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of prospective EGC surgery database.

Results: EGC-surgery was performed in 269 patients, classified as bariatric (N.=10, 3.3%), and non-bariatric (N.=259, 96.6%) groups. Non-bariatric group was sub-classified into body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m2 (N.=244) and >35 kg/m2 (N.=15). BMI was 35.3±5.6 vs. 25.7±16.1 and 37.8±8.7 kg/m2 in bariatric vs. non-bariatric-BMI <35 and >35, respectively (P<0.001). Bariatric patients were significantly younger (56.75±11 vs. 71±10 and 68.38±8.2 years; P<0.001). They tended to have lower rates of diabetes mellitus (30% vs. 43.9% and 73.3%; P=0.05) and significantly lower hypertension rates (50%, vs.86.5% and 93.3%, P<0.004). Bariatric procedures were performed 11.3 years (IQR 5.5-16.5) prior to EGC-surgery. Tumor characteristics were statistically comparable except a significantly higher number of positive LN in the bariatric group (6.9±13.6 vs. 2.7±4.9 and 1.9±4.8; P=0.006), and more bariatric patients received adjuvant treatment (P=0.035). Postoperative major complication rates (0% vs. 25.8%, and 33.3%; P=0.14) and length of hospital stay (14.1±15.3, vs. 23±28.5, and 21±18 days; P=0.59) were comparable. There was no significant difference in Disease- free survival (P=0.42) or overall survival (P=0.48) between patient-groups.

Conclusions: Bariatric patients were diagnosed with EGC at a younger age, and tended to have worse nodal involvement. Although outcomes were comparable, clinical and endoscopic surveillance seem important as EGC can occur 10 years or earlier than in non-bariatric patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与非减肥患者相比,减肥患者的食管胃癌手术特点和结果。
背景:减肥手术与食管胃癌(EGC)之间的关系存在争议。本研究旨在对减肥患者和非减肥患者的食管胃癌特征和手术结果进行评估:方法:对前瞻性EGC手术数据库进行单中心回顾性分析:269名患者接受了EGC手术,分为减肥组(10人,占3.3%)和非减肥组(259人,占96.6%)。非减肥组又分为体重指数(BMI)2(N.=244)和>35 kg/m2(N.=15)两组。肥胖组与非肥胖组体重指数分别为 35.3±5.6 和 25.7±16.1 和 37.8±8.7 kg/m2(PC 结论:肥胖组与非肥胖组体重指数分别为 35.3±5.6 和 25.7±16.1 和 37.8±8.7 kg/m2:减肥患者被确诊为EGC的年龄更小,结节受累情况更严重。虽然结果相当,但临床和内窥镜监测似乎很重要,因为EGC可能在10年前或比非减肥患者更早发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Surgery
Minerva Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
320
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the influence of different surgical methods on the gynecological endocrine status of uterine fibroids. Analysis of the value of combined measurement of serum immunoglobulin G and subtype immunoglobulin G4 in adult autoimmune glomerulonephritis. Effect of preoperative visit combined with comfort nursing in operating room nursing and postoperative hypothermia incidence and its application. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy performed with the Endo GIA™ Stapler as an easy and safe approach. The application value of the multidisciplinary team model led by specialist nurses in pressure ulcer management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1