Knowledge and Practice in Cochlear Re-Implantation in the UK: A Survey for Audiologists.

IF 2.1 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Audiology Research Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.3390/audiolres14040055
Muhammed Ayas, Rosalyn Parker, David Muir, Jameel Muzaffar
{"title":"Knowledge and Practice in Cochlear Re-Implantation in the UK: A Survey for Audiologists.","authors":"Muhammed Ayas, Rosalyn Parker, David Muir, Jameel Muzaffar","doi":"10.3390/audiolres14040055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cochlear implantation (CI) has proven to be a highly effective method for rehabilitating individuals with severe to profound hearing loss. However, challenges persist, particularly in cases where CI failure necessitates re-implantation. This study aims to address the gap in understanding the knowledge and practices of audiologists in the UK regarding cochlear re-implantation through a comprehensive questionnaire survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bespoke questionnaire was distributed to audiologists working with CI across the UK. The survey, which included multiple-choice items, open-text responses, and visual analogue scales, was made accessible via an online link shared through professional bodies, email groups, and social media platforms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey received 27 responses, predominantly from female audiologists (71.4%), with significant representation from London (28.6%) and the East of England (21.4%). A majority of respondents had over 16 years of CI experience (35.7%) and held a master's degree (60.7%). Key reasons for CI re-implantation included electrode failure (82.1%) and hermetic seal failure (60.7%). While respondents showed strong confidence in counselling (88.8%) and managing re-implanted devices (84.6%), there was a noted variation in opinions regarding the need for additional training in intraoperative measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey highlights the current practices and training needs of UK audiologists in CI re-implantation. This underscores the importance of targeted training to fill knowledge gaps and improve clinical care during CI re-implantation, ultimately enhancing outcomes for both audiologists and CI recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"14 4","pages":"649-658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres14040055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) has proven to be a highly effective method for rehabilitating individuals with severe to profound hearing loss. However, challenges persist, particularly in cases where CI failure necessitates re-implantation. This study aims to address the gap in understanding the knowledge and practices of audiologists in the UK regarding cochlear re-implantation through a comprehensive questionnaire survey.

Methods: A bespoke questionnaire was distributed to audiologists working with CI across the UK. The survey, which included multiple-choice items, open-text responses, and visual analogue scales, was made accessible via an online link shared through professional bodies, email groups, and social media platforms.

Results: The survey received 27 responses, predominantly from female audiologists (71.4%), with significant representation from London (28.6%) and the East of England (21.4%). A majority of respondents had over 16 years of CI experience (35.7%) and held a master's degree (60.7%). Key reasons for CI re-implantation included electrode failure (82.1%) and hermetic seal failure (60.7%). While respondents showed strong confidence in counselling (88.8%) and managing re-implanted devices (84.6%), there was a noted variation in opinions regarding the need for additional training in intraoperative measures.

Conclusion: This survey highlights the current practices and training needs of UK audiologists in CI re-implantation. This underscores the importance of targeted training to fill knowledge gaps and improve clinical care during CI re-implantation, ultimately enhancing outcomes for both audiologists and CI recipients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国人工耳蜗再植入的知识和实践:听力学家调查。
背景:事实证明,人工耳蜗植入(CI)是重度到极重度听力损失患者康复的一种非常有效的方法。然而,挑战依然存在,尤其是在 CI 失效需要再次植入的情况下。本研究旨在通过全面的问卷调查,了解英国听力学家在人工耳蜗再植入方面的知识和实践:方法:向全英国从事人工耳蜗工作的听力学家发放了一份定制问卷。调查内容包括多项选择题、开放文本回答和视觉模拟量表,通过专业机构、电子邮件群组和社交媒体平台共享的在线链接进行访问:调查共收到 27 份回复,主要来自女性听力学家(71.4%),伦敦(28.6%)和英格兰东部(21.4%)的受访者人数较多。大多数受访者拥有超过 16 年的 CI 经验(35.7%),并拥有硕士学位(60.7%)。再次植入 CI 的主要原因包括电极故障(82.1%)和密封失败(60.7%)。虽然受访者对咨询(88.8%)和管理再植入设备(84.6%)表现出很强的信心,但对是否需要在术中措施方面进行额外培训的意见存在显著差异:这项调查强调了英国听力学家目前在 CI 再植入方面的实践和培训需求。结论:这项调查强调了英国听力学家目前在人工耳蜗再植入方面的做法和培训需求,突出了有针对性的培训对填补知识空白和改善人工耳蜗再植入过程中的临床护理的重要性,最终提高听力学家和人工耳蜗接受者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study Across Multiple Hearing Domains. Can Hearing Aids Improve Physical Activity in Adults with Hearing Loss? A Feasibility Study. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory Total Score: What Really Counts? Experience on a Sample of 1156 Patients. Visual Reliance in Severe Hearing Loss: Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) Study. Predictive Factors for Hearing Loss in Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1