In Vitro Study of Tensile Strength Comparison of Selected Nonabsorbable and Absorbable Suture Materials after Immersion in 0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate.

IF 2.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-06-27 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_162_23
Ezra Emmanuel B Ching, Teeranut Chaiyasamut, Chakorn Vorakulpipat
{"title":"<i>In Vitro</i> Study of Tensile Strength Comparison of Selected Nonabsorbable and Absorbable Suture Materials after Immersion in 0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate.","authors":"Ezra Emmanuel B Ching, Teeranut Chaiyasamut, Chakorn Vorakulpipat","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_162_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the tensile strength (TS) of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials after immersion in 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six 4-0-gauge suture materials were used, namely silk (S), polypropylene (PP), polyamide 6 (PA6), polyglactin 910 (PG910), poliglecaprone 25 (PL25), and polydioxanone (PDX). A total of 540 suture materials were divided equally (90) into six groups and tested. These materials were divided into a nonimmersed condition (10) and two thermostatically controlled immersion media (40 each), using artificial saliva for the control group (CG) and 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate for the test group (TG). The specimens were tied to prefabricated rubber rods before immersion and removed at the testing timepoint. By using a universal testing machine (Instron 5566) with hooks attached, a hook-mounted specimen TS testing was performed on days 0, 1, 3, 7, and 14 at a 10 mm/min crosshead speed until the material was stretched to failure, and the maximum TS was recorded in Newtons (N). The continuous variables were taken as the mean and standard deviation across the six study groups to assess the significance at <i>α</i> = 0.05. A two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to assess the TSs over time in different media. A Bonferroni correction was performed when the data were statistically significant according to a two-factor ANOVA. Intragroup statistical comparisons were performed by repeated ANOVA for each study group. All data were analyzed using SPSS 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The suture material TS analysis showed that nonabsorbable suture materials maintained their TS throughout the study; silk exhibited different behaviors, decreasing in TS from baseline to day 1 and maintaining its TS until day 14. All absorbable suture materials decreased in TSs by day 14. The silk and PG910 samples in the TG performed significantly better than those in the CG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prescribing 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate as a postsurgical mouth rinse is safest when silk and PG910 are the optimal suture materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":47247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","volume":"14 3","pages":"201-210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_162_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the tensile strength (TS) of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials after immersion in 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate.

Materials and methods: Six 4-0-gauge suture materials were used, namely silk (S), polypropylene (PP), polyamide 6 (PA6), polyglactin 910 (PG910), poliglecaprone 25 (PL25), and polydioxanone (PDX). A total of 540 suture materials were divided equally (90) into six groups and tested. These materials were divided into a nonimmersed condition (10) and two thermostatically controlled immersion media (40 each), using artificial saliva for the control group (CG) and 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate for the test group (TG). The specimens were tied to prefabricated rubber rods before immersion and removed at the testing timepoint. By using a universal testing machine (Instron 5566) with hooks attached, a hook-mounted specimen TS testing was performed on days 0, 1, 3, 7, and 14 at a 10 mm/min crosshead speed until the material was stretched to failure, and the maximum TS was recorded in Newtons (N). The continuous variables were taken as the mean and standard deviation across the six study groups to assess the significance at α = 0.05. A two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to assess the TSs over time in different media. A Bonferroni correction was performed when the data were statistically significant according to a two-factor ANOVA. Intragroup statistical comparisons were performed by repeated ANOVA for each study group. All data were analyzed using SPSS 26.

Results: The suture material TS analysis showed that nonabsorbable suture materials maintained their TS throughout the study; silk exhibited different behaviors, decreasing in TS from baseline to day 1 and maintaining its TS until day 14. All absorbable suture materials decreased in TSs by day 14. The silk and PG910 samples in the TG performed significantly better than those in the CG.

Conclusions: Prescribing 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate as a postsurgical mouth rinse is safest when silk and PG910 are the optimal suture materials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选定的不可吸收和可吸收缝合材料在 0.12% 洗必泰葡萄糖酸盐中浸泡后的拉伸强度比较体外研究。
目的:比较可吸收和不可吸收缝合材料在 0.12% 洗必泰葡萄糖酸盐中浸泡后的拉伸强度(TS):使用了六种 4-0 号缝合材料,即蚕丝 (S)、聚丙烯 (PP)、聚酰胺 6 (PA6)、聚乳酸 910 (PG910)、聚乙二醇卡波隆 25 (PL25) 和聚二氧杂蒽酮 (PDX)。总共 540 种缝合材料被平均分成六组(90 种)进行测试。这些材料分为非浸泡状态(10 种)和两种恒温控制浸泡介质(各 40 种),对照组(CG)使用人工唾液,测试组(TG)使用 0.12% 的葡萄糖酸氯己定。浸泡前将试样绑在预制橡胶棒上,并在测试时间点取下。使用带挂钩的万能试验机(Instron 5566),在第 0、1、3、7 和 14 天以 10 毫米/分钟的十字头速度对挂钩试样进行 TS 测试,直到材料拉伸至破坏为止,并以牛顿(N)为单位记录最大 TS 值。连续变量取六个研究组的平均值和标准偏差,在 α = 0.05 时进行显著性评估。采用双因素方差分析(ANOVA)来评估不同介质中不同时间的 TSs。当双因素方差分析得出的数据具有统计学意义时,进行 Bonferroni 校正。各研究组的组内统计比较通过重复方差分析进行。所有数据均使用 SPSS 26 进行分析:缝合材料 TS 分析表明,非吸收性缝合材料在整个研究期间保持其 TS;蚕丝表现出不同的行为,从基线到第 1 天,其 TS 一直在下降,直到第 14 天。所有可吸收缝合材料的 TS 在第 14 天前都有所下降。TG中的蚕丝和PG910样本的表现明显优于CG中的样本:结论:当丝线和 PG910 是最佳缝合材料时,将 0.12% 的葡萄糖酸氯己定作为术后漱口剂是最安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: It is a journal aimed for research, scientific facts and details covering all specialties of dentistry with a good determination for exploring and sharing the knowledge in the medical and dental fraternity. The scope is therefore huge covering almost all streams of dentistry - starting from original studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, very unique case reports. Journal scope is not limited to these subjects and is more wider covering all specialities of dentistry follows: -Preventive and Community dentistry (Dental public health)- Endodontics- Oral and maxillofacial pathology- Oral and maxillofacial radiology- Oral and maxillofacial surgery (also called oral surgery)- Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics- Periodontology (also called periodontics)- Pediatric dentistry (also called pedodontics)- Prosthodontics (also called prosthetic dentistry)- Oral medicine- Special needs dentistry (also called special care dentistry)- Oral Biology- Forensic odontology- Geriatric dentistry or Geriodontics- Preventive and Social Medicine (Public health)- Our journal appreciates research articles pertaining with advancement of dentistry, preventive and community dentistry including oral epidemiology, oral health services research, oral health education and promotion, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, dental jurisprudence, ethics and oral health, economics, and quality assessment, recent advances in preventive dentistry and community dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Tobacco Vendor Perspectives on Tobacco Vendor Licensing in Lucknow, India: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study. Patient and Operator Experiences with Conventional Rubber Dam and OptiDam: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Impact of Hyaluronic Acid Around Dental Implants: A Systematic Review. Oral Health Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors of Undergraduate Students Enrolled in the Faculty of Dental Medicine at the Lebanese University. Comparative Study of Microabrasion and Resin Infiltration on Enamel Color Stability and Surface Characteristics: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1