A new, simplified endoscopic scoring system for predicting clinical outcome in gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia: the “e-cout system”

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Neoplasia Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.neo.2024.101030
{"title":"A new, simplified endoscopic scoring system for predicting clinical outcome in gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia: the “e-cout system”","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neo.2024.101030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><p>The clinical outcomes of gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) exhibit significant diversity, and the current reliance on endoscopic biopsy for diagnosis poses limitations in devising appropriate treatment strategies for this disease. This study aims to establish a prognostic prediction scoring system (e-Cout system) for gastric LGIN, offering a theoretical foundation for solving this clinical challenge.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospectively selecting 1013 cases meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria from over 300,000 cases of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed at the Digestive Endoscopy Center of our hospital between 2000 and 2022, the cohort included 484 cases as development cohort and 529 cases for validation. Employing relevant statistical analysis, we used development cohort data to establish the e-Cout system for gastric LGIN, and further used validation cohort data to for internal validation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the developmental stage, based on accordant regression coefficients, we assigned point values to six risk factors for poor prognosis: 4 points for microvessel (MV) distortion, 3 points for MV thickening, 2 points for ulcer, and 1 point each for lesion size &gt; 2cm, disease duration &gt; 1 year, and hyperemia and redness on the lesion surface. Patients were then categorized into four risk levels: low risk (0-1 point), medium risk (2-3), high risk (4-6), and very high risk (≥7). During the validation stage, significant differences in the three different outcomes of gastric LGIN were observed across all risk levels. The probability of reversal and progression showed a significant decrease and increase, respectively, with escalating of risk levels, and these differences were statistically significant (<em>P&lt;</em> 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The proposed e-Cout system holds promise in aiding clinicians to predict the probability and risk levels of different clinical outcomes in patients with gastric LGIN. This system is expected to provide an improved foundation and guidance for the selection of clinical strategies for this disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18917,"journal":{"name":"Neoplasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476558624000721/pdfft?md5=d52f55fec0863fd090be211152f2a941&pid=1-s2.0-S1476558624000721-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neoplasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476558624000721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

The clinical outcomes of gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) exhibit significant diversity, and the current reliance on endoscopic biopsy for diagnosis poses limitations in devising appropriate treatment strategies for this disease. This study aims to establish a prognostic prediction scoring system (e-Cout system) for gastric LGIN, offering a theoretical foundation for solving this clinical challenge.

Methods

Retrospectively selecting 1013 cases meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria from over 300,000 cases of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed at the Digestive Endoscopy Center of our hospital between 2000 and 2022, the cohort included 484 cases as development cohort and 529 cases for validation. Employing relevant statistical analysis, we used development cohort data to establish the e-Cout system for gastric LGIN, and further used validation cohort data to for internal validation.

Results

In the developmental stage, based on accordant regression coefficients, we assigned point values to six risk factors for poor prognosis: 4 points for microvessel (MV) distortion, 3 points for MV thickening, 2 points for ulcer, and 1 point each for lesion size > 2cm, disease duration > 1 year, and hyperemia and redness on the lesion surface. Patients were then categorized into four risk levels: low risk (0-1 point), medium risk (2-3), high risk (4-6), and very high risk (≥7). During the validation stage, significant differences in the three different outcomes of gastric LGIN were observed across all risk levels. The probability of reversal and progression showed a significant decrease and increase, respectively, with escalating of risk levels, and these differences were statistically significant (P< 0.001).

Conclusions

The proposed e-Cout system holds promise in aiding clinicians to predict the probability and risk levels of different clinical outcomes in patients with gastric LGIN. This system is expected to provide an improved foundation and guidance for the selection of clinical strategies for this disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测胃低级别上皮内瘤变临床结果的新型简化内镜评分系统:"e-cout 系统"。
背景和目的:胃低级别上皮内瘤变(LGIN)的临床结果呈现出显著的多样性,而目前对内镜活检诊断的依赖为该疾病制定适当的治疗策略带来了局限性。本研究旨在建立胃LGIN预后预测评分系统(e-Cout系统),为解决这一临床难题提供理论基础:回顾性地从我院消化内镜中心2000年至2022年间进行的30多万例上消化道内镜检查中筛选出1013例符合纳入和排除标准的病例,其中484例作为发展队列,529例作为验证队列。通过相关统计分析,我们利用开发队列数据建立了胃LGIN的e-Cout系统,并进一步利用验证队列数据进行了内部验证:在开发阶段,根据相关回归系数,我们为六个预后不良的风险因素分配了分值:微血管(MV)扭曲 4 分,MV 增厚 3 分,溃疡 2 分,病变大小 > 2cm、病程 > 1 年、病变表面充血和发红各 1 分。然后将患者分为四个风险等级:低风险(0-1 分)、中风险(2-3 分)、高风险(4-6 分)和极高风险(≥7 分)。在验证阶段,所有风险等级的胃 LGIN 的三种不同结果均存在显著差异。随着风险等级的升高,逆转和进展的概率分别出现了显著下降和上升,这些差异具有统计学意义(P< 0.001):结论:拟议中的 e-Cout 系统有望帮助临床医生预测胃 LGIN 患者不同临床结局的概率和风险水平。该系统有望为该疾病临床策略的选择提供更好的基础和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neoplasia
Neoplasia 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
82
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Neoplasia publishes the results of novel investigations in all areas of oncology research. The title Neoplasia was chosen to convey the journal’s breadth, which encompasses the traditional disciplines of cancer research as well as emerging fields and interdisciplinary investigations. Neoplasia is interested in studies describing new molecular and genetic findings relating to the neoplastic phenotype and in laboratory and clinical studies demonstrating creative applications of advances in the basic sciences to risk assessment, prognostic indications, detection, diagnosis, and treatment. In addition to regular Research Reports, Neoplasia also publishes Reviews and Meeting Reports. Neoplasia is committed to ensuring a thorough, fair, and rapid review and publication schedule to further its mission of serving both the scientific and clinical communities by disseminating important data and ideas in cancer research.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and genetic profile of Chinese patients with indolent natural killer-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract Oncolytic adenovirus MEM-288 encoding membrane-stable CD40L and IFNβ induces an anti-tumor immune response in high grade serous ovarian cancer Probing the glioma micro-environment: Analysis using biopsy in combination with ultra-fast cyclic immunolabeling ELAVL1 regulates PD-L1 mRNA stability to disrupt the infiltration of CD4-positive T cells in prostate cancer Unveiling the impact of SUMOylation at K298 site of heat shock factor 1 on glioblastoma malignant progression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1