Salvage Radiotherapy for Loco-Regional Recurrence of Esophageal Cancer Following Surgery.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.4143/crt.2024.191
Won Kyung Cho, Jae Myoung Noh, Dongryul Oh, Yong Chan Ahn, Jong-Mu Sun, Hong Kwan Kim, Young Mog Shim
{"title":"Salvage Radiotherapy for Loco-Regional Recurrence of Esophageal Cancer Following Surgery.","authors":"Won Kyung Cho, Jae Myoung Noh, Dongryul Oh, Yong Chan Ahn, Jong-Mu Sun, Hong Kwan Kim, Young Mog Shim","doi":"10.4143/crt.2024.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is few evidence regarding the optimal salvage treatment options for loco-reginal recurrence of esophageal cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of salvage radiotherapy (RT) in patients with loco-regional recurrence (LRR) after surgery for esophageal cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 147 esophageal cancer patients who received salvage RT for loco-regional recurrence between 1996 and December 2019. A total dose of 60 Gy in 20 fractions was used for RT alone and 60-70 Gy in 30-35 fractions for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients' median age was 65 (41-86). The median disease-free interval (DFI) was 13.5 months (1.0 to 97.4 months). After a median 18.8 months follow-up, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 38.1% and 25.9%, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 18.8 and 8.4 months, respectively. The CCRT could not improve OS compared to RT (p=0.336), but there was a trend of better PFS in the CCRT group. Regarding toxicities, the rate of grade 3 or higher toxicity was 10.9% occurring in 16 patients, and it was higher in patients who received CCRT than in the RT alone group (19.6% vs. 6.3%, p=0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Salvage RT alone as well as CCRT could be effective in patients with locoregionally recurrent esophageal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":49094,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is few evidence regarding the optimal salvage treatment options for loco-reginal recurrence of esophageal cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of salvage radiotherapy (RT) in patients with loco-regional recurrence (LRR) after surgery for esophageal cancer.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 147 esophageal cancer patients who received salvage RT for loco-regional recurrence between 1996 and December 2019. A total dose of 60 Gy in 20 fractions was used for RT alone and 60-70 Gy in 30-35 fractions for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

Results: The patients' median age was 65 (41-86). The median disease-free interval (DFI) was 13.5 months (1.0 to 97.4 months). After a median 18.8 months follow-up, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 38.1% and 25.9%, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 18.8 and 8.4 months, respectively. The CCRT could not improve OS compared to RT (p=0.336), but there was a trend of better PFS in the CCRT group. Regarding toxicities, the rate of grade 3 or higher toxicity was 10.9% occurring in 16 patients, and it was higher in patients who received CCRT than in the RT alone group (19.6% vs. 6.3%, p=0.023).

Conclusion: Salvage RT alone as well as CCRT could be effective in patients with locoregionally recurrent esophageal cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食管癌术后局部区域复发的挽救性放射治疗
目的:有关食管癌局部区域复发的最佳挽救治疗方案的证据很少。本研究旨在评估食管癌术后局部区域复发(LRR)患者接受挽救性放疗(RT)的临床疗效:我们回顾性研究了1996年至2019年12月期间因局部区域复发而接受挽救性RT治疗的147例食管癌患者。单独 RT 的总剂量为 60 Gy,分 20 次进行;同期化放疗(CCRT)的总剂量为 60-70 Gy,分 30-35 次进行:患者的中位年龄为65岁(41-86岁)。中位无病间隔期(DFI)为13.5个月(1.0至97.4个月)。经过中位18.8个月的随访,2年总生存率(OS)和无进展生存率(PFS)分别为38.1%和25.9%。中位 OS 和 PFS 分别为 18.8 个月和 8.4 个月。与RT相比,CCRT不能改善OS(P=0.336),但CCRT组的PFS有更好的趋势。在毒性方面,16名患者中出现3级或以上毒性的比例为10.9%,接受CCRT治疗的患者中出现3级或以上毒性的比例高于单纯RT组(19.6% vs. 6.3%,P=0.023):结论:单纯抢救性 RT 和 CCRT 对局部区域复发性食管癌患者均有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
126
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed open access publication of the Korean Cancer Association. It is published quarterly, one volume per year. Abbreviated title is Cancer Res Treat. It accepts manuscripts relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research. Subjects include carcinogenesis, tumor biology, molecular oncology, cancer genetics, tumor immunology, epidemiology, predictive markers and cancer prevention, pathology, cancer diagnosis, screening and therapies including chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, multimodality treatment and palliative care.
期刊最新文献
The Era of Antibody Drug Conjugates in Lung Cancer: Trick or Threat? Evaluating the Effects of Mindfulness-Based Self-Help via an OTT Platform on Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy: A Prospective Non-Randomized Controlled Trial. Estimation of Population Attributable Fraction by Hormone and Reproductive Factors on Female Cancer in the Republic of Korea, 2015 to 2030. Machine Learning-Based Prognostic Gene Signature for Early Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Association of Pro-inflammatory Cytokines with Gastric Cancer Risk: A Case-Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1