Cepstral Analysis of Voice in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1177/00034894241264938
Parizad Jamshidpour, Negin Moradi, Shahrokh Raiesian, Mohammad Jafar Shaterzadeh Yazdi, Majid Soltani, Maryam Seyedtabib, Mahdis Masoudrad, Mandana Nourbakhsh
{"title":"Cepstral Analysis of Voice in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders.","authors":"Parizad Jamshidpour, Negin Moradi, Shahrokh Raiesian, Mohammad Jafar Shaterzadeh Yazdi, Majid Soltani, Maryam Seyedtabib, Mahdis Masoudrad, Mandana Nourbakhsh","doi":"10.1177/00034894241264938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the voice quality of patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) compared with healthy subjects using cepstral analysis and investigate the relationship between the TMD severity and the values of cepstral analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects who met the inclusion criteria completed a general health questionnaire and the Fonseca Anamnestic Index. Patients who had TMDs with FAI were subjected to an examination based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. The final sample included 65 subjects, 31 TMDs patients (with a mean age ± standard deviation of 36.64 ± 13.67 years), and 34 healthy individuals in the control group (with a mean age ± standard deviation of 30.35 ± 7.78 years). Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) and Smoothened Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS) of a sustained vowel and connected speech were computed using Praat software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TMD patients indicated lower cepstral values and lower voice quality compared to the control group. Significant differences were found between TMD and control groups for all cepstral parameters (<i>P</i> < .001) and cepstral measurements showed a moderate to strong negative correlation with TMD severity (<i>P</i> < .001, rho =<i> -</i>0.57 to <i>-</i>0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The outcomes of the present study indicate that cepstral analysis can accurately distinguish the reduced voice quality of TMD patients from normal voice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241264938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the voice quality of patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) compared with healthy subjects using cepstral analysis and investigate the relationship between the TMD severity and the values of cepstral analysis.

Methods: Subjects who met the inclusion criteria completed a general health questionnaire and the Fonseca Anamnestic Index. Patients who had TMDs with FAI were subjected to an examination based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. The final sample included 65 subjects, 31 TMDs patients (with a mean age ± standard deviation of 36.64 ± 13.67 years), and 34 healthy individuals in the control group (with a mean age ± standard deviation of 30.35 ± 7.78 years). Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) and Smoothened Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS) of a sustained vowel and connected speech were computed using Praat software.

Results: TMD patients indicated lower cepstral values and lower voice quality compared to the control group. Significant differences were found between TMD and control groups for all cepstral parameters (P < .001) and cepstral measurements showed a moderate to strong negative correlation with TMD severity (P < .001, rho = -0.57 to -0.88).

Conclusion: The outcomes of the present study indicate that cepstral analysis can accurately distinguish the reduced voice quality of TMD patients from normal voice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颞下颌关节紊乱患者嗓音的倒频谱分析
研究目的本研究旨在利用头频谱分析法评估颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMD)患者与健康受试者的嗓音质量,并研究 TMD 严重程度与头频谱分析值之间的关系:符合纳入标准的受试者填写了一份普通健康问卷和丰塞卡家访指数。根据颞下颌关节紊乱诊断标准,对患有 TMD 并伴有 FAI 的患者进行了检查。最终样本包括 65 名受试者,其中 TMDs 患者 31 人(平均年龄(标准差)为 36.64 ± 13.67 岁),对照组健康人 34 人(平均年龄(标准差)为 30.35 ± 7.78 岁)。使用 Praat 软件计算了持续元音和连接语音的epstral Peak Prominence (CPP) 和 Smoothened Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS):与对照组相比,TMD 患者的epstral值较低,语音质量也较差。TMD 组和对照组在所有epstral参数上均存在显著差异(P P -0.57 至 -0.88):本研究结果表明,epstral 分析可准确区分 TMD 患者与正常嗓音之间的嗓音质量差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Surgical Characteristics and Adverse Events of an Active, Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Device. Management of a Piriform Sinus Fistula With Chronic Neck Infection in an Adult. Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis Rhinology Complications: A Rare Presentation. Clarifying the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Uncomplicated Pediatric Mastoiditis. Comparative Analysis of Nebulized Versus Intravenous Fentanyl for Pain Control After Tonsillectomy: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1