Role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in T4b esophageal cancer management: a systematic review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Diseases of the Esophagus Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1093/dote/doae058
Dimitrios Papaconstantinou, Nikolaos Koliakos, Andrianos-Serafeim Tzortzis, Nikolaos Mandrakas, Anargyros Bakopoulos, Georgios D Lianos, Michail Peroulis, Dimitrios Schizas
{"title":"Role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in T4b esophageal cancer management: a systematic review.","authors":"Dimitrios Papaconstantinou, Nikolaos Koliakos, Andrianos-Serafeim Tzortzis, Nikolaos Mandrakas, Anargyros Bakopoulos, Georgios D Lianos, Michail Peroulis, Dimitrios Schizas","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The incidence of T4b esophageal cancer with aortic invasion but without distant metastasis is estimated to be between 3.8% and 4.6% of all esophageal cancer cases. Development of an aortoesophageal fistula in such cases is a rare but not unlikely event, leading to catastrophic consequences. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the importance of aortic stenting (Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair-TEVAR) and its optimal timing in the management of locally advanced esophageal cancer. A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was undertaken to identify relevant studies published up to March 2024. An individual patient data analysis was performed by forming a patient cohort with elective and salvage TEVAR subgroups, depending on the timing of the stenting. The study pool consisted of 25 studies incorporating 101 cases of locally advanced esophageal cancer, with a median age of 64 years (range 45-87 years). Of them, 50 patients underwent elective TEVAR compared with 51 patients receiving TEVAR in an acute salvage setting. Elective or prophylactic TEVAR was found to significantly increase esophageal resection rates (65.6% vs. 16.7% in the salvage subgroup, P < 0.001), concurrently reducing complication rates (8.3% vs. 36.1%, P < 0.001). Overall survival was also prolonged in the elective subgroup (8.3 vs. 4 months, P = 0.001), with elective stenting being the only independent predictor of improved survival. In conclusion, management with aortic stenting in high-risk patients may reduce the catastrophic consequences of massive bleeding, minimize complications, and enhance survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incidence of T4b esophageal cancer with aortic invasion but without distant metastasis is estimated to be between 3.8% and 4.6% of all esophageal cancer cases. Development of an aortoesophageal fistula in such cases is a rare but not unlikely event, leading to catastrophic consequences. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the importance of aortic stenting (Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair-TEVAR) and its optimal timing in the management of locally advanced esophageal cancer. A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was undertaken to identify relevant studies published up to March 2024. An individual patient data analysis was performed by forming a patient cohort with elective and salvage TEVAR subgroups, depending on the timing of the stenting. The study pool consisted of 25 studies incorporating 101 cases of locally advanced esophageal cancer, with a median age of 64 years (range 45-87 years). Of them, 50 patients underwent elective TEVAR compared with 51 patients receiving TEVAR in an acute salvage setting. Elective or prophylactic TEVAR was found to significantly increase esophageal resection rates (65.6% vs. 16.7% in the salvage subgroup, P < 0.001), concurrently reducing complication rates (8.3% vs. 36.1%, P < 0.001). Overall survival was also prolonged in the elective subgroup (8.3 vs. 4 months, P = 0.001), with elective stenting being the only independent predictor of improved survival. In conclusion, management with aortic stenting in high-risk patients may reduce the catastrophic consequences of massive bleeding, minimize complications, and enhance survival rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腔内血管主动脉修补术在 T4b 食管癌治疗中的作用:系统性综述。
据估计,有主动脉侵犯但无远处转移的 T4b 级食管癌发病率占所有食管癌病例的 3.8% 至 4.6%。在这种情况下出现主动脉食管瘘是罕见的,但并非不可能,会导致灾难性后果。本系统性综述旨在评估主动脉支架植入术(胸腔内血管主动脉修复术-TEVAR)的重要性及其在局部晚期食管癌治疗中的最佳时机。我们对 MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 数据库进行了系统性文献检索,以确定截至 2024 年 3 月发表的相关研究。根据支架植入的时机,将患者分为选择性和挽救性 TEVAR 亚组,从而进行了单个患者数据分析。研究资料库由 25 项研究组成,纳入了 101 例局部晚期食管癌患者,中位年龄为 64 岁(范围为 45-87 岁)。其中,50 名患者接受了选择性 TEVAR,51 名患者在急性抢救情况下接受了 TEVAR。研究发现,选择性或预防性 TEVAR 可显著提高食管切除率(抢救亚组为 65.6% 对 16.7%,P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
期刊最新文献
High prevalence of esophageal motility disorders in patients with rheumatologic diseases. Sling fiber preservation during POEM reduces incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms. Impacts of intestinal fermentation on gastroesophageal reflux disease: can the tail wag the dog? Central ligation or partial preservation of the right gastric artery does not seem to affect conduit or anastomotic perfusion during robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Risk factors for readmission following esophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1