Leonardo M Santos, Amy Lang, Redha Wahidi, Andrew Bonacci, Sashank Gautam, Jacob Parsons
{"title":"The effect of shortfin mako shark skin at the reattachment of a separated turbulent boundary layer.","authors":"Leonardo M Santos, Amy Lang, Redha Wahidi, Andrew Bonacci, Sashank Gautam, Jacob Parsons","doi":"10.1088/1748-3190/ad679c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This smooth flat experimental study investigates the capability of mako shark scales to control flow separation when placed downstream of the onset of turbulent boundary layer separation and within the reattachment region. The objective of the study is to validate the hypothesis that the shark scales' bristling and recoiling would prevent the flow separation on the flank region (the fastest flow region) of the shark. A rotating cylinder was used to induce an adverse pressure gradient over a flat plate to produce a region of separated flow where the shark skin specimen was mounted. Two types of mako shark scales (flank (B2) and between flank and dorsal fin (B1)) were positioned in the preferred flow direction on a flat plate. The B2 scales are slender, 200<i>μ</i>m tall, and can bristle up to 50°. In contrast, B1 scales are wider, shorter, and can bristle at 30°. The bristling angle and shape are the main mechanisms by which the scales act to inhibit flow from moving upstream near the wall. Thus, the difference in the bristling angles and structures of the scales is attributed to the fact that the B2 scales function in a thicker boundary layer (behind the shark's gills) where they must bristle sufficiently high into the boundary layer to control the flow separation, and because the adverse pressure gradient in this region is higher where flow separation is more likely. The scales are placed in the reattachment region to elucidate their ability to control and reattach an already separated turbulent flow. The results show that B2 scales placed in the reattachment region reduce the size of the turbulent separation bubble and decrease the turbulent kinetic energy, while B1 scales have the opposite effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":55377,"journal":{"name":"Bioinspiration & Biomimetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinspiration & Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ad679c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This smooth flat experimental study investigates the capability of mako shark scales to control flow separation when placed downstream of the onset of turbulent boundary layer separation and within the reattachment region. The objective of the study is to validate the hypothesis that the shark scales' bristling and recoiling would prevent the flow separation on the flank region (the fastest flow region) of the shark. A rotating cylinder was used to induce an adverse pressure gradient over a flat plate to produce a region of separated flow where the shark skin specimen was mounted. Two types of mako shark scales (flank (B2) and between flank and dorsal fin (B1)) were positioned in the preferred flow direction on a flat plate. The B2 scales are slender, 200μm tall, and can bristle up to 50°. In contrast, B1 scales are wider, shorter, and can bristle at 30°. The bristling angle and shape are the main mechanisms by which the scales act to inhibit flow from moving upstream near the wall. Thus, the difference in the bristling angles and structures of the scales is attributed to the fact that the B2 scales function in a thicker boundary layer (behind the shark's gills) where they must bristle sufficiently high into the boundary layer to control the flow separation, and because the adverse pressure gradient in this region is higher where flow separation is more likely. The scales are placed in the reattachment region to elucidate their ability to control and reattach an already separated turbulent flow. The results show that B2 scales placed in the reattachment region reduce the size of the turbulent separation bubble and decrease the turbulent kinetic energy, while B1 scales have the opposite effect.
期刊介绍:
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics publishes research involving the study and distillation of principles and functions found in biological systems that have been developed through evolution, and application of this knowledge to produce novel and exciting basic technologies and new approaches to solving scientific problems. It provides a forum for interdisciplinary research which acts as a pipeline, facilitating the two-way flow of ideas and understanding between the extensive bodies of knowledge of the different disciplines. It has two principal aims: to draw on biology to enrich engineering and to draw from engineering to enrich biology.
The journal aims to include input from across all intersecting areas of both fields. In biology, this would include work in all fields from physiology to ecology, with either zoological or botanical focus. In engineering, this would include both design and practical application of biomimetic or bioinspired devices and systems. Typical areas of interest include:
Systems, designs and structure
Communication and navigation
Cooperative behaviour
Self-organizing biological systems
Self-healing and self-assembly
Aerial locomotion and aerospace applications of biomimetics
Biomorphic surface and subsurface systems
Marine dynamics: swimming and underwater dynamics
Applications of novel materials
Biomechanics; including movement, locomotion, fluidics
Cellular behaviour
Sensors and senses
Biomimetic or bioinformed approaches to geological exploration.