Breaking the period product insecurity cycle: An observational study of outcomes experienced by recipients of free period products in the United States.

Kelley Ec Massengale, Kelsey M Bowman, Lynn H Comer, Susan Van Ness
{"title":"Breaking the period product insecurity cycle: An observational study of outcomes experienced by recipients of free period products in the United States.","authors":"Kelley Ec Massengale, Kelsey M Bowman, Lynn H Comer, Susan Van Ness","doi":"10.1177/17455057241267104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The United States is increasingly recognizing period product insecurity, insufficient access to menstrual products and limited private spaces for managing menstruation due to financial constraints, as an issue impacting the well-being and dignity of Americans. One strategy to address period product insecurity has been distributing free period products via period supply banks. The outcomes of period product distribution outside the school setting are absent from the literature.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study, a formative evaluation of the free period product distribution efforts of the Alliance for Period Supplies, aims to identify (1) characteristics of individuals receiving products from period supply banks and their experiences of period product insecurity and (2) health and social outcomes experienced by recipients of free period products.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey data collection occurred at two points: baseline and one-year follow-up. All study participants provided verbal consent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between Fall 2018 and Spring 2020, 1863 baseline and 80 follow-up surveys were administered. Participants received free period products for themselves and/or a household member from one of 20 participating Alliance for Period Supplies period supply banks directly or from one of their 64 partner agencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, 72.4% of participants had to choose between buying period products and another basic need. One year after accessing a period supply bank, 36.3% of participants reported this experience (<i>p</i> = 0.018). Participants reported at baseline, on average, 7.8 days in the past year of avoiding seeing others, canceling appointments, or skipping work or school because they did not have access to period products. At follow-up, this was reduced to 1.2 days, on average, <i>t</i>(68) = 2.214, <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Period supply banks play an essential role in facilitating access to period products and the resulting benefits. Our study highlights the need for sustainable, well-funded policies and interventions to address period product insecurity effectively in society.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"20 ","pages":"17455057241267104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11273700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241267104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The United States is increasingly recognizing period product insecurity, insufficient access to menstrual products and limited private spaces for managing menstruation due to financial constraints, as an issue impacting the well-being and dignity of Americans. One strategy to address period product insecurity has been distributing free period products via period supply banks. The outcomes of period product distribution outside the school setting are absent from the literature.

Objectives: This study, a formative evaluation of the free period product distribution efforts of the Alliance for Period Supplies, aims to identify (1) characteristics of individuals receiving products from period supply banks and their experiences of period product insecurity and (2) health and social outcomes experienced by recipients of free period products.

Design: Survey data collection occurred at two points: baseline and one-year follow-up. All study participants provided verbal consent.

Methods: Between Fall 2018 and Spring 2020, 1863 baseline and 80 follow-up surveys were administered. Participants received free period products for themselves and/or a household member from one of 20 participating Alliance for Period Supplies period supply banks directly or from one of their 64 partner agencies.

Results: At baseline, 72.4% of participants had to choose between buying period products and another basic need. One year after accessing a period supply bank, 36.3% of participants reported this experience (p = 0.018). Participants reported at baseline, on average, 7.8 days in the past year of avoiding seeing others, canceling appointments, or skipping work or school because they did not have access to period products. At follow-up, this was reduced to 1.2 days, on average, t(68) = 2.214, p < 0.05.

Conclusion: Period supply banks play an essential role in facilitating access to period products and the resulting benefits. Our study highlights the need for sustainable, well-funded policies and interventions to address period product insecurity effectively in society.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打破月经产品无保障的循环:对美国免费月经产品接受者经历的结果进行观察研究。
背景:美国越来越认识到,月经用品不安全、月经用品供应不足以及因经济拮据而导致管理月经的私人空间有限,是影响美国人福祉和尊严的一个问题。解决月经用品不安全问题的策略之一是通过月经用品银行免费发放月经用品。关于在学校外发放月经用品的结果,目前还没有相关文献:本研究是对 "生理期用品联盟"(Alliance for Period Supplies)免费发放生理期用品工作的形成性评估,旨在确定(1)从生理期用品银行领取用品的个人的特征及其生理期用品不安全的经历,以及(2)免费生理期用品领取者所经历的健康和社会结果:设计:在基线和一年随访两个时间点收集调查数据。所有研究参与者均口头同意:在 2018 年秋季至 2020 年春季期间,共进行了 1863 次基线调查和 80 次随访调查。参与者从 20 个参与的生理期用品联盟(Alliance for Period Supplies)的生理期用品库中的一个直接或从其 64 个合作机构中的一个为自己和/或一名家庭成员免费领取生理期用品:基线调查显示,72.4% 的参与者必须在购买生理期用品和其他基本需求之间做出选择。在使用经期用品银行一年后,36.3% 的参与者报告了这种经历(p = 0.018)。在基线期,参与者平均有 7.8 天因为买不到月经用品而避免与他人见面、取消约会、旷工或逃学。在跟踪调查中,平均天数减少到了 1.2 天,t(68) = 2.214,p 结论:月经用品供应银行在促进人们使用月经用品并从中受益方面发挥着重要作用。我们的研究突出表明,需要制定可持续的、资金充足的政策和干预措施,以有效解决社会中月经产品不安全的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physical violence and its associations: Insights from nationally representative data in India. Unlocking breast cancer in Brazilian public health system: Using tissue microarray for accurate immunohistochemical evaluation with limitations in subtyping. Adapting and validating the satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, and duration-breast cancer (SATED-BC) scale for measuring sleep health in Spanish women treated for breast cancer. "Listening to understand," exploring postpartum women's perceptions of their social networks and social support in relation to their health behaviors and weight: A qualitative exploratory study. Evaluation of mental disorder related to colposcopy procedure during the COVID period: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1