An algorithm for the surgical approach to spontaneous temporal bone CSF leak

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY American Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104411
{"title":"An algorithm for the surgical approach to spontaneous temporal bone CSF leak","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To suggest a comprehensive algorithm for the surgical approach for correcting of sources of temporal bone CSF leaks.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A case series for patients operated in a single academic tertiary referral center between 2011 and 4.2022. Included in the study were 46 patients, 5 of whom had a bilateral problem, resulting in 51 pathologic temporal bones. The presentation was an active CSF leak (38 patients) or bacterial otogenic meningitis (8 patients). Follow up ranged from 8 months to 5 years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 42 ears operated via the default middle fossa approach, 37 were successful (88 %) in controlling CSF leak. None had intracranial complications or sensorineural hearing loss. Location, number and size of the defects, hearing status, associated superior semicircular canal dehiscence, additional intra-temporal or intra-cranial pathologies may indicate a transmastoid approach. Of the six ears that had a canal wall up mastoidectomy as a primary procedure, one required revision due to ongoing CSF leak. Five revision cases and three primary cases were effectively sealed with a subtotal petrosectomy and obliteration. One was lost to follow-up. Hearing was reconstructed with bone-anchored hearing implants in 6 out of these 8 ears.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The middle fossa approach could be used as a default approach for sealing TD. There are a number of indications for transmastoid approaches in both primary and revision cases. Obliteration of the ear was used in all revision cases. The suggested algorithm can help in planning surgery for temporal bone CSF leaks or a history of otogenic meningitis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924001972","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To suggest a comprehensive algorithm for the surgical approach for correcting of sources of temporal bone CSF leaks.

Methods

A case series for patients operated in a single academic tertiary referral center between 2011 and 4.2022. Included in the study were 46 patients, 5 of whom had a bilateral problem, resulting in 51 pathologic temporal bones. The presentation was an active CSF leak (38 patients) or bacterial otogenic meningitis (8 patients). Follow up ranged from 8 months to 5 years.

Results

Of the 42 ears operated via the default middle fossa approach, 37 were successful (88 %) in controlling CSF leak. None had intracranial complications or sensorineural hearing loss. Location, number and size of the defects, hearing status, associated superior semicircular canal dehiscence, additional intra-temporal or intra-cranial pathologies may indicate a transmastoid approach. Of the six ears that had a canal wall up mastoidectomy as a primary procedure, one required revision due to ongoing CSF leak. Five revision cases and three primary cases were effectively sealed with a subtotal petrosectomy and obliteration. One was lost to follow-up. Hearing was reconstructed with bone-anchored hearing implants in 6 out of these 8 ears.

Conclusions

The middle fossa approach could be used as a default approach for sealing TD. There are a number of indications for transmastoid approaches in both primary and revision cases. Obliteration of the ear was used in all revision cases. The suggested algorithm can help in planning surgery for temporal bone CSF leaks or a history of otogenic meningitis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自发性颞骨脑脊液漏的手术方法算法。
目的为纠正颞骨 CSF 漏源的手术方法提出一种综合算法:对 2011 年至 2022 年期间在一家学术性三级转诊中心接受手术的患者进行病例系列研究。研究包括 46 例患者,其中 5 例为双侧患者,导致 51 例颞骨病变。表现为活动性脑脊液漏(38 名患者)或细菌性耳源性脑膜炎(8 名患者)。随访时间从 8 个月到 5 年不等:结果:在通过默认中窝方法进行手术的 42 耳中,37 耳(88%)成功控制了 CSF 渗漏。无一例出现颅内并发症或感音神经性听力损失。缺损的位置、数量和大小、听力状况、相关的上半规管开裂、颞内或颅内的其他病变都可能表明需要采用经鼻方法。在进行乳突上管壁切除术作为主要手术的六只耳朵中,有一只耳朵由于持续的 CSF 渗漏而需要进行翻修。五例翻修病例和三例初治病例通过乳突次全切除术和阻塞术得到了有效封闭。有一例失去了随访机会。在这8只耳朵中,有6只耳朵通过骨固定听力植入物重建了听力:结论:中窝入路可作为封闭 TD 的默认入路。结论:中窝入路可作为封堵 TD 的默认入路。在初治和复治病例中,经胸入路都有许多适应症。在所有翻修病例中都使用了耳廓封闭术。建议的算法有助于规划颞骨 CSF 漏或有耳源性脑膜炎病史的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
期刊最新文献
Neurogenic cough: A commentary on the step-up approach and therapeutic considerations A national survey of otolaryngologists' perspectives on uses and barriers to palliative care. Transoral non-robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma Improving readability and comprehension levels of otolaryngology patient education materials using ChatGPT Analysis of head and eye dynamic may explain saccades in dizzy patients with normal VOR gain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1