Assessment of ChatGPT generated educational material for head and neck surgery counseling

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY American Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104410
{"title":"Assessment of ChatGPT generated educational material for head and neck surgery counseling","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>ChatGPT is becoming very popular as an information source for the public. The adequacy of ChatGPT generated patient counseling material has not yet been extensively assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>ChatGPT was presented with perioperative counseling and complication questions regarding five different procedure, and accuracy of responses was assessed. The chat was then asked to present an explanation of each procedure, and quality of the responses were compared to online educational material.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>ChatGPT responses were comprehensive when discussing counseling points commonly discussed by a provider prior to a procedure. Responses to questions on surgical complications were less accurate and comprehensive. In comparison to online educational material, ChatGPT scored at or above the median SAM and PEMAT scores for all procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ChatGPT did well addressing basic counseling points during the perioperative period, although it did not perform as well when addressing surgical complications. Chat response quality was comparable to currently available online educational material.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924001960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

ChatGPT is becoming very popular as an information source for the public. The adequacy of ChatGPT generated patient counseling material has not yet been extensively assessed.

Methods

ChatGPT was presented with perioperative counseling and complication questions regarding five different procedure, and accuracy of responses was assessed. The chat was then asked to present an explanation of each procedure, and quality of the responses were compared to online educational material.

Results

ChatGPT responses were comprehensive when discussing counseling points commonly discussed by a provider prior to a procedure. Responses to questions on surgical complications were less accurate and comprehensive. In comparison to online educational material, ChatGPT scored at or above the median SAM and PEMAT scores for all procedures.

Conclusions

ChatGPT did well addressing basic counseling points during the perioperative period, although it did not perform as well when addressing surgical complications. Chat response quality was comparable to currently available online educational material.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 ChatGPT 生成的头颈外科手术咨询教育材料进行评估。
背景:作为公众的信息来源,ChatGPT 越来越受欢迎。目前尚未对 ChatGPT 生成的患者咨询材料的充分性进行广泛评估:方法:向 ChatGPT 提出了有关五种不同手术的围手术期咨询和并发症问题,并对回答的准确性进行了评估。然后要求聊天者对每种手术进行解释,并将回答的质量与在线教育材料进行比较:结果:在讨论医疗服务提供者在手术前通常会讨论的咨询要点时,ChatGPT 的回答非常全面。对手术并发症问题的回答则不够准确和全面。与在线教材相比,ChatGPT 在所有手术中的得分都达到或超过了 SAM 和 PEMAT 分数的中位数:结论:ChatGPT 在解决围术期基本咨询要点方面表现良好,但在解决手术并发症方面表现不佳。聊天回复质量与目前可用的在线教育材料相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
期刊最新文献
Neurogenic cough: A commentary on the step-up approach and therapeutic considerations A national survey of otolaryngologists' perspectives on uses and barriers to palliative care. Transoral non-robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma Improving readability and comprehension levels of otolaryngology patient education materials using ChatGPT Analysis of head and eye dynamic may explain saccades in dizzy patients with normal VOR gain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1