Alliance A061202: ixazomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for patients with lenalidomide-refractory MM in first relapse.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Blood advances Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013623
Peter Voorhees, Vera Suman, Yvonne Efebera, Noopur Raje, Sascha Tuchman, Cesar Rodriguez, Jacob Laubach, Misty Bova-Solem, Destin Carlisle, Saad Usmani, Philip McCarthy, Paul G Richardson
{"title":"Alliance A061202: ixazomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for patients with lenalidomide-refractory MM in first relapse.","authors":"Peter Voorhees, Vera Suman, Yvonne Efebera, Noopur Raje, Sascha Tuchman, Cesar Rodriguez, Jacob Laubach, Misty Bova-Solem, Destin Carlisle, Saad Usmani, Philip McCarthy, Paul G Richardson","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Optimal therapy for the growing number of patients with lenalidomide (LEN)-refractory multiple myeloma in their first relapse remains poorly defined. We therefore undertook a randomized phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib (IXA) with pomalidomide (POM) and dexamethasone (DEX) in this patient population. The overall response rate (ORR) for POM-DEX was 43.6%, and for IXA-POM-DEX, it was 63.2%. The depth of response, measured by the attainment of at least a very good partial response, favored triplet therapy over doublet therapy (28.9% vs 5.1%; P = .0063). A preplanned interim analysis after 75% of the progression events had occurred demonstrated an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) that favored IXA-POM-DEX and that crossed the predefined boundary of superiority, leading to release of the study results. With additional follow-up, the median PFS for POM-DEX was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-13.6 months) vs 20.3 months for IXA-POM-DEX (95% CI, 7.7-26.0 months; hazard ratio, 0.437; upper 90% bound = 0.657). The ORR and median PFS for 26 of 30 eligible patients who crossed over from the doublet to the triplet therapy at disease progression was 23.1% and 5.6 months, respectively. Overall survival was similar between the 2 groups. More hematologic toxicities were seen with the triplet therapy, but nonhematologic adverse events were similar between the 2 arms. Our data support further testing of this all-oral triplet therapy in comparison with current standard triplet therapy in the context of phase 3 studies for patients with LEN-refractory disease at first relapse. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02004275.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013623","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Optimal therapy for the growing number of patients with lenalidomide (LEN)-refractory multiple myeloma in their first relapse remains poorly defined. We therefore undertook a randomized phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib (IXA) with pomalidomide (POM) and dexamethasone (DEX) in this patient population. The overall response rate (ORR) for POM-DEX was 43.6%, and for IXA-POM-DEX, it was 63.2%. The depth of response, measured by the attainment of at least a very good partial response, favored triplet therapy over doublet therapy (28.9% vs 5.1%; P = .0063). A preplanned interim analysis after 75% of the progression events had occurred demonstrated an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) that favored IXA-POM-DEX and that crossed the predefined boundary of superiority, leading to release of the study results. With additional follow-up, the median PFS for POM-DEX was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-13.6 months) vs 20.3 months for IXA-POM-DEX (95% CI, 7.7-26.0 months; hazard ratio, 0.437; upper 90% bound = 0.657). The ORR and median PFS for 26 of 30 eligible patients who crossed over from the doublet to the triplet therapy at disease progression was 23.1% and 5.6 months, respectively. Overall survival was similar between the 2 groups. More hematologic toxicities were seen with the triplet therapy, but nonhematologic adverse events were similar between the 2 arms. Our data support further testing of this all-oral triplet therapy in comparison with current standard triplet therapy in the context of phase 3 studies for patients with LEN-refractory disease at first relapse. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02004275.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联盟A061202:伊沙佐米、泊马度胺和地塞米松治疗来那度胺难治性多发性骨髓瘤首次复发。
来那度胺(LEN)难治性多发性骨髓瘤(MM)首次复发的患者越来越多,但其最佳治疗方法仍未明确。因此,我们开展了一项随机II期研究,评估口服蛋白酶体抑制剂伊沙佐米(IXA)与泊马度胺(POM)和地塞米松(DEX)联合治疗这类患者的疗效和安全性。POM-DEX的总反应率(ORR)为43.6%,IXA-POM-DEX为63.2%。以获得非常好的部分反应或更好的部分反应来衡量反应深度,三联疗法优于双联疗法,分别为28.9%对5.1%(P = 0.0063)。在75%的进展事件发生后进行的一项预先计划的中期分析显示,IXA-POM-DEX的无进展生存期(PFS)优势超过了预先确定的优越性界限,因此研究结果得以公布。随着随访时间的延长,POM-DEX 的中位无进展生存期为 7.5 个月(95% 置信区间 [CI] 4.8 - 13.6 个月),而 IXA-POM-DEX 为 20.3 个月(95% 置信区间 [CI] 7.7 - 26.0 个月,危险比为 0.437 [90% 上限 = 0.657])。30名符合条件的患者中有26名在病情进展时从双联疗法转为三联疗法,他们的ORR和中位PFS分别为23.1%和5.6个月。两组患者的总生存期相似。三联疗法的血液学毒性反应较多,但两组的非血液学不良反应相似。我们的数据支持在针对LEN难治性疾病首次复发患者的III期研究中进一步测试这种全口服三联疗法与当前标准三联疗法的对比。该试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 登记为 NCT02004275。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blood advances
Blood advances Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
840
期刊介绍: Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016. Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.
期刊最新文献
Liver-related aspects of valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene therapy for hemophilia A: expert guidance for clinical practice. A multicenter phase 2 clinical trial of low-dose subcutaneous decitabine in myelofibrosis. Antithrombotic efficacy and bleeding risks of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia treatments. In vivo silencing of intestinal DMT1 mitigates iron loading in β-thalassemia intermedia (Hbbth3/+) mice. Increased CCL2/CCR2 axis promotes tumor progression by increasing M2 macrophages in MYC/BCL2 double-expressor DLBCL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1