Assessment of the refractive outcomes of patients with regular corneal astigmatism implanted with high-power toric intraocular lenses.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1007/s00417-024-06586-8
Yannis Badri, Antoine Levron, Emilie Agard, Charles-Henry Remignon, Roman Chudzinski, Jeremy Billant, Hugo Bouvarel, Pierre Leroux, Ines Fenniri, Pierre Pradat, Corinne Dot
{"title":"Assessment of the refractive outcomes of patients with regular corneal astigmatism implanted with high-power toric intraocular lenses.","authors":"Yannis Badri, Antoine Levron, Emilie Agard, Charles-Henry Remignon, Roman Chudzinski, Jeremy Billant, Hugo Bouvarel, Pierre Leroux, Ines Fenniri, Pierre Pradat, Corinne Dot","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06586-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To describe the refractive outcomes of eyes with high regular corneal astigmatism undergoing age-related cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Astigmatic patients who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of high-power XY1AT HOYA<sup>®</sup> toric lenses (IOLs) (≥ T5) between March 2020 and June 2022 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of Total Corneal Astigmatism (TCA) used for the toric IOL calculation: group 1 = TCA<sup>TK- 700</sup> (TCA measured by the Iol Master 700<sup>®</sup>) and group 2 = TCA<sup>AK- 700</sup> (TCA estimated from the anterior keratometry of the Iol Master 700<sup>®</sup> and using the Abulafia-Koch regression). The best-uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, subjective spherical equivalent (SSEq) and subjective residual cylinder (SRC) were assessed at 1 month. The predictability (centroid [CEPA] and mean absolute error in predicted astigmatism [MAEPA]) of the 2 TCA assessment methods was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>96 eyes of 74 patients were included. In the whole cohort, the UDVA was 0.14 ± 0.19 logMAR, the CDVA was 0.04 ± 0.07 logMAR. Postoperative SSEq was - 0.24 ± 0.53D. Postoperative SRC was - 0.48 ± 0.56D. The UDVA, SSEq and SRC did not significantly differ between groups. The MAEPA was significantly better with TCA<sup>AK-700</sup> compared to TCA<sup>TK-700</sup>: 0.58 ± 0.52D versus 0.65 ± 0.55D (p = 0.01). No significant difference was observed for the CEPA (p(x) = 0.09, p(y) = 0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>XY1AT HOYA<sup>®</sup> toric IOLs are a very good alternative even in case of high toricity. Residual astigmatism predictability is high, it would be better with TCA<sup>AK- 700</sup>. This data should be confirmed with a larger sample of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"3915-3923"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06586-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To describe the refractive outcomes of eyes with high regular corneal astigmatism undergoing age-related cataract surgery.

Methods: Astigmatic patients who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of high-power XY1AT HOYA® toric lenses (IOLs) (≥ T5) between March 2020 and June 2022 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of Total Corneal Astigmatism (TCA) used for the toric IOL calculation: group 1 = TCATK- 700 (TCA measured by the Iol Master 700®) and group 2 = TCAAK- 700 (TCA estimated from the anterior keratometry of the Iol Master 700® and using the Abulafia-Koch regression). The best-uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, subjective spherical equivalent (SSEq) and subjective residual cylinder (SRC) were assessed at 1 month. The predictability (centroid [CEPA] and mean absolute error in predicted astigmatism [MAEPA]) of the 2 TCA assessment methods was analyzed.

Results: 96 eyes of 74 patients were included. In the whole cohort, the UDVA was 0.14 ± 0.19 logMAR, the CDVA was 0.04 ± 0.07 logMAR. Postoperative SSEq was - 0.24 ± 0.53D. Postoperative SRC was - 0.48 ± 0.56D. The UDVA, SSEq and SRC did not significantly differ between groups. The MAEPA was significantly better with TCAAK-700 compared to TCATK-700: 0.58 ± 0.52D versus 0.65 ± 0.55D (p = 0.01). No significant difference was observed for the CEPA (p(x) = 0.09, p(y) = 0.19).

Conclusions: XY1AT HOYA® toric IOLs are a very good alternative even in case of high toricity. Residual astigmatism predictability is high, it would be better with TCAAK- 700. This data should be confirmed with a larger sample of patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估常规角膜散光患者植入高倍散光眼内透镜后的屈光效果。
背景:目的目的:描述接受老年性白内障手术的高规则角膜散光眼的屈光疗效:纳入2020年3月至2022年6月期间接受白内障手术并植入高倍XY1AT HOYA®散光人工晶体(IOLs)(≥ T5)的散光患者。根据散光人工晶体计算所用的角膜总散光(TCA)类型,患者被分为两组:第一组 = TCATK- 700(TCA 由 Iol Master 700® 测得)和第二组 = TCAAK- 700(TCA 由 Iol Master 700® 的前角膜测量和 Abulafia-Koch 回归估算得出)。1 个月后评估最佳未校正(UDVA)和校正(CDVA)距离视力、主观球面等值(SSEq)和主观残余圆柱度(SRC)。分析了两种 TCA 评估方法的可预测性(散光预测中心误差 [CEPA] 和散光预测平均绝对误差 [MAEPA]):结果:共纳入了 74 名患者的 96 只眼睛。所有患者的 UDVA 为 0.14 ± 0.19 logMAR,CDVA 为 0.04 ± 0.07 logMAR。术后SSEq为- 0.24 ± 0.53D。术后 SRC 为 - 0.48 ± 0.56D。各组之间的 UDVA、SSEq 和 SRC 没有明显差异。与 TCATK-700 相比,TCAAK-700 的 MAEPA 明显更好:0.58 ± 0.52D 对 0.65 ± 0.55D (p = 0.01)。CEPA无明显差异(p(x) = 0.09,p(y) = 0.19):结论:XY1AT HOYA® 散光人工晶体即使在散光度数较高的情况下也是一种很好的选择。残余散光的可预测性很高,使用 TCAAK- 700 会更好。这一数据应在更多的患者样本中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
期刊最新文献
Reply on comments on the paper "Descemet's membrane transplantation for the treatment of recurrent high myopic macular hole associated with retinal detachment". Letter to the editor regarding "Descemet's membrane transplantation for the treatment of recurrent high myopic macular hole associated with retinal detachment". Acute intraocular pressure responses changes during dynamic resistance training in primary open-angle glaucoma patients and age-matched controls. Exploration of the cutoff values of axial length that is susceptible to develop advanced primary open angle glaucoma in patients aged less than 50 years. Anterior-Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Patients Undergoing Supraciliary Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1