The role of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for menstrual pain relief: A randomized control trial.

Bailey McLagan, Joshua Dexheimer, Nicole Strock, Shayna Goldstein, Stephanie Guzman, David Erceg, E Todd Schroeder
{"title":"The role of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for menstrual pain relief: A randomized control trial.","authors":"Bailey McLagan, Joshua Dexheimer, Nicole Strock, Shayna Goldstein, Stephanie Guzman, David Erceg, E Todd Schroeder","doi":"10.1177/17455057241266455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal pain due to menses (primary dysmenorrhea) is an extremely pervasive and debilitating symptom affecting up to 90% of menstruating individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this randomized control trial was to investigate the effect of a commercial transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation unit, Therabody PowerDot<sup>®</sup> (Therabody Inc., Los Angeles) on dysmenorrhea compared with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a randomized cross-over study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 47 participants agreed to participate in the study, with 34 completing it. Participants completed treatments across three consecutive menstrual cycles in randomized order: single-unit transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (Uno), dual unit transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (Duo), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (Control). Upon onset of dysmenorrhea, participants applied transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to their abdomen for a minimum of 30 min. Control participants were instructed to take non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as needed. Surveys were used to record pain before and after treatment. We hypothesized that the PowerDot would decrease self-reported pain scores, and decrease non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug consumption during menses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants experienced a statistically and clinically significant reduction in pain during the Control (-3.52 ± 1.9), Uno (-2.10 ± 1.6), and Duo (-2.19 ± 1.7) cycles (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs consumed during the Control cycle (3.5 ± 2.6), was significantly different as compared with that of Uno (1.5 ± 3.0), or Duo (1.1 ± 2.6) (<i>p</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of a commercial transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation unit results in significant decrease in pain. Although not as robust as the relief in pain induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the adverse events of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation are minimal in comparison. Therefore, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation appears to be a viable alternative to pain relief from dysmenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT05178589.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"20 ","pages":"17455057241266455"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241266455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Abdominal pain due to menses (primary dysmenorrhea) is an extremely pervasive and debilitating symptom affecting up to 90% of menstruating individuals.

Objective: The objective of this randomized control trial was to investigate the effect of a commercial transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation unit, Therabody PowerDot® (Therabody Inc., Los Angeles) on dysmenorrhea compared with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use.

Design: This was a randomized cross-over study.

Methods: A total of 47 participants agreed to participate in the study, with 34 completing it. Participants completed treatments across three consecutive menstrual cycles in randomized order: single-unit transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (Uno), dual unit transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (Duo), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (Control). Upon onset of dysmenorrhea, participants applied transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to their abdomen for a minimum of 30 min. Control participants were instructed to take non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as needed. Surveys were used to record pain before and after treatment. We hypothesized that the PowerDot would decrease self-reported pain scores, and decrease non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug consumption during menses.

Results: Participants experienced a statistically and clinically significant reduction in pain during the Control (-3.52 ± 1.9), Uno (-2.10 ± 1.6), and Duo (-2.19 ± 1.7) cycles (p < 0.001). The doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs consumed during the Control cycle (3.5 ± 2.6), was significantly different as compared with that of Uno (1.5 ± 3.0), or Duo (1.1 ± 2.6) (p = 0.004).

Conclusions: Use of a commercial transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation unit results in significant decrease in pain. Although not as robust as the relief in pain induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the adverse events of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation are minimal in comparison. Therefore, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation appears to be a viable alternative to pain relief from dysmenorrhea.

Clinical trial registration: NCT05178589.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮神经电刺激对缓解痛经的作用:随机对照试验。
背景:月经引起的腹痛(原发性痛经)是一种极为普遍且使人衰弱的症状,影响多达 90% 的月经期患者:本随机对照试验的目的是研究商用经皮神经电刺激装置 Therabody PowerDot® (Therabody 公司,洛杉矶)与使用非甾体类消炎药相比对痛经的影响:设计:这是一项随机交叉研究:共有 47 人同意参加研究,其中 34 人完成了研究。参与者按随机顺序在连续三个月经周期内完成治疗:单机经皮神经电刺激(Uno)、双机经皮神经电刺激(Duo)和使用非甾体抗炎药(对照组)。在出现痛经时,参与者对腹部进行至少 30 分钟的经皮神经电刺激。对照组受试者则被告知根据需要服用非类固醇消炎药。调查表用于记录治疗前后的疼痛情况。我们假设,PowerDot 可以降低自我报告的疼痛评分,并减少经期非甾体抗炎药物的消耗:结果:受试者在对照组(-3.52 ± 1.9)、Uno 组(-2.10 ± 1.6)和 Duo 组(-2.19 ± 1.7)周期内的疼痛均有统计学和临床意义上的显著减轻(P = 0.004):结论:使用商用经皮神经电刺激装置可显著减轻疼痛。虽然经皮神经电刺激对疼痛的缓解不如非甾体类消炎药那么明显,但相比之下,经皮神经电刺激的不良反应却微乎其微。因此,经皮神经电刺激似乎是缓解痛经疼痛的一种可行替代方法:临床试验注册:NCT05178589。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physical violence and its associations: Insights from nationally representative data in India. Unlocking breast cancer in Brazilian public health system: Using tissue microarray for accurate immunohistochemical evaluation with limitations in subtyping. Improving access, understanding, and dignity during miscarriage recovery in British Columbia, Canada: A patient-oriented research study. Common maternal health problems and their correlates in early post-partum mothers. Empowered management for pelvic pain: The experiences of women with persistent pelvic pain participating in an online self-directed self-management program while they wait for interprofessional care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1