Effect of sequential tasks in the case studies of business English textbooks on fostering critical thinking based on cognitive load theory

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL Learning and Motivation Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102027
Yun Jiang
{"title":"Effect of sequential tasks in the case studies of business English textbooks on fostering critical thinking based on cognitive load theory","authors":"Yun Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a consensus that case studies in Business English class are helpful to foster critical thinking, but little research has been done to explore how case studies facilitate it. To bridge the gap, the present study uses the revised Bloom’s taxonomy as a tool to qualitatively and quantitatively investigate the effect of case studies in <em>Market Leader</em> textbooks on fostering critical thinking based on cognitive load theory. First, the presence of six cognitive levels targeted in the tasks is examined to see how case studies sequence their tasks according to the increase of cognitive complexity. Secondly, the scaffoldings distributed across the sequential tasks are explored to investigate how well they impose appropriate amount of cognitive load on students. Although six cognitive levels are found, there is an inappropriate administration of task scaffolding in a single task or task chain, leading to insufficient or superficial scaffolds and thus inducing high level of cognitive load for students to develop critical thinking. Accordingly, case study writers and teachers are recommended, when designing and adapting sequential tasks, to consider systematic inculcation of cognitive levels among tasks and proper administration of scaffolding with regard to the aspects of task input, conditions, progress and outcome so that a balanced level of cognitive load aligned with the state of working memory capacity of students can be achieved for fostering critical thinking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a consensus that case studies in Business English class are helpful to foster critical thinking, but little research has been done to explore how case studies facilitate it. To bridge the gap, the present study uses the revised Bloom’s taxonomy as a tool to qualitatively and quantitatively investigate the effect of case studies in Market Leader textbooks on fostering critical thinking based on cognitive load theory. First, the presence of six cognitive levels targeted in the tasks is examined to see how case studies sequence their tasks according to the increase of cognitive complexity. Secondly, the scaffoldings distributed across the sequential tasks are explored to investigate how well they impose appropriate amount of cognitive load on students. Although six cognitive levels are found, there is an inappropriate administration of task scaffolding in a single task or task chain, leading to insufficient or superficial scaffolds and thus inducing high level of cognitive load for students to develop critical thinking. Accordingly, case study writers and teachers are recommended, when designing and adapting sequential tasks, to consider systematic inculcation of cognitive levels among tasks and proper administration of scaffolding with regard to the aspects of task input, conditions, progress and outcome so that a balanced level of cognitive load aligned with the state of working memory capacity of students can be achieved for fostering critical thinking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于认知负荷理论的商务英语教科书案例研究中的序列任务对培养批判性思维的影响
商务英语课堂中的案例研究有助于培养学生的批判性思维已成为共识,但很少有研究探讨案例研究是如何促进批判性思维的。为了弥补这一不足,本研究以认知负荷理论为基础,以修订版布鲁姆分类法为工具,对教科书中的案例研究对培养批判性思维的效果进行了定性和定量研究。首先,研究了任务中所针对的六个认知水平,以了解案例研究是如何根据认知复杂性的增加来安排任务顺序的。其次,探讨了分布在顺序任务中的支架,以研究它们如何给学生施加适量的认知负荷。虽然发现了六个认知水平,但在单个任务或任务链中存在任务支架管理不当的情况,导致支架不足或肤浅,从而给学生发展批判性思维带来了高水平的认知负荷。因此,建议案例研究作者和教师在设计和调整连环任务时,考虑系统地灌输任务间的认知水平,并从任务输入、条件、进度和结果等方面适当提供支架,以实现与学生工作记忆能力状态相一致的均衡认知负荷水平,从而培养批判性思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
期刊最新文献
Degraded contingency effect on running-based flavor aversion in rats: Testing the associative cue-competition account with flavors of minimal similarity Examining the role of classroom climate and teacher-student relationships in EFL students’ perceived learning outcomes: A self-determination theory perspective Effect of Raha syrup on the motivational effects of morphine and CSF serotonin levels in rats The mediating role of self-efficacy between high school students’ perceived teacher support and mathematics feedback literacy Metacognitive training for algebra teaching to high school students: An action research study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1