How do engineering suppliers create project value for buyers? A micro-foundational perspective

IF 7.1 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Operations & Production Management Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1108/ijopm-07-2023-0578
Miao Yu, Xinnan Wang, Xiaotian Yang, Lu Sun
{"title":"How do engineering suppliers create project value for buyers? A micro-foundational perspective","authors":"Miao Yu, Xinnan Wang, Xiaotian Yang, Lu Sun","doi":"10.1108/ijopm-07-2023-0578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Value creation in engineering projects has received considerable research attention. However, buyers’ expectations regarding project value do not always translate into the actions of project team members (actors). Drawing upon resource orchestration theory to explore the micro-foundations of project value creation (PVC), we investigate how suppliers organize project team members to create project value that meets buyers’ expectations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>We adopted two instructive engineering projects as comparative cases to analyze patterns in actor interactions in PVC.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results reveal “social interaction-based value creation” and “structural interaction-based value creation,” which explain the PVC process from the collective-level buyer’s expectations and supplier’s value orientation, to individual-level actor interactions (mobilizing, connecting, and networking), knowledge orchestration activities (structuring, bundling, and leveraging), and finally the value creation process (identifying, configuring, and generating) in project teams to generate collective-level project benefits and values.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>We propose a macro-approach to micro-foundations, with a focus on the buyer-expected PVC process on the supplier side. Furthermore, we explain how suppliers organize individual actions and orchestrate the individual knowledge through two patterns of individual-level actor interactions for collective-level PVC.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":14234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-07-2023-0578","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Value creation in engineering projects has received considerable research attention. However, buyers’ expectations regarding project value do not always translate into the actions of project team members (actors). Drawing upon resource orchestration theory to explore the micro-foundations of project value creation (PVC), we investigate how suppliers organize project team members to create project value that meets buyers’ expectations.

Design/methodology/approach

We adopted two instructive engineering projects as comparative cases to analyze patterns in actor interactions in PVC.

Findings

The results reveal “social interaction-based value creation” and “structural interaction-based value creation,” which explain the PVC process from the collective-level buyer’s expectations and supplier’s value orientation, to individual-level actor interactions (mobilizing, connecting, and networking), knowledge orchestration activities (structuring, bundling, and leveraging), and finally the value creation process (identifying, configuring, and generating) in project teams to generate collective-level project benefits and values.

Originality/value

We propose a macro-approach to micro-foundations, with a focus on the buyer-expected PVC process on the supplier side. Furthermore, we explain how suppliers organize individual actions and orchestrate the individual knowledge through two patterns of individual-level actor interactions for collective-level PVC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工程供应商如何为买方创造项目价值?微观基础视角
目的 工程项目中的价值创造已受到相当多的研究关注。然而,买方对项目价值的期望并不总能转化为项目团队成员(行动者)的行动。借鉴资源协调理论来探索项目价值创造(PVC)的微观基础,我们研究了供应商如何组织项目团队成员创造符合买方期望的项目价值。结果我们发现了 "基于社会互动的价值创造 "和 "基于结构互动的价值创造",它们解释了从集体层面的买方期望和供应商价值取向,到个体层面的行为者互动(动员、连接和网络)、知识协调活动(结构化、捆绑和利用),最后到项目团队的价值创造过程(识别、配置和生成),从而产生集体层面的项目效益和价值的 PVC 过程。原创性/价值我们提出了一种微观基础的宏观方法,重点关注供应商方面的买方预期聚氯乙烯过程。此外,我们还解释了供应商如何通过两种个人层面的行动者互动模式来组织个人行动和协调个人知识,从而实现集体层面的聚氯乙烯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
17.20%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The mission of the International Journal of Operations & Production Management (IJOPM) is to publish cutting-edge, innovative research with the potential to significantly advance the field of Operations and Supply Chain Management, both in theory and practice. Drawing on experiences from manufacturing and service sectors, in both private and public contexts, the journal has earned widespread respect in this complex and increasingly vital area of business management. Methodologically, IJOPM encompasses a broad spectrum of empirically-based inquiry using suitable research frameworks, as long as they offer generic insights of substantial value to operations and supply chain management. While the journal does not categorically exclude specific empirical methodologies, it does not accept purely mathematical modeling pieces. Regardless of the chosen mode of inquiry or methods employed, the key criteria are appropriateness of methodology, clarity in the study's execution, and rigor in the application of methods. It's important to note that any contribution should explicitly contribute to theory. The journal actively encourages the use of mixed methods where appropriate and valuable for generating research insights.
期刊最新文献
The importance of performance measurement and management in sustainable supply chain governance among SMEs How do engineering suppliers create project value for buyers? A micro-foundational perspective Unlocking circularity: the interplay between institutional pressures and supply chain integration Social-ecological resilience in extreme natural environments: a multiple case study of Arctic offshore supply ecosystems Purchasing contribution to innovation exploration: awareness, motivations and capabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1