Usefulness of the C2HEST score to predict new onset atrial fibrillation. A systematic review and meta-analysis on >11 million subjects

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL European Journal of Clinical Investigation Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1111/eci.14293
Daniele Pastori, Danilo Menichelli, Yan-Guang Li, Tommaso Brogi, Flavio Giuseppe Biccirè, Pasquale Pignatelli, Alessio Farcomeni, Gregory Y. H. Lip
{"title":"Usefulness of the C2HEST score to predict new onset atrial fibrillation. A systematic review and meta-analysis on >11 million subjects","authors":"Daniele Pastori,&nbsp;Danilo Menichelli,&nbsp;Yan-Guang Li,&nbsp;Tommaso Brogi,&nbsp;Flavio Giuseppe Biccirè,&nbsp;Pasquale Pignatelli,&nbsp;Alessio Farcomeni,&nbsp;Gregory Y. H. Lip","doi":"10.1111/eci.14293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is increasing in the last decades. NOAF is associated with worse long-term prognosis. The C<sub>2</sub>HEST score has been recently proposed to stratify the risk of NOAF. Pooled data on the performance of the C<sub>2</sub>HEST score are lacking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting data on NOAF according to the C<sub>2</sub>HEST score. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Google scholar databases without time restrictions until June 2023 according to PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis of the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and a sensitivity analysis according to setting of care and countries were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 360 studies, 17 were included in the analysis accounting for 11,067,496 subjects/patients with 307,869 NOAF cases. Mean age ranged from 41.3 to 71.2 years. The prevalence of women ranged from 10.6 to 54.75%. The pooled analysis gave an AUC of .70 (95% CI .66–.74). A subgroup analysis on studies from general population/primary care yielded an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.64–0.75). In the subgroup of patients with cardiovascular disease, the AUC was .71 (.69–.79). The C<sub>2</sub>HEST score performed similarly in Asian (AUC .72, 95% CI .68–.77), and in Western patients (AUC .68, 95% CI .62–.75). The best performance was observed in studies with a mean age &lt;50 years (<i>n</i> = 3,144,704 with 25,538 NOAF, AUC .78, 95% CI .76–.79).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The C<sub>2</sub>HEST score may be used to predict NOAF in primary and secondary prevention patients, and in patients across different countries. Early detection of NOAF may aid prompt initiation of management and follow-up, potentially leading to a reduction of AF-related complications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":"54 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eci.14293","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.14293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is increasing in the last decades. NOAF is associated with worse long-term prognosis. The C2HEST score has been recently proposed to stratify the risk of NOAF. Pooled data on the performance of the C2HEST score are lacking.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting data on NOAF according to the C2HEST score. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Google scholar databases without time restrictions until June 2023 according to PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis of the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and a sensitivity analysis according to setting of care and countries were performed.

Results

Of 360 studies, 17 were included in the analysis accounting for 11,067,496 subjects/patients with 307,869 NOAF cases. Mean age ranged from 41.3 to 71.2 years. The prevalence of women ranged from 10.6 to 54.75%. The pooled analysis gave an AUC of .70 (95% CI .66–.74). A subgroup analysis on studies from general population/primary care yielded an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.64–0.75). In the subgroup of patients with cardiovascular disease, the AUC was .71 (.69–.79). The C2HEST score performed similarly in Asian (AUC .72, 95% CI .68–.77), and in Western patients (AUC .68, 95% CI .62–.75). The best performance was observed in studies with a mean age <50 years (n = 3,144,704 with 25,538 NOAF, AUC .78, 95% CI .76–.79).

Conclusion

The C2HEST score may be used to predict NOAF in primary and secondary prevention patients, and in patients across different countries. Early detection of NOAF may aid prompt initiation of management and follow-up, potentially leading to a reduction of AF-related complications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
C2HEST 评分在预测新发心房颤动方面的实用性。对超过 1,100 万名受试者进行的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景近几十年来,新发心房颤动(NOAF)的发病率不断上升。新发心房颤动与较差的长期预后有关。最近有人提出了 C2HEST 评分来对 NOAF 的风险进行分层。方法对根据 C2HEST 评分报告 NOAF 数据的观察性研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。根据 PRISMA 指南,我们在 2023 年 6 月之前对 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Google scholar 数据库进行了无时间限制的检索。我们对曲线下面积(AUC)和 95% 置信区间(95% CI)进行了元分析,并根据医疗环境和国家进行了敏感性分析。结果 在 360 项研究中,有 17 项被纳入分析,涉及 11,067,496 名受试者/患者,307,869 例 NOAF。平均年龄从 41.3 岁到 71.2 岁不等。女性发病率从 10.6% 到 54.75% 不等。汇总分析的 AUC 为 0.70(95% CI 0.66-0.74)。对普通人群/初级保健研究进行的亚组分析得出的 AUC 为 0.69(95% CI 0.64-0.75)。在心血管疾病患者亚组中,AUC 为 0.71(.69-.79)。C2HEST 评分在亚洲患者(AUC .72,95% CI .68-.77)和西方患者(AUC .68,95% CI .62-.75)中的表现相似。结论 C2HEST 评分可用于预测一级和二级预防患者以及不同国家患者的 NOAF。C2HEST评分可用于预测一级和二级预防患者以及不同国家患者的NOAF,早期发现NOAF有助于及时启动管理和随访,从而减少房颤相关并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Ceramide and phosphatidylcholine lipids-based risk score predicts major cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure. Issue Information [225Ac]Ac-PSMA for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Machine learning for stroke in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction but without atrial fibrillation: A post-hoc analysis of the WARCEF trial. Structural aspects of CEACAM1 interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1