Leading impactful research: applying platform thinking to drive collaborative inquiry in the innovation field

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS European Journal of Innovation Management Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1108/ejim-11-2023-0975
Daniel Trabucchi, Paola Bellis, Tommaso Buganza, Filomena Canterino, Abraham B. (Rami) Shani, Roberto Verganti, Joseph Press
{"title":"Leading impactful research: applying platform thinking to drive collaborative inquiry in the innovation field","authors":"Daniel Trabucchi, Paola Bellis, Tommaso Buganza, Filomena Canterino, Abraham B. (Rami) Shani, Roberto Verganti, Joseph Press","doi":"10.1108/ejim-11-2023-0975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study investigates the application of collaborative inquiry within innovation management, employing platform thinking to address challenges of generalizability and relevance. The aim is to integrate Collaborative Inquiry methods, characterized by participatory, diffuse, and reflective practices, to transform research into a tool for impactful change in organizations in the field of innovation management.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A longitudinal participatory case study approach focuses on the IDeaLs case—a research platform that collaborated with multiple companies over several years. The data gathered and analyzed comes from the research project within the research platforms over the first two editions and from the research platform management and coordination activities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study introduces the Collaborative Research Platform Approach (CRPA), demonstrating its effectiveness in addressing typical constraints of traditional research methodologies through a real-world application within the IDeaLs case. The findings highlight the CRPA's potential in fostering a dynamic, co-creative research environment that bridges theoretical knowledge with practical applications, thus enhancing both scholarly and organizational outcomes while pursuing a future change within the organizations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>There are two main research implications. First, it proposes platform thinking as a theoretical lens to read a multi-stakeholder phenomenon in the research domain, confirming its nature of value-creation mechanisms, using it outside the business model and strategic space. Second, it offers a methodological contribution by presenting the CRPA framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The CRPA framework offers organizations a structured approach to managing collaborative research projects that align with both academic rigor and practical relevance. Companies engaged in the study reported enhanced ability to implement actionable insights from research, influencing real-time decision-making processes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>By fostering collaborative engagements across multiple stakeholders, the CRPA promotes a research culture that values inclusivity and practical impact, potentially leading to broader societal benefits through improved innovation management practices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper contributes to the innovation management field by proposing the CRPA, which integrates principles of Platform Thinking with Collaborative Inquiry. This novel approach is designed to improve the applicability and scope of innovation research, offering a robust framework that enhances engagement and utility across academic and business domains. It uses platforms as a theoretical lens to read a multi-stakeholder environment in the research domain.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51462,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Innovation Management","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-11-2023-0975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigates the application of collaborative inquiry within innovation management, employing platform thinking to address challenges of generalizability and relevance. The aim is to integrate Collaborative Inquiry methods, characterized by participatory, diffuse, and reflective practices, to transform research into a tool for impactful change in organizations in the field of innovation management.

Design/methodology/approach

A longitudinal participatory case study approach focuses on the IDeaLs case—a research platform that collaborated with multiple companies over several years. The data gathered and analyzed comes from the research project within the research platforms over the first two editions and from the research platform management and coordination activities.

Findings

The study introduces the Collaborative Research Platform Approach (CRPA), demonstrating its effectiveness in addressing typical constraints of traditional research methodologies through a real-world application within the IDeaLs case. The findings highlight the CRPA's potential in fostering a dynamic, co-creative research environment that bridges theoretical knowledge with practical applications, thus enhancing both scholarly and organizational outcomes while pursuing a future change within the organizations.

Research limitations/implications

There are two main research implications. First, it proposes platform thinking as a theoretical lens to read a multi-stakeholder phenomenon in the research domain, confirming its nature of value-creation mechanisms, using it outside the business model and strategic space. Second, it offers a methodological contribution by presenting the CRPA framework.

Practical implications

The CRPA framework offers organizations a structured approach to managing collaborative research projects that align with both academic rigor and practical relevance. Companies engaged in the study reported enhanced ability to implement actionable insights from research, influencing real-time decision-making processes.

Social implications

By fostering collaborative engagements across multiple stakeholders, the CRPA promotes a research culture that values inclusivity and practical impact, potentially leading to broader societal benefits through improved innovation management practices.

Originality/value

This paper contributes to the innovation management field by proposing the CRPA, which integrates principles of Platform Thinking with Collaborative Inquiry. This novel approach is designed to improve the applicability and scope of innovation research, offering a robust framework that enhances engagement and utility across academic and business domains. It uses platforms as a theoretical lens to read a multi-stakeholder environment in the research domain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引领有影响力的研究:运用平台思维推动创新领域的合作探究
目的 本研究调查了协作探究在创新管理中的应用,采用平台思维来应对可推广性和相关性方面的挑战。目的是整合以参与性、扩散性和反思性实践为特征的合作探究方法,将研究转化为创新管理领域中对组织有影响的变革工具。设计/方法/途径纵向参与式案例研究方法侧重于 IDeaLs 案例--一个与多家公司合作数年的研究平台。收集和分析的数据来自前两期研究平台内的研究项目以及研究平台的管理和协调活动。研究结果本研究介绍了合作研究平台方法(CRPA),通过 IDeaLs 案例中的实际应用,展示了该方法在解决传统研究方法的典型限制方面的有效性。研究结果凸显了 CRPA 在营造动态、共同创造的研究环境方面的潜力,这种环境可以将理论知识与实际应用联系起来,从而在追求组织内部未来变革的同时,提高学术和组织成果。首先,它提出了平台思维这一理论视角,以解读研究领域中的多方利益相关者现象,确认其价值创造机制的本质,将其用于商业模式和战略空间之外。实践意义CRPA 框架为企业提供了管理合作研究项目的结构化方法,既符合学术严谨性,又具有实用性。社会意义通过促进多方利益相关者的合作参与,CRPA 促进了一种重视包容性和实际影响的研究文化,并可能通过改进创新管理实践带来更广泛的社会效益。原创性/价值本文通过提出 CRPA,将平台思维原则与合作探究相结合,为创新管理领域做出了贡献。这种新颖的方法旨在改善创新研究的适用性和范围,提供一个强大的框架,提高学术和商业领域的参与度和实用性。它以平台为理论视角,解读研究领域的多方利益相关者环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
17.60%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: The subject of innovation is receiving increased interest both from companies because of their increased awareness of the impact of innovation in determining market success and also from the research community. Academics are increasingly beginning to place innovation as a priority area in their research agenda. This impetus has been partly fuelled by the Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC) who have designated innovation as one of nine research areas in their research initiative schemes.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the impact of technological innovation and SMEs resilience: the moderating role of firms' social sustainability orientation Involving lead users in firm’s standardization strategy within action groups: evidence from smart robotics “Every idea made life easier:” A critical discourse analysis of creative employee-driven innovation in the Italian healthcare system How the digital environment moderates disruptive technology and digital entrepreneurship relationship in emerging markets Innovating the bank-firm relationship: a spherical fuzzy approach to SME funding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1