Elena Zappon, Matthias A. F. Gsell, Karli Gillette, Gernot Plank
{"title":"Quantifying variabilities in cardiac digital twin models of the electrocardiogram","authors":"Elena Zappon, Matthias A. F. Gsell, Karli Gillette, Gernot Plank","doi":"arxiv-2407.17146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CDT of human cardiac EP are digital replicas of patient hearts that match\nlike-for-like clinical observations. The ECG, as the most prevalent non-invasive observation of cardiac\nelectrophysiology, is considered an ideal target for CDT calibration. Recent\nadvanced CDT calibration methods have demonstrated their ability to minimize\ndiscrepancies between simulated and measured ECG signals, effectively\nreplicating all key morphological features relevant to diagnostics. However,\ndue to the inherent nature of clinical data acquisition and CDT model\ngeneration pipelines, discrepancies inevitably arise between the real physical\nelectrophysiology in a patient and the simulated virtual electrophysiology in a\nCDT. In this study, we aim to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the impact\nof these uncertainties on ECG morphology and diagnostic markers. We analyze\nresidual beat-to-beat variability in ECG recordings obtained from healthy\nsubjects and patients. Using a biophysically detailed and anatomically accurate\ncomputational model of whole-heart electrophysiology combined with a detailed\ntorso model calibrated to closely replicate measured ECG signals, we vary\nanatomical factors (heart location, orientation, size), heterogeneity in\nelectrical conductivities in the heart and torso, and electrode placements\nacross ECG leads to assess their qualitative impact on ECG morphology. Our study demonstrates that diagnostically relevant ECG features and overall\nmorphology appear relatively robust against the investigated uncertainties.\nThis resilience is consistent with the narrow distribution of ECG due to\nresidual beat-to-beat variability observed in both healthy subjects and\npatients.","PeriodicalId":501572,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.17146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CDT of human cardiac EP are digital replicas of patient hearts that match
like-for-like clinical observations. The ECG, as the most prevalent non-invasive observation of cardiac
electrophysiology, is considered an ideal target for CDT calibration. Recent
advanced CDT calibration methods have demonstrated their ability to minimize
discrepancies between simulated and measured ECG signals, effectively
replicating all key morphological features relevant to diagnostics. However,
due to the inherent nature of clinical data acquisition and CDT model
generation pipelines, discrepancies inevitably arise between the real physical
electrophysiology in a patient and the simulated virtual electrophysiology in a
CDT. In this study, we aim to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the impact
of these uncertainties on ECG morphology and diagnostic markers. We analyze
residual beat-to-beat variability in ECG recordings obtained from healthy
subjects and patients. Using a biophysically detailed and anatomically accurate
computational model of whole-heart electrophysiology combined with a detailed
torso model calibrated to closely replicate measured ECG signals, we vary
anatomical factors (heart location, orientation, size), heterogeneity in
electrical conductivities in the heart and torso, and electrode placements
across ECG leads to assess their qualitative impact on ECG morphology. Our study demonstrates that diagnostically relevant ECG features and overall
morphology appear relatively robust against the investigated uncertainties.
This resilience is consistent with the narrow distribution of ECG due to
residual beat-to-beat variability observed in both healthy subjects and
patients.