Nicholas A White, Aart J van der Molen, Ronald WAL Limpens, Jacinta Maas, Koen EA van der Bogt, Tim Horeman, Joris I. Rotmans
{"title":"Intraluminal pressure in central venous hemodialysis catheters during power injection of contrast media","authors":"Nicholas A White, Aart J van der Molen, Ronald WAL Limpens, Jacinta Maas, Koen EA van der Bogt, Tim Horeman, Joris I. Rotmans","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.23.24310903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:\nCentral venous catheters (CVCs) provide direct access to the central circulatory system, commonly used in hemodialysis and intensive care units for drug administration. Although uncertified for the procedure, CVCs are sometimes used for power injection of contrast medium (CM) during CT scans to avoid peripheral intravenous catheter placement. Previous studies suggest this practice is safe, but incidents have been reported. This study aims to measure intraluminal pressure during CM injection through CVCs and assess its impact on the luminal surface to guide responsible clinical use.\nMethods:\nStrain gauges were applied to the exterior walls of four samples from three different types of unused CVCs. These gauges measured material deformation due to intraluminal pressure during CM injections at rates of 4.5 mL/s and 8 mL/s, each performed five times. Strain data were calibrated against known pressures in a static system. The CVCs were then either pressurized until bursting or subjected to microscopic analysis of their luminal surfaces.\nResults:\nIntraluminal pressures measured (97-545 kPa or 14-79 PSI) were below the burst pressure (779-1248 Kpa or 113-181 PSI) in all instances. Strain regression analysis shows a statistically significant (p<0.05) trend over 10 injections in almost all CVCs tested, indicating material fatigue. Surface microscopy revealed surface micro-cracks from repeated injections, suggesting material damage.\nConclusions:\nThe intraluminal pressures from power injections of CM are sufficiently low to prevent CVC bursting. While incidental use for CM injection appears safe, repeated use may cause material damage?","PeriodicalId":501358,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.23.24310903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background:
Central venous catheters (CVCs) provide direct access to the central circulatory system, commonly used in hemodialysis and intensive care units for drug administration. Although uncertified for the procedure, CVCs are sometimes used for power injection of contrast medium (CM) during CT scans to avoid peripheral intravenous catheter placement. Previous studies suggest this practice is safe, but incidents have been reported. This study aims to measure intraluminal pressure during CM injection through CVCs and assess its impact on the luminal surface to guide responsible clinical use.
Methods:
Strain gauges were applied to the exterior walls of four samples from three different types of unused CVCs. These gauges measured material deformation due to intraluminal pressure during CM injections at rates of 4.5 mL/s and 8 mL/s, each performed five times. Strain data were calibrated against known pressures in a static system. The CVCs were then either pressurized until bursting or subjected to microscopic analysis of their luminal surfaces.
Results:
Intraluminal pressures measured (97-545 kPa or 14-79 PSI) were below the burst pressure (779-1248 Kpa or 113-181 PSI) in all instances. Strain regression analysis shows a statistically significant (p<0.05) trend over 10 injections in almost all CVCs tested, indicating material fatigue. Surface microscopy revealed surface micro-cracks from repeated injections, suggesting material damage.
Conclusions:
The intraluminal pressures from power injections of CM are sufficiently low to prevent CVC bursting. While incidental use for CM injection appears safe, repeated use may cause material damage?