Modern physics courses: Understanding the content taught in the U.S

Alexis Buzzell, Ramón Barthelemy, Tim Atherton
{"title":"Modern physics courses: Understanding the content taught in the U.S","authors":"Alexis Buzzell, Ramón Barthelemy, Tim Atherton","doi":"arxiv-2407.15951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern physics course is a crucial gateway for physics majors,\nintroducing concepts beyond the scope of K-12 education. Despite its\nsignificance, content varies widely among institutions. This study analyzes 167\nmodern physics syllabi from 127 US research intensive institutions, employing\nemergent coding using both human and Natural Language Processing methods from\npublic sources (51.5%) and private correspondence (48.5%). Public course\ncatalogs were consulted to identify pre- and co-requisites, with 37.1% of\nstudents having completed calculus II. Foundational topics like Newtonian\nmechanics (94%), electricity and magnetism (84.4%), and waves or optics (77.2%)\nwere frequently required. Quantum physics (94%), atomic physics (83%), and\nrelativity (70%) were most commonly taught. The study highlights the lack of\nuniformity in modern physics curricula, emphasizing the importance of a\nconsistent and comprehensive education for physics majors across universities.\nThis insight contributes to the ongoing discourse on optimizing physics\neducation in higher education.","PeriodicalId":501565,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.15951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The modern physics course is a crucial gateway for physics majors, introducing concepts beyond the scope of K-12 education. Despite its significance, content varies widely among institutions. This study analyzes 167 modern physics syllabi from 127 US research intensive institutions, employing emergent coding using both human and Natural Language Processing methods from public sources (51.5%) and private correspondence (48.5%). Public course catalogs were consulted to identify pre- and co-requisites, with 37.1% of students having completed calculus II. Foundational topics like Newtonian mechanics (94%), electricity and magnetism (84.4%), and waves or optics (77.2%) were frequently required. Quantum physics (94%), atomic physics (83%), and relativity (70%) were most commonly taught. The study highlights the lack of uniformity in modern physics curricula, emphasizing the importance of a consistent and comprehensive education for physics majors across universities. This insight contributes to the ongoing discourse on optimizing physics education in higher education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代物理课程:了解美国教授的内容
现代物理课程是物理专业的重要入门课程,它所介绍的概念超出了 K-12 教育的范围。尽管该课程意义重大,但各院校的内容却大相径庭。本研究分析了来自 127 所美国研究密集型院校的 167 份现代物理教学大纲,使用人工和自然语言处理方法对公共资源(51.5%)和私人通信(48.5%)进行了初步编码。我们查阅了公共课程目录以确定先修课程和共同先修课程,37.1% 的学生已完成微积分 II。牛顿力学(94%)、电学和磁学(84.4%)、波或光学(77.2%)等基础课题经常被要求学习。量子物理学(94%)、原子物理学(83%)和相对论(70%)是最常见的教学内容。这项研究凸显了现代物理课程缺乏统一性的问题,强调了在各大学对物理专业学生进行统一而全面的教育的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing New Technology in Educational Systems Reflecting to learn in a physics multimedia communication course The Law of Closest Approach Investigating the Design--Science Connection in a multi-week Engineering Design (ED)-based introductory physics laboratory task A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Empathy in Physics Faculty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1