Obstetric interventions’ effects on the birthing experience

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06626-5
Anna Volkert, Lisa Bach, Carsten Hagenbeck, Jan Kössendrup, Charlotte Oberröhrmann, Mi-Ran Okumu, Nadine Scholten
{"title":"Obstetric interventions’ effects on the birthing experience","authors":"Anna Volkert, Lisa Bach, Carsten Hagenbeck, Jan Kössendrup, Charlotte Oberröhrmann, Mi-Ran Okumu, Nadine Scholten","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06626-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The birth experience plays a pivotal role in the mother´s mental well-being and has a crucial effect on the mother-child bond. Unanticipated medical interventions, including fundal pressure, episiotomy, assisted vaginal delivery (AVD), or unplanned cesarean section (CS) during labor, may adversely affect the birth experience. The objective of this study is to identify factors contributing to the diminished evaluation of the birth experience after assessing the prevalence of unplanned obstetrical interventions in Germany. For this cross-sectional analysis, 4000 mothers whose children were born 8 or 12 months before were asked about their birth experience via a paper-based questionnaire. Overall 1102 mothers participated in the study, representing a response rate of 27.6%. The revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ2) was used to measure the childbirth experience. In addition to descriptive and bivariate analyses using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Kruskal-Wallis-test, we calculated multivariate linear regression models for each dimension of the CEQ2. In general, the participants evaluated their childbirth experience favorably, assigning an average rating of 3.09 on a scale ranging from 1 to 4. Women who experienced fundal pressure, an AVD, or an unplanned CS rated their birth experience significantly worse compared to women who gave birth without interventions. Unplanned CSs received the lowest ratings for “personal capability” and “perceived safety,” and an AVD resulted in lower scores for “professional support” and “participation.” However, the interventions we studied did not account for much of the variation in how the childbirth experience plays out for different individuals. Obstetric interventions have a significant effect on different dimensions of the birth experience. If a high level of birth satisfaction is to be achieved, it is important to know which dimension of satisfaction is affected by the intervention so that explicit measures, like fostering communication, participation or safety can be taken to promote improvement. DRKS00029214, retrospectively registered (Registration Date 22.06.2023).","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06626-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The birth experience plays a pivotal role in the mother´s mental well-being and has a crucial effect on the mother-child bond. Unanticipated medical interventions, including fundal pressure, episiotomy, assisted vaginal delivery (AVD), or unplanned cesarean section (CS) during labor, may adversely affect the birth experience. The objective of this study is to identify factors contributing to the diminished evaluation of the birth experience after assessing the prevalence of unplanned obstetrical interventions in Germany. For this cross-sectional analysis, 4000 mothers whose children were born 8 or 12 months before were asked about their birth experience via a paper-based questionnaire. Overall 1102 mothers participated in the study, representing a response rate of 27.6%. The revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ2) was used to measure the childbirth experience. In addition to descriptive and bivariate analyses using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Kruskal-Wallis-test, we calculated multivariate linear regression models for each dimension of the CEQ2. In general, the participants evaluated their childbirth experience favorably, assigning an average rating of 3.09 on a scale ranging from 1 to 4. Women who experienced fundal pressure, an AVD, or an unplanned CS rated their birth experience significantly worse compared to women who gave birth without interventions. Unplanned CSs received the lowest ratings for “personal capability” and “perceived safety,” and an AVD resulted in lower scores for “professional support” and “participation.” However, the interventions we studied did not account for much of the variation in how the childbirth experience plays out for different individuals. Obstetric interventions have a significant effect on different dimensions of the birth experience. If a high level of birth satisfaction is to be achieved, it is important to know which dimension of satisfaction is affected by the intervention so that explicit measures, like fostering communication, participation or safety can be taken to promote improvement. DRKS00029214, retrospectively registered (Registration Date 22.06.2023).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产科干预对分娩体验的影响
分娩经历对母亲的心理健康起着举足轻重的作用,并对母子关系有着至关重要的影响。意外的医疗干预,包括宫底压力、外阴切开术、阴道助产(AVD)或分娩过程中意外的剖宫产(CS),都可能对分娩体验产生不利影响。本研究的目的是在评估德国计划外产科干预的发生率后,找出导致对分娩体验评价降低的因素。在这项横断面分析中,我们通过纸质问卷向 4000 名孩子出生 8 个月或 12 个月前的母亲询问了她们的分娩经历。共有 1102 名母亲参与了研究,回复率为 27.6%。经修订的分娩体验问卷(CEQ2)用于测量分娩体验。除了使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行描述性分析和双变量分析外,我们还计算了 CEQ2 各维度的多元线性回归模型。总体而言,参与者对其分娩经历的评价较好,在 1 到 4 分的评分范围内平均得分为 3.09 分。与未进行干预的产妇相比,经历过宫底受压、AVD 或计划外 CS 的产妇对其分娩经历的评价明显较差。计划外剖腹产在 "个人能力 "和 "安全感 "方面的评分最低,而倒立导致 "专业支持 "和 "参与 "方面的评分较低。然而,我们所研究的干预措施并不能解释不同个体在分娩经历中的大部分差异。产科干预对分娩体验的不同方面有显著影响。如果要达到较高的分娩满意度,就必须了解干预措施对满意度的哪些方面产生了影响,以便采取明确的措施(如促进沟通、参与或安全)来促进满意度的提高。DRKS00029214,追溯注册(注册日期 22.06.2023)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Trends and determinants of the use of episiotomy in a prospective population-based registry from central India Management of cervical cancer in pregnancy in a low resource setting: a rare case report Establishment and validation of a predictive model for spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnant women COVID testing hesitancy among pregnant patients: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic about the unique needs and challenges of medically complex populations Letrozole co-treatment in an antagonist protocol for overweight women undergoing IVF treatment: a retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1